1. U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Director, Office of Science April 29, 2004 PRESENTATION FOR THE BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTTEE

2. Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 2 The Office of Science  OneSC – Reorganization of the Office of Science  Organizational Structure  Impact  20 Year Facility Outlook  Status of implementation  Competition  GTL Facilities

3. 3 Director Principal Deputy Director Deputy Director for Operations Chief of Staff Office of IT Management Office of Biological and Environmental Research Previous Office of Science Structure Office of Planning & Analysis Office of Resource Management Brookhaven Site Office Assistant Secretary Environmental Management Richland Operations Office Associate Manager for Science & Technology Office of High Energy and Nuclear Physics Office of Basic Energy Sciences Office of Fusion Energy Sciences Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research Ames Site Office Argonne Site Office Princeton Site Office Fermi Site Office Assistant Manager For Laboratories Thomas Jefferson Site Office Oak Ridge Site Office Berkeley Site Office Stanford Site Office Pacific Northwest Site Office Oak Ridge Operations Office Chicago Operations Office Office of Lab Operations & ES&H Office of Laboratory Policy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Under Secretary Nuclear Security “Oakland Operations Office”

4. Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 4 The OneSC Structure

5. Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 5 OneSC Impact  Removes a layer of management and integrates the site managers with headquarters  Clarifies Roles, Responsibilities, Authorities and Accountabilities  Integrates the Office of Science’s program, operational, and support elements  Provides a management structure that provides the Director of the Office of Science with a coordinated “sense of the laboratory” for the Office of Science’s national laboratories

6. Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 6 Implementing the 20 Year Facility Outlook The Path to 21 st Century Scientific Leadership ITER Negotiations Continue Siting major issue Leadership-Class Computer Competition Four excellent proposals Widely differing architectures CD-0 complete: Linac Coherent Light Source Protein Production & Tags Rare Isotope Accelerator Characterization & Imaging CEBAF Upgrade BTeV Funds Requested in FY05 for: Linac Coherent Light Source Preliminary Engineering Design and Long Lead Procurement Protein Production and Tags Facility Preliminary Engineering Design

7. Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 7 Facility Siting Competition “ Where existing facilities provide capabilities critical to a new user facility, colocation is appropriate; where this is not the case, the location of new user facilities should be openly competed” FY04 Appropriations Conference Report DOE is barred from competing FFRDCs against non- FFRDCs, except for “…management and operation of an FFRDC.” Protein Production and Tags Facility will be competed among DOE laboratories Laboratories may competitively select university partners Imaging and Characterization Facility will be competed among universities Decision on remaining GTL facilities depends on further definition of facility requirements.

8. Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 8 BER Budget FY04 vs FY05 As GTL facilities will significantly increase future BER construction and operations budgets.