1. Psychology and Investigations Chapter 12

2. Psychologist’s Contributions  Investigative inferences  Offender profiling, geographical profiling, correlates of offence style  Investigative and legal process  Interviewing, predication of violence  Assessment of investigative and legal information  Eyewitness testimony, detecting deception

3. Criminal Profiling Criminal profiling is a technique for identifying the personality and behavioural features of an offender based on an analysis of the crimes they have committed Most frequently used in homicide and rape cases

4. Assumptions Individual behaviour and motivation can be predicted from the study of individuals who share similar behaviour and motivations Hypothesizes about demographic, motivational, & psychological features of the crime and offender

5. Criminal Profile Analysis Still at the crossroads between art or science  Popularity stems from films and television and few well publicized cases  The Silence of the Lambs  Copycat  Mindhunters  The X-Files  Criminal Minds  Can it be an efficient investigative technique?  Can it be studied scientifically?

6. Noted Experts James A. Brussel John Douglas Robert Ressler Roy Hazelwood David Canter

7. The Purposes of Profiling Provide characteristics of the offender Help analyze, understand crime scene Provide leads for investigators to follow Narrow the pool of viable subjects Prioritize investigation of subjects Develop interview, interrogation strategies Show links between crimes Provide supportive trial testimony

8. The Value of Profiling Surveys of police officers indicate profiling is useful in investigations (provides clues) Benefits of profiles include:  Provide a greater understanding of the case  Reinforce judgements about the offender Only 2.6% of respondents indicated that profiles led to the identification of the offender

9. Challenges of Profiling Turning info from crime scene into estimates of personality, age, work habits, of offender Modern personality tests can’t do this Not a scientific enterprise – largely intuition, experience Not thoroughly evaluated – utility unclear

10. Potential Problems with Profiling Many forms of profiling are based on a model of personality (the classic trait model) that lacks empirical support Profiles often contain ambiguous advice and such advice can be interpreted to fit a wide range of suspects Professional profilers do not always produce profiles that are more accurate than the profiles produced by novices

11. What Do We Know About Profiling? Crime scenes can often be accurately classified into broad categories (planned) Sometimes reveal info about a murderer (whether or not he knew his victim) Profiling may be useful in solving crimes with strong sexual component (sexual killings)  Revealed in killer’s “signature” activities Different profilers may produce different profiles  Not yet based on clear, systematic procedures

12. So What Don’t We Know? No good estimates of how often profiles have been useful or how often useless or counterproductive Error rates or rates of success difficult to evaluate  Some have led to arrest of guilty suspects  Some have led to arrest of innocent people  Some have pointed police in right direction  Some have led police astray and wasted time and resources Misuse of profiles poses clear dangers!  Subjective, stereotypical, or inaccurate profiles may lead to charges  Judges may use own profiles to decide what testimony to admit  Jurors may be guided by subjective profiles