Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

COMPARISON OF OCULAR RESULTS OF MECHANICAL CHOPER VS ULTRACHOPER FERNANDO AGUILERA MD. INSTITUTO DE OJOS, MEXICO NO FINANCIAL INTEREST.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "COMPARISON OF OCULAR RESULTS OF MECHANICAL CHOPER VS ULTRACHOPER FERNANDO AGUILERA MD. INSTITUTO DE OJOS, MEXICO NO FINANCIAL INTEREST."— Presentation transcript:

1 COMPARISON OF OCULAR RESULTS OF MECHANICAL CHOPER VS ULTRACHOPER FERNANDO AGUILERA MD. INSTITUTO DE OJOS, MEXICO NO FINANCIAL INTEREST

2 ULTRACHOPER PHACO NEEDLE DESIGN THAT CUTS THROUGH TISSUE USING SIDE TO SIDE MOVEMENT OF TORSIONAL PHACOPHACO NEEDLE DESIGN THAT CUTS THROUGH TISSUE USING SIDE TO SIDE MOVEMENT OF TORSIONAL PHACO DESIGNED BY DR LUIS ESCAF OF COLOMBIADESIGNED BY DR LUIS ESCAF OF COLOMBIA PRODUCES 100 um WIDE CUTS THAT FACILITATE PHACO CHOP TECHNIQUES ESPECIALLY IN HARD BRUNESCENT CATARACTSPRODUCES 100 um WIDE CUTS THAT FACILITATE PHACO CHOP TECHNIQUES ESPECIALLY IN HARD BRUNESCENT CATARACTS 4.5-5.0 mm 2.5 mm SAFETY ZONE 2.0-2.5 mm AGUILERA MD

3 ULTRACHOPER MATERIAL AND METHODSMATERIAL AND METHODS 40 CATARACT CASES HARDNESS GRADE 440 CATARACT CASES HARDNESS GRADE 4 20 CASES OPERATED USING TORSIONAL PHACO WITH KELMAN 0.9 mm MINIFLARED/ 45 DEGREE NEEDLE20 CASES OPERATED USING TORSIONAL PHACO WITH KELMAN 0.9 mm MINIFLARED/ 45 DEGREE NEEDLE 20 CASES PHACO USING ULTRACHOPER NEEDLE PLUS MINIFLARED 45 DEGREE 0.9 mm PHACO NEEDLE20 CASES PHACO USING ULTRACHOPER NEEDLE PLUS MINIFLARED 45 DEGREE 0.9 mm PHACO NEEDLE SAME PHACO MACHINE PARAMETERS:SAME PHACO MACHINE PARAMETERS: -POWER TORSIONAL 100% LINEAL -VACUUM 350 mm Hg/ Flow 35 cc/min LINEAL - SSB 110 cm -INFINITI – INTREPID CASSETE OVD: ViscoDispersive PRE- POSTOP (1 w,1,3 and 6 months):PRE- POSTOP (1 w,1,3 and 6 months): SPECULAR MICROSCOPY SPECULAR MICROSCOPY CORNEAL PACHIMETRY TRANSOPERATIVE MEASUREMENTS:TRANSOPERATIVE MEASUREMENTS: ENERGY DELIVERED (CDE), BSS USED AGUILERA MD

4 U L T R A C H O P E R

5 R E S U L T S AGUILERA MD

6 R E S U L T S AGUILERA MD

7 R E S U L T S

8 AGUILERA MD

9 CONCLUSION ULTRACHOPPER AND MECHANICAL CHOPPER WERE EFFECTIVE AND SAFE IN THE PHACOEMULSIFICATION OF BRUNESCENT CATARACTS.ULTRACHOPPER AND MECHANICAL CHOPPER WERE EFFECTIVE AND SAFE IN THE PHACOEMULSIFICATION OF BRUNESCENT CATARACTS. ALTHOUGH THE ULTRACHOPER GROUP NEEDED MORE ENERGY AND BSS USE (STATISTICALY SIGNIFICANT), IT DID NOT INFLUENCED DIFFERENCES IN CORNEAL PACHIMETRY OR ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS AT 6 MONTHSALTHOUGH THE ULTRACHOPER GROUP NEEDED MORE ENERGY AND BSS USE (STATISTICALY SIGNIFICANT), IT DID NOT INFLUENCED DIFFERENCES IN CORNEAL PACHIMETRY OR ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS AT 6 MONTHS ULTRACHOPER WAS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE FOR PHACO OF BRUNESCENT CATARACTSULTRACHOPER WAS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE FOR PHACO OF BRUNESCENT CATARACTS AGUILERA MD


Download ppt "COMPARISON OF OCULAR RESULTS OF MECHANICAL CHOPER VS ULTRACHOPER FERNANDO AGUILERA MD. INSTITUTO DE OJOS, MEXICO NO FINANCIAL INTEREST."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google