1. Sample Update (Al 2 O 3 & MgO) S. Jokela, I. Veryovkin, A. Zinovev

2. Al 2 O 3 S1 – 5.5nm, S3 – 11.3nm

3. Al 2 O 3 Selected Data Averaged However, long-term monitoring or high- fluence electron exposure will determine the final values of these curves. S1 – 5.5nm, S3 – 11.3nm

4. MgO S5 (left) – 7.2nm, S9 (right) – 14.4nm

5. MgO Selected Data Averaged Not nearly as large of a difference between samples as was seen in the Al 2 O 3 samples. S5 – 7.2nm, S9 – 14.4nm

6. Overall Comparison Tungsten coating doesn’t seem to affect results in a significantly helpful way MgO is clearly a better emitter, especially for higher primary electron energies. With the amount of variation seen in prior samples, MgO is comparable to Al 2 O 3 for lower primary electron energies.

7. Future Work MCP Godparent Review I have 4 more samples to test (2×Al 2 O 3 and 2×MgO) Will continue working on system to get electron gun working for large-area, high- fluence, electron exposure. May have access to thin-film diamond samples