Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTheresa Greene Modified over 8 years ago
1
P Xa13 :GUSP xa13 :GUS Supplemental Figure 1 -glucuronidase (GUS) expression regulated by the promoters of dominant Xa13 (P Xa13 ) and recessive xa13 (P xa13 ) genes when free of pathogen infection.
2
0 h 3 d PXO99 Water P Xa13 :GFP P xa13 :GFP 0 h 3 d Supplemental Figure 2 Green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression regulated by the promoters of dominant Xa13 (P Xa13 ) and recessive xa13 (P xa13 ) genes. The leaves of transgenic plants were inoculated with Xoo strain PXO99 or water (control) immediately (0 h) or at 3 d after inoculation.
3
Supplemental Figure 3 Expression of dominant Xa13 and recessive xa13 by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR after inoculation with different Xoo strains, PXO99, PXO61, PXO79, and PXO145, in rice lines IRBB13 and IR24, respectively. IRBB13 and IR24 are near-isogenic lines. PXO61 PXO79 PXO99 PXO145 Xa13/xa13 Actin IRBB13 (xa13) IR24 (Xa13) 0 0.5 1 3 5 Time after inoculation of Xoo (day)
4
Xa13 rRNA IRBB13 (WT) T 0 plants (D129UI) transformed with P Ubi :Xa13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 0 5 10 15 Lesion area (%) xa13 rRNA T 0 plants (D81UI) transformed with P Ubi :xa13 IRBB13 (WT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 0 5 10 15 Lesion area (%) xa13 Leu49 rRNA IRBB13 (WT) T 0 plants (D83UI) transformed with P Ubi :xa13 Leu49 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 35 36 37 38 0 5 10 15 Lesion area (%) Supplemental Figure 4 Transgenic plants constitutively expressing target genes. The plants were inoculated with Xoo strain PXO99. Bars represent mean (5 replicates) standard deviation. The expression level of transgene was detected by RNA gel blot analysis using probe amplified with primers CDS4F (5’-AGTCGACGGGAGGGTACAG-3’) and CDS4R (5’- GTTCTGCAGCAGCTCCTTGT-3’).
5
Figure S4 (continued) Transgenic plants constitutively expressing target genes. The plants were inoculated with Xoo strain PXO99. Bars represent mean (5 replicates) standard deviation. The expression level of transgene was detected by RNA gel blot analysis using probe amplified with primers CDS4F (5’-AGTCGACGGGAGGGTACAG-3’) and CDS4R (5’- GTTCTGCAGCAGCTCCTTGT-3’). 0 3 6 9 xa13 Val184 rRNA IRBB13 (WT) T 0 plants (D84UI) transformed with P Ubi :xa13 Val184 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Lesion area (%) xa13 Ala85 rRNA IRBB13 (WT) T 0 plants (D82UI) transformed with P Ubi :xa13 Ala85 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 5 10 15 Lesion area (%)
6
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 02468101214 Days after inoculation Bacteria [log (cfu/leaf)] IRBB13 (wild type) P Ubi :xa13 Leu49 :TNos (T 0 ) P Xa13 :xa13 Leu49 (T 0 ) IR24 Supplemental Figure 5 Growth of Xoo strain PXO99 in the leaves transgenic lines. cfu, colony-forming unit. IR24, the near-isogenic line of IRBB13, carrying dominant Xa13. Each data point represents mean (3 replicates) standard deviation.
7
Supplemental Figure 6 Expression of pathogenesis-related genes PR1b/PR-1 and PR10/PBZ1 in near-isogenic lines IRBB13 carrying xa13 and IR24 carrying Xa13. Samples were collected at 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 d after inoculation with Xoo strain PXO61 or PXO99 or inoculated with water (control), which also served as wounding treatment for the inoculation was performed by leaf-clipping method. ck, without treatment. IRBB13 was resistant (incompatible) to PXO99 and susceptible (compatible) to PXO61, IR24 was susceptible (compatible) to PXO61 and PXO99. Bars represent mean (3 replicates) standard deviation.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.