Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chinese–European Investment Regulation: Progress in a Fragmented Area of Law copyright: Bertram Boie Why do Swiss banks complain about.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chinese–European Investment Regulation: Progress in a Fragmented Area of Law copyright: Bertram Boie Why do Swiss banks complain about."— Presentation transcript:

1 Chinese–European Investment Regulation: Progress in a Fragmented Area of Law copyright: Bertram Boie bertram.boie@wti.org Why do Swiss banks complain about limited business opportunities on the Chinese market? Why are investors‘ intellectual property rights in China under threat? In which forum are international rules for investment negotiated? What are the issues for Switzerland and Europe if Chinese investors increase their presence on the European market? Why do sweatshops and sub-standard production remain a problem in China? ? ? ? ? ? The dynamic investment exchange involving Europe and China raises many different, important questions: Which rules are applicable to these questions? What are the main shortcomings of and possible solutions offered by these rules? My research approach breaks down (some of) these questions into three main dimensions of fragmentation of law: QUESTIONS RESEARCH ANSWERS Overall, the dynamic investment exchange between Europe and China is not catered for by an appropriate legal framework. International rules on investment are fragmented, scattered and narrowly focused on investment protection. In more detail: First Dimension of Fragmentation: Proliferation of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) Worldwide, a non-transparent net of nearly 3000 bilateral investment treaties regulates (mostly) international investment protection. In the EU-Chinese context, 25 such treaties co-exist, without any coordination or coherence. Second Dimension of Fragmentation: Investment Law v. other Branches of International Economic Law While trade matters are covered by WTO rules, investment rules are scattered over various agreements and stakeholders. In the EU-Chinese context, an analysis of the coverage of intellectual property rules by trade rules (WTO/TRIPS) and investment rules (BITs) gives evidence of overlaps and inconsistencies. Third Dimension of Fragmentation: Investment Law v. other Law, such as Human Rights or Environmental Law International investment treaties today address mostly investment protection and do not feature exceptions to these protection rules for non-economic societal values (environment, social issues, workers‘ rights). For the EU-Chinese context, this means that investors are bound only by national laws, and their often lax enforcement. (My research is mostly about EU-China relations, but since there are no major differences in investment policies between EU countries and Switzerland, my research applies to the EU and Switzerland alike) European–Chinese BITs need to be better coordinated and streamlined. My research gives an indication as to how. On the matter of IP – crucial for the EU-Chinese context – the borderlines between TRIPS and BITs need to be better defined. My research offers one possible proposition as to how this could be done. My research finds that the inclusion of clauses on non-economic values in EU- Chinese BITs is a difficult aspiration. It says why, and frames the emerging questions. 132 132

2 The Fragmentation of International Investment Law in three Dimensions copyright: Bertram Boie bertram.boie@wti.org


Download ppt "Chinese–European Investment Regulation: Progress in a Fragmented Area of Law copyright: Bertram Boie Why do Swiss banks complain about."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google