1. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 802.11 PAR Review SC November 2015 Date: 2015-11-02 November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 1 Authors:

2. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 Abstract-Snapshot Review of Proposed 802 PAR documents -- Nov 8-13, Dallas, TX, USA 1.802d - Amendment: URN Namespace, PAR and CSDPARCSD 2.802.1CQ- Standard: Multicast and Local Address Assignment, PAR and CSDPARCSD 3.802.3ca - Amendment, 25 Gb/s and 100 Gb/s Passive Optical Networks, PAR and CSDPARCSD 4.802.3cb - Amendment, 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Operation over Backplane and Copper Cables, PAR and CSDPARCSD 5.802.15.3d - 100Gbps wireless switched point-to-point physical layer, PAR Modification and 5CPAR Modification5C 6.802.15.4t Standard: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs) Amendment for a High(er) Rate Physical (PHY) Layer, PAR and CSDPARCSD 7.802.15.4u Amendment, Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR- WPANs) Amendment for use of the Indian 865-867 MHz band. PAR and CSDPARCSD 8.802.16s - Amendment, Fixed and Mobile Wireless Access in Channel Sizes up to 1.25 MHz, PAR and CSDPAR and CSD Meeting times: Monday PM2, Tuesday AM2, Thursday AM2 November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 2

3. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 PAR Review SC – November 2015 Chair: Jon Rosdahl Monday Agenda: 1.Welcome 2..Nominations for Vice Chair/Secretary 3.Determine order of review 4.Review PARs/CSD posted for review this week. 5.Recess Tuesday Agenda: 1.Determine Vice Chair/Secretary for this week and beyond 2.Complete review of PARs/CSD and post comments to 802 WGs 3.Recess Thursday Agenda: 1.Review Response to Comments 2.Prepare Report for 802.11 WG closing plenary 3.Adjourn November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 3 Draft Agenda:

4. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 PAR Review Comments November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 4

5. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 802.15.3d - 100Gbps wireless switched point-to-point physical layer, PAR Modification and 5CPAR Modification5C 2.1, 5.2a, 5.2b and 5.5: Use of “Mbps” or “ Gbps” should be “Mb/s” and “Gb/s” 5.2a and 5.2b seem to be orders of magnitude different in the expected speeds and bands covered. Should the Scope be amended by this amendment to include the extra bands and speeds? An Amendment is a good time to adjust the scope of the base standard. 5.5 – missing comma “In data centers wireless links ----” 5.5 – extra comma “…with high probability, is ----” 8.1 – 5.2b – delete “the” in “intended the frequency bands” 8.1 – 5.5 - missing comma in “kiosk-downloading the link” November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 5

6. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 802.15.4t Standard: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR- WPANs) Amendment for a High(er) Rate Physical (PHY) Layer, PAR and CSDPAR CSD 2.1 Need to include range for “High(er)” ( See NesCom Conventions: “6. Quantification of the Ranges of Numeric Values For PARs for new projects, standards developers who use general terms to represent ranges (e.g. high, medium, low) within the title, scope, or purpose, shall numerically define such ranges where they first appear (title, scope, or purpose, as applicable). “) 5.2a – change “devices operating various license-free” to “devices operating in various license-free” 5.2a – What is the battery consumption requirements (car battery or coin cell for example)? 5.2.b Change “Mbps” to “Mb/s” November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 6

7. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 15.4t CSD Title page: should it include the name of the amendment? 1.1.1 change “Definitions were already and part of this standard “ to “Definitions were already a part of this standard. November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 7

8. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 802.15.4u Amendment, Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR- WPANs) Amendment for use of the Indian 865-867 MHz band. PAR and CSDPAR CSD 2.1 Change “the Indian 865-867 MHz band” to “the 865-867 MHz band in the Republic of India.” 5.2b Add “Republic of” prior to “India”. 5.5 – Suggest use “W” for “watts” 5.5 – Change: “released a draft an Internet of Things Policy” to “released a draft Internet of Things Policy” November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 8

9. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 15.4u CSD Title page: should it include the name of the amendment? It would help the reader when looking at CSD to be self-defined. 1.1.1 change “Definitions were already and part of this standard “ to “Definitions were already a part of this standard” 1.2.5 a) change “This project can be implement with “ to “This project can be implemented with “ 1.2.5 a) Add comma prior to “which” November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 9

10. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 802.16s - Amendment, Fixed and Mobile Wireless Access in Channel Sizes up to 1.25 MHz, PAR and CSDPAR and CSD In 2014, 802.16 was in the process of closing down open projects. What evidence do we have for the support of a new project? 5.1 – We do not believe that there are 15 interested parties when 802.16 has only 6 members. There may not be enough interest to support this project. Are you expecting a lot of cross interest from the Micro-wave society? 7.1 – 3GPP develops NB-IOT (narrow band LTE for Internet of Things) which is similar in scope to this project scope – from 5.2b: “This system profile will specify operation in exclusively-licensed spectrum with channel sizes up to 1.25 MHz, including 1 MHz explicitly.” November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 10

11. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 802.16s CSD 1.2.1 a) How does this project justify the claimed market share of the cited studies, given that this appears to be one of many technologies in this competitive market place? 1.2.1 b) given that there are only 6 members of 802.16, that does not appear to match the list of “Multiple Vendors and numerous users” categories, what evidence of interests is there from participants in each category? 1.2.1 could be enhanced by including and building on the statement from 1.2.4 b) “At least five utilities in the US have either deployed or are testing a proprietary system based on a variation of IEEE 802.16 technology.” 1.2.4 – Concern that the statements are somewhat vague. Is there evidence that could be identified for the cited systems? How much of a Variation is the system cited? Could documents be cited from 802.16 document repository? November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 11

12. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 Responses From 802 WGs November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 12

13. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15-1212r1 References IEEE 802 PARs Under consideration Webpage: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/PARs.shtml November 2015 Jon Rosdahl, CSR-QualcommSlide 13