1. Eurostat Standardisation within the ESS: SDMX present and future Luxembourg, October 2015 Marco Pellegrino Eurostat, Statistical Office of the European Union marco.pellegrino@ec.europa.eu

2. Eurostat Outline Evolution of SDMX Standards integration - Examples Opportunities and challenges - All good standards change 2

3. Eurostat 3 A model to describe statistical data and metadata A standard for automated communication from machine to machine A technology supporting standardised IT tools A common language for statistics Statisticians agree to use a common description for data and metadata The data exchange process is then driven by this common description Data descriptions are made available for everybody who wants to understand and reuse the data SDMX provides

4. Eurostat Why do we need a model? To define and describe statistical processes in a coherent way To standardize process terminology To compare and benchmark processes within and between organisations To identify synergies between processes To inform decisions on systems architectures and organisation of resources 4

5. Eurostat 5 The SDMX Components  Describe statistics in a standard way  Objects and their relationships  Data Structure Definition (DSD), Concepts, Code List  Central management and standard access  SDMX Registry, SDMX Web Services  Cross Domain Concepts  Cross Domain Code Lists  Statistical Domains  Metadata Common Vocabulary  Push  Provider generates and sends file to receiver  Pull  Provider opens web service to data  Receiver downloads regularly  Hub  Special case of pull: receiver downloads on end user request

6. Eurostat The same information is needed for exchange between different steps in a statistical production process. The use of SDMX throughout the process, in combination with a metadata registry (central storage of definitions, classifications, etc.) makes it more efficient and coherent to implement changes, e.g. in definitions Metadata-driven systems 6 Broadening the scope of SDMX

7. Eurostat  Standard metadata layer for the description and use of data and metadata throughout the process 7 Broadening the scope of SDMX

8. Eurostat GSBPM and SDMX: towards a more complete picture 8

9. Eurostat SDMX and standards integration SDMX promotes an incremental movement towards a data and metadata sharing model with the production of comparable and accurate statistics. The increasing use of SDMX: a) improves the quality of the statistical process b) enables simplified exchange and dissemination processes, improving timeliness and accessibility Statistical integration goes hand-in-hand with technical integration and standardisation. 9

10. Eurostat Building bridges 10 …not walls

11. Eurostat 11 Building bridges

12. Eurostat SDMX and Linked Open Data Based on RDF - Resource Description Framework - a family of specifications published by W3C allowing for machine-actionable, semantically rich linking of things found on the Web. Main RDF vocabulary for statistical data: → Data Cube Vocabulary Simplified version of the SDMX model covering data structures 12 https://open-data.europa.eu/en/linked-data Building bridges

13. SDMX Data Structure Definition RDF Data Cube Vocabulary http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-vocab-data-cube-20140116 SDMX Data Set structured by dimensionality

14. Latest Version The RDF Data Cube Vocabulary W3C Recommendation 16 January 2014 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-vocab-data-cube-20140116/ 14

15. 5 star-schema of Linked Open Data ★ Make your stuff available on the Web (whatever format) under an open license. ★★ Make it available as structured data (e.g., Excel instead of image scan of a table). ★★★ Use non-proprietary formats (e.g., CSV instead of Excel). ★★★★ Use URIs to denote things, so that people can point at your stuff. ★★★★★ Link your data to other data to provide context. Slide 15

16. The Data Cube Vocabul ary DataCube is a W3C recommendation, and has gained some momentum Data producers using SDMX can also publish in the Data Cube Vocabulary (DCV) As with any other RDF publication, the applications processing the RDF must understand the DCV data model to make sense of the data Therefore applications wishing to process any additional information added to the DCV triples need to understand the model of the attached data 16

17. The SDMX Perspective If you are using SDMX today (GESMES or XML), what does this mean? Most DataCube implementation today is being done by organizations that don’t use SDMX-ML For statistical organisations there is an increasing interest in RDF and there is a need to be able to integrate DataCube as an alternative query and delivery sourced originally from existing SDMX- based systems 17

18. SDMX and RDF: Scenario  RDF File Statistical Dissemination System Data Cube Writer SDMX-ML File SDMX-ML to RDF Transformer Either Or Using SDMX Component Architecture SDMX Writer Interface 18

19. Scenario  : Publish RDF triples as flat files Publish to a server exposed to the web Packaged in a meaningful way using named graphs Data by data set Structures (all in one file or codelists and concepts in one file and DSDs in another file Considerations Needs to be kept up to date (either republish as a replace or as an incremental update) Simple Approach but not easily queryable (discovery and linking tools typically work with SPARQL endpoints) 19

20. SDMX and RDF: Scenario  Triple Store (DataCube) Statistical Dissemination System RDF Service SPARQL SDMX-ML File SDMX-ML File to RDF Transformer Either Or Data Cube Writer SDMX Writer Interface 20

21. Scenario  : Populate a SPARQL endpoint Deploy RDF triple in a “triple store” Dedicated database system that natively understands SPARQL queries Supported by many RDF tools, some supporting a variety of flavours of RDF (XML, TURTLE, N-Triples) Data could be updated at the level of dataflow Considerations Good support for linking (the reason for LOD) Good support for cross dataflow queries Data with some common dimensions 21

22. Considerations If RDF is treated as a completely separate syntax, then the burden of data management is doubled If it is treated as a delivery format (just another data writer) then it is relatively easy to implement Up-front cost for tools development Low ongoing maintenance The benefits of RDF-based technology are realized in a cost-effective manner 22

23. Eurostat Data validation  “Technical” - Covered by SDMX today - Format Check (SDMX-ML) - Codes exist (SDMX DSD) - Codes used correctly (Dataflow & Constraint)  “Statistical Domain” - Not yet covered by SDMX (VTL) - Value check - Time series - Revisions - Validation expressions Building bridges

24. Eurostat VTL: Validation and Transformation Language 24 Standard language for defining validation and transformation rules Validation (now) Transformation (partially now, to be enriched at a later stage) Main goals Define and preserve validation and transformation rules Exchange and share rules Apply rules in industrialized processes Apply to several standards (e.g. SDMX, DDI, GSIM) thanks to a generic information model

25. Eurostat DDI is split into 2 branches: DDI-Codebook (DDI-C): DDI-C is a light-weight version of the standard, intended primarily to document simple survey data. DDI-Lifecycle (DDI-L or DDI 3+): DDI-L is designed to document and manage data across the entire life cycle, from conceptualization to data publication and analysis and beyond. DDI-L is currently being evaluated in several statistical organizations across the world. The DDI Lifecycle standard provides a data model for describing surveys in a very detailed fashion using XML. This can support many parts of the process of survey management particularly in the case of households surveys. E.g. exchange between question banks and data collection applications, generation of collection instruments, … 25 DDI: The Data Documentation Initiative

26. Eurostat  DDI: The DDI data lifecycle model 26

27. Eurostat SDMX and DDI SDMX can provide: Metadata describing the structure of dimensional data Stand-alone metadata sets (“reference metadata”) Formats for dimensional data A model of data reporting and dissemination Standard registry interfaces, providing a catalogue of resources Guidelines for deploying standard web services A way of describing statistical processes 27  DDI Lifecycle can provide a very detailed set of metadata, covering: Surveys and processing of microdata Structure of data files, including hierarchical files and complex relationships Archiving of data files and their metadata Tabulation and processing of data into tables Link between microdata variables and resulting aggregates Building bridges

28. Eurostat SDMX and DDI: similarities and differences Both standards use a similar model for identifiable, versionable and maintainable artefacts Both standards use “schemes”, as packages for lists of items, and XML “schemas” Both standards are designed to support reuse DDI has much more detailed metadata at the level of the study domain, and provides more complete descriptions of the processing of data SDMX provides more architectural components to support registration, reporting/collecting and exchange, and has a solid information model 28

29. 29

30. Other relevant standards Geospatial standards DDI SDMX GSIM Conceptual model Implementation standards 30

31. Eurostat Opportunities and challenges SDMX is interacting well with other standards (GSIM, DDI, RDF Linked Open Data, JSON) and this “complementarity” opens us new perspectives for the innovation of statistical processes. Common data validation and processing procedures are required (from structural validation to content). Better metadata-driven statistical production systems, with the use of standards throughout the processes in combination with a metadata registry. Better maintenance and developments of SDMX (e.g. support to use cases, new functions, more formats, etc.) using the wealth of its Information Model. 31

32. Eurostat All good standards change 32 September 2004April 2011November 2005 Version 2.0 SDMX-EDI SDMX-ML SDMX Registry Version 2.0 SDMX-EDI SDMX-ML SDMX Registry Version 1.0 GESMES/TS Version 1.0 GESMES/TS Too much change may discourage adoption But… not giving users the functionalities they want would also discourage adoption

33. Eurostat Where do we want SDMX to be, in 2020? “Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?” “That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,” said the Cat. “I don’t much care where–” said Alice. “Then it doesn’t matter which way you go,” said the Cat. “–so long as I get SOMEWHERE,” Alice added as an explanation. “Oh, you’re sure to do that,” said the Cat, “if you only walk long enough.” (Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Chapter 6) 33

34. Eurostat Where are we? Dramatic changes in the environment of official statistics producers (e.g. data deluge) Modernization of statistical information system seen as a question of survival for the sector of official statistics Standardization viewed as a key enabler for modernization Standards-based industrialization of statistical production 34

35. Eurostat SDMX 2020 Main challenges for the years to come: Strengthening implementation Facilitating data consumption Supporting statistical process innovation Enhancing communication Investing on training and capacity-building Action Plan SWG/TWG's work plan

36. Eurostat Thanks for your attention! Marco.Pellegrino@ec.europa.eu 36 SDMX present and future « If you are not sure where you are going you will finish someplace else »