1. MSE Performance Metrics and Tentative Results Summary Joint Technical Committee Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Pacific Biological Station, DFO School of Resource and Environmental Management, SFU

2. Outline Summarize the hake MSE Example simulations Performance metrics Summary figures

3. Objectives of the MSE Use the 2012 base case as the operating model. As defined in May 2120 – Evaluate the performance of the harvest control rule – Evaluate the performance of annual, relative to biennial survey frequency.

4. Organization of MSE Simulations Operating Model *Stock dynamics *Fishery dynamics *True population Management Strategy *Data choices ** Stock Assessment *Harvest control rule CatchData Performance Statistics *Conservation objectives *Yield objectives *Stability objectives Feedback Loop * Use the MPD (not posterior medians, or other quantiles) for applying the harvest control rule

6. Example MSE run 1

7. But remember – starting points are not the same

8. Example MSE Run II

9. Measuring Performance Choose metrics that capture the tradeoffs between conservation, variability in catch and total yield for specific time periods. Define short, medium and long time periods as Short=2013-2015, Medium=2016-2020, Long=2021-2030. The main conservation metric is the proportion of years depletion is below 10% The main variability in catch metric is the Average Annual Variability in catch for a given time period. For yield we used the median average catch We’ve chosen what we think are the top six. We’d like to discuss if others are needed.

10. Key Performance Statistics Medium 2016-2020Perfect InformationAnnualBiennial Median average depletion28%27%28% Proportion of years below SB10%1%7%6% Proportion of years between SB10% and SB40%70%61%58% Proportion of years above SB40%29%32%36% Median Average Annual Variability (AAV) in catch23%35%36% Median Average Catch216219211

11. Other available options First quartile depletion Third quartile depletion Median final depletion Median of lowest depletion Median of lowest perceived depletion First quartile of lowest depletion Third quartile of lowest depletion First quartile of AAV in catch Third quartile of AAV in catch First quartile of average catch Third quartile of average catch Median of lowest catch levels First quartile of lowest catch levels Third quartile of lowest catch levels Proportion with any depletion below SB10% Proportion perceived to have any depletion below SB10%

12. Statistics Break - Medians vs Means

13. Average Annual Variability in Catch (illustration)

14. Perfect Information Case We created a reference, perfect information case where we simulated data with no error The purpose of the perfect information case was as follows: – To separate observation vs process error i.e. variable data don’t affect management procedure performance – to provide a standard relative to which a comparison of the test (biennial and annual) cases could be made

15. Perfect information (con’t)

18. Comparisons of Depletion, Catch and AAV for All Cases

21. Summary for long-term depletion

22. Summary for long term AAV

23. Summary for long-term catch

24. Discussion Does the groups want alternative performance statistics considered Progress and next steps