Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Progress report on Crank: Model building Biophysical Structural Chemistry Leiden University, The Netherlands.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Progress report on Crank: Model building Biophysical Structural Chemistry Leiden University, The Netherlands."— Presentation transcript:

1 Progress report on Crank: Model building Biophysical Structural Chemistry Leiden University, The Netherlands

2 Extending the limits of the SHELXCDE->ARP/wARP pipeline Resol. (Å) Anom. atoms Exp.Time (min) Residues RICE/SAD/FINAL MutS3.046 SeSAD156.2493/1093/1600 subtilisin1.773 Ca, SSAD55.656/259/275 thioesterase2.58 SeSAD (infl)86.7300/542/572 gere2.7512 SeMAD(p/i)28.8143/110/444 cyanase2.4140 SeMAD (p/i)69.4471/669/1560 thioesterase I1.8120 BrSAD(peak)65.4635/431/462 # Total Crank time for SAD target in the modied Refmac.

3 Earlier tests on Crank Pavol’s talk/results: all SAD examples can be automatically built (apart for SAD gere with peak). 33 test cases for SAD/MAD/SIRAS starting from substructure detection to model building: http://www.bfsc.leidenuniv.nl/software/crank/ (follow test link)

4 Preliminary results on JCSG with the CRANK in CCP4 6.1 Started with known heavy atom substructure, but unknown number of monomers/solvent content Using only default values: sequence, mtz, f’, f” only input First sets of jobs run: before substructure detection results (so, more input errors…) DISCLAIMER: analyzed last night after dinner until 3:30 a.m.!

5 Crank interfaces: UNIX script

6 Results from “CCP4” pipeline BP3->SOLOMON->PIRATE ->BUCCANEER 75 to 100 %28 48 % 50 to 74 %4 7 % 25 to 49 %11 16 % 0 to 24 %15 26 % Total:58 100 %

7 Results from “CCP4” pipeline BP3->SOLOMON->ARP/wARP 75 to 100 %45 66 % 50 to 74 % 7 10 % 25 to 49 % 5 7 % 0 to 24 %11 16 % Total:68 100 %

8 Issues to be addressed Used default number of building cycles: In some cases more of the model could be built with more cycles (i.e. flex-WARP) Hand determination failed a bit too many times (about 15). In my unsystematic analysis, SHELXE was better than SOLOMON.

9 Future work Getting windows version of crank Opening up Crank web server Feature freeze on crank and concentrate more on algorithmic developments: –AFRO Fa’s for SAD/MAD/unmerged data –BP3/Refmac phasing – expand multivariate approach (SIRAS/MAD – Pavol’s talk) –Refmac model building: Pavol’s talk

10 Crank Interfaces: web interface for Crank server (48 nodes)

11 Acknowledgements Cyttron Program authors: G. Sheldrick, G. Murshudov, V. Lamzin, A. Perrakis, K. Cowtan, P. Emsley and co-workers. R.A.G. de Graaff, I. Sikharulidze, P. Skubak, J.P. Abrahams, JCSG staff, Z. Dauter, and M. Weiss. Debugging/suggestions: CCP4 staff, Auto-Rickshaw guys, users.


Download ppt "Progress report on Crank: Model building Biophysical Structural Chemistry Leiden University, The Netherlands."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google