Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Multiplicative Cascade Modeling of Computer Network Traffic Patricia H. Carter B10, NSWCCDD Interface 2002 April 19,2002.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Multiplicative Cascade Modeling of Computer Network Traffic Patricia H. Carter B10, NSWCCDD Interface 2002 April 19,2002."— Presentation transcript:

1 Multiplicative Cascade Modeling of Computer Network Traffic Patricia H. Carter B10, NSWCCDD Interface 2002 April 19,2002

2 outline network traffic data the multiplicative cascade visualizing the cascade measuring burstiness the structure function the multifractal spectrum conclusions

3 Wide Area Network traffic collection at enclave boundary Internet data collector Firewall Enclave traffic

4 Packet Rate Process TCP packets entering/leaving protected network raw data is arrival times packet rate process is # of packets/unit time

5 Three Resolutions of Packet Rate Data

6 Packet Rate Process “approximately” Log Normal – hour 12

7 Multiplicative Cascade: synthesis m p1-p pm (1-p)m P is a random variable from a distribution supported on [0,1] with mean ½ and variance v – conservative cascade

8 Multiplicative Cascade: analysis a+b 1-p=b/(a+b) a b If (a+b)=0 then choose p uniformly from {0,1}. p=a/(a+b)

9 Random Multiplicative Cascade 1 If the distributions are all the same, one example, chosen from the beta distribution whose density is p1-p p p 0 p (1-p 0 ) p 1 (1-p) (1-p 1 ) (1-p) p p 0,p 1 p 00,p 01,p 10,p 11 W0W0 W1W1 W2W2 distributions

10 Synthetic data – three realizations Random Multiplicative Cascade

11 the vector P of multipliers smallest scale p’s in time order Suppose packet rate process R has 2 L samples next smallest scale p’s Finally So the P and R are a “transform pair”.

12 Multipliers calculated via inverse cascade procedure

13 Multipliers Plotted as a Function of Scale – hour 0

14 Multipliers Plotted as a Function of Scale – hour 12

15 Log Variances of Multipliers versus Log Scale - Hour 12

16 Time-Scale Visualization Histogram-equalized

17 Histograms of Multipliers at Each Scale – Hour 0

18 Histograms of Multipliers at Each Scale – Hour 12

19 The Structure Function This assumes the multiplier distributions are the same at every scale, but they aren’t.

20 Multiple Scale Structure Function Where are the multipliers calculated at level M.

21 Multiple Scale Structure Functions

22 Histograms of Variance- Normalized Multipliers

23 Multiple Scale Structure Functions From Variance-Normalized p’s

24 Multifractal Spectrum define “the Legendre transform”

25 Empirical Approximation to the Multifractal Spectrum - hour 12 F(alpha) v alpha

26 Multiplicative Cascade Spectrum Abs fbm

27 Multiple Scale Structure Functions – abs FBM

28 Empirical Approximation to the Multifractal Spectrum – abs fbm

29 Multiplicative Cascade Spectrum Abs fBm with smoothing

30 Multifractal Spectrum – Smoothed fBm

31 Empirical Approximation to the Multifractal Spectrum – Weibull

32 Observations/Conclusions I The packet rate and the multiplicative cascade are a transform pair. The multiplicative cascade is an appropriate model: packet rate is positive, so can be interpreted as a measure over many scales of resolution it is approximately log normal The multiplicative cascade is an useful model if it can be implemented in with a small number of parameters determined by the data of interest: if the log of the variance is linear in log scale then the variance is determined by two parameters at each scale the multipliers can be modeled via a one parameter family, e.g., the symmetric beta distribution - the one parameter is a function of the variance

33 Observations/Conclusions II The multiple scale structure function was useful; the multifractal spectrum was not so useful. The visualization of the multipliers in time and scale does not convey a lot – the time domain visualization conveys more information


Download ppt "Multiplicative Cascade Modeling of Computer Network Traffic Patricia H. Carter B10, NSWCCDD Interface 2002 April 19,2002."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google