Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

14/01/20161 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP HOW TO SAVE FUEL.

Published byJunior Lamb Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "14/01/20161 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP HOW TO SAVE FUEL."— Presentation transcript:

1 14/01/20161 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP HOW TO SAVE FUEL BY LOSING TIME? Jean-Pierre NICOLAON EUROCONTROL - EEC

2 14/01/20162 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002  IN ABSORBING ARRIVAL DELAYS LINEARY DURING DESCENT INSTEAD OF HOLDING STACK TECHNIQUE

3 14/01/20163 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 ARRIVAL TRAFFIC IS GENERALLY ORGANIZED THROUGH SUCCESSIVE LAYERS:  STEP 1  ARRIVAL SLOTS (AIRLINES SCHEDULES) ARE DETERMINED ACCORDING TO RUNWAY CAPACITY (TYPICAL VALUE 44 a/c PER HOUR FOR SPECIALIZED RUNWAY)

4 14/01/20164 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002  STEP 2  DEPARTURE SLOTS (including overbooking) ARE ALLOCATED ACCORDINGLY BY ATFM (pretactical )

5 14/01/20165 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002  STEP 3  ATC CONTROLLERS REFINE TRAFFIC SEQUENCES AS APPROPRPIATE (tactical)

6 14/01/20166 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002  NOTE:  OVERBOOKING IS REQUIRED TO COMPENSATE UNPREDICTABLE, UNEXPECTED AND INACCURATE ELEMENTS such as:  AIRLINES DELAYS  FLIGHT CANCELLATIONS  BAD WEATHER

7 14/01/20167 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 HOWEVER OVERBOOKING AND INACCURACY CAN INDUCE HOLDING BEFORE LANDING THOSE DELAYS COULD BE ABSORBED EITHER :  IN HOLDING STACK (e.g. London)  LINEARY (e.g. Paris CDG)

8 14/01/20168 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 ARRIVING TRAFFIC TO PARIS CDG + LE BOURGET

9 14/01/20169 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 ARRIVING TRAFFIC TO PARIS CDG

10 14/01/201610 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 ARRIVING TRAFFIC TO PARIS ORLY

11 14/01/201611 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002  HOLDING STACK TECHNIQUE IS BEING USED AS AN AIRCRAFT TANK CLOSE TO RUNWAY FOR PREVENTING GAPS TO HAPPEN INTO LANDING SEQUENCES.  IT CAN BE USED EASILY WITHOUT ANY COMPUTER ASSISTANCE

12 14/01/201612 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002  HOLDING STACK INDUCES SIGNIFICANT EXTRA FUEL BURN  IT ENABLES LONG DELAYS ABSORPTION CAPABILITY

13 14/01/201613 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002  LINEAR HOLDING CAN ONLY ABSORB ‘REASONABLE’ DELAYS (5/7 minutes)  IT HAS TO BE COMPLEMENTED BY HOLDING STACK FOR LONGER DELAYS  IT IS VERY SUITABLE TO HUB SEQUENCES

14 14/01/201614 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002  IT IS SAVING FUEL EVEN COMPARED TO NOMINAL TRAJECTORY  IT REQUIRES COMPUTER ASSISTANCE FOR EFFICIENT SEQUENCING AND SPACING

15 14/01/201615 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002  PROGRESSIVE SPEED REDUCTION PROFILE  SEGMENTED SPEED PROFILE EXAMPLE OF AIRBUS A310 DESCENDING AT MINIMUM DRAG SPEED ACCORDING TO : SAVED FUEL BURN/ ABSORBED DELAYS

16 14/01/201616 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 TRANSITION ALTITUDE STANDARD DESCENT PROFILE M.;0,80 - 300 KT - 250 KT + HOLDING AT FL50 DESCENT PROFILE AT PROGRESSIVE REDUCED SPEED DESCENT PROFILE AT SEGMENTED SPEEDS HOLDING PROFILE 

17 14/01/201617 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 TYPICAL SPEED SEGMENTS

18 14/01/201618 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 ABSORBABLE DELAYS DURING DESCENT ONLY

19 14/01/201619 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 FUEL BENEFITS COMPARISON/STACK VERSUS LINEAR

20 14/01/201620 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 EXAMPLE OF COMPUTER ASSISTANCE INFORMATION GIVEN BY MAESTRO - ARRIVAL MANAGER Current Time Runway 25 (Le Bourget) Runway 26 left Time Scale Runway 27 (North)

21 14/01/201621 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 SEQUENCE DETAILS IAF (origin) (S = Susin, M = Merue, L = Lorta) Callsign Aircraft Type Time at IAF Current Delay

22 14/01/201622 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 WHAT MAGNITUDE OF BENEFITS COULD BE PROVIDED BY LINEAR HOLDING ?  THIS IS DEPENDING UPON AIRPORT AND DEMAND COMBINATION  HOWEVER SOME TYPICAL VALUES ARE ALREADY AVAILABLE

23 14/01/201623 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 IN NORMAL CONDITIONS LINEAR HOLDING ALLOWS FUEL SAVING OF 2x60’x85kg = 10,200 kg PER DAY AT PARIS ORLY AND 3x110’x85kg=28,050kg PER DAY AT PARIS CDG IN HEAVY SITUATION AT PARIS ORLY (100’ min Delay) 60’ OF LINEAR HOLDING ARE SAVING 60’X85kg = 5,100kg WHILE 40’ OF HOLDING STACK ARE INCREASING FUEL BURN BY 2,400kg AT PARIS CDG (225’ min Delay) 60’x85kg=5,100kg ARE SAVED WHILE 165’x60kg =9,900kg ARE LOST

24 14/01/201624 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 CONCLUSIONS  LINEAR HOLDING REDUCES FUEL BURN  IT WORKS IN REAL LIFE  ADDITIONAL BENEFITS CAN BE OBTAINED BY LINEAR HOLDING:

25 14/01/201625 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002  REDUCTION OF FLIGHT TIME AT LOW ALTITUDE  LOWERING NOISE  REDUCTION OF FLIGHT TIME IN THE HOLDING STACK  REDUCING RISK  LINEAR HOLDINGTHE WAY AHEAD

26 14/01/201626 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP Thank you !

Download ppt "14/01/20161 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid 21-22 May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP HOW TO SAVE FUEL."

Similar presentations

Flight Operations.

Flight Operations.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.

Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.
Destination : PARIS TMA Depending of what is your goal you want to achieve, there are several way of using an AMAN, design arrival procedures and create.

Destination : PARIS TMA Depending of what is your goal you want to achieve, there are several way of using an AMAN, design arrival procedures and create.
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )

Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-35/PIA3 Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide.

International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-35/PIA3 Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Traffic Management and FUA integration

Traffic Management and FUA integration
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva

Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Adrian BĂRZOI, Pilot SFO (A320,A330,A33X),BEng

Adrian BĂRZOI, Pilot SFO (A320,A330,A33X),BEng
Airline Planning Panel - Madrid 21-22 May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP Non-Revenue Flying Kevin M Morris.

Airline Planning Panel - Madrid May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP Non-Revenue Flying Kevin M Morris.
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )

Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.
International Civil Aviation Organization Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Saulo Da Silva Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology.

International Civil Aviation Organization Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Saulo Da Silva Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology.
Airspace Resource Allocation -Operations Impact Prof. R. John Hansman, Director MIT International Center for Air Transportation 617-253-2271.

Airspace Resource Allocation -Operations Impact Prof. R. John Hansman, Director MIT International Center for Air Transportation
Fuel Efficient Air Traffic Control Maryam Kamgarpour, PhD Student Claire Tomlin, Research Adviser John Robinson, NASA Ames Research Center December 17,

Fuel Efficient Air Traffic Control Maryam Kamgarpour, PhD Student Claire Tomlin, Research Adviser John Robinson, NASA Ames Research Center December 17,
SCHEDULING AIRCRAFT LANDING Mike Gerson Albina Shapiro.

SCHEDULING AIRCRAFT LANDING Mike Gerson Albina Shapiro.
Gate-to-Gate Project: Implementing Sequencing, Merging, and Spacing Captain Bob Hilb September 11, 2006.

Gate-to-Gate Project: Implementing Sequencing, Merging, and Spacing Captain Bob Hilb September 11, 2006.
Air traffic controllers (ATC) consideration and ATC solutions Session 5 Presentation 4.

Air traffic controllers (ATC) consideration and ATC solutions Session 5 Presentation 4.
EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE from Passenger Perspective or… I n t e r m o d a l i t y from Passenger Perspective or… PhD Thesis EUROCONTROL Experimental.

EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE from Passenger Perspective or… I n t e r m o d a l i t y from Passenger Perspective or… PhD Thesis EUROCONTROL Experimental.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-35/PIA3 Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide.

International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-35/PIA3 Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google