Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL RUNOFF

Published byAllan Lee Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL RUNOFF"— Presentation transcript:

1 DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL RUNOFF e-mail : todini@geomin.unibo.it
MODELS APPLIED TO THE DARGLE Prof. Eng. Ezio TODINI

2 DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELLING
Rainfall Runoff Models Black Box M. Semi Distributed M. Distributed M. Advantages of Distributed Models Physical meaning of model parameters Distributed representation of phenomena Limited calibration requirements Possibility of internal analysis

3 Model 1: AFFDEF Main model characteristics:
Mass Balance in each cell Main model characteristics: Modified CN for estimating infiltration Radiation method for evapotranspiration Muskingum-Cunge for ovrland and channel flow

4 Main model characteristics Vertical lumping of hydraulic conductivity
Model 2: TOPKAPI Main model characteristics Vertical lumping of hydraulic conductivity Dunne infiltration Soil horizontal flow, overland and channel flows represented using a kinematic equation Horizontal lumping of kinematic equations Model for the single cell

5 TOPKAPI Distributed approach The model for the single cell
SOIL COMPONENT mass conservation moment conservation ODE

6 TOPKAPI Distributed approach The model for the single cell
SURFACE COMPONENT mass conservation moment conservation … ODE

7 TOPKAPI Distributed approach The model for the single cell
CHANNEL COMPONENT mass conservation moment conservation … ODE

8 TOPKAPI Distributed approach Parameters

9 Model 3: MIKE SHE Main model characteristics: 1D Richards equations for unsaturated zone 3D Boussinesq equation for greoundwater Parabolic approximation for overland flow

10 Case study The Dargle Republic of Eireland County of Wicklow

11 Elevation from 20 m to 713 m a.s.l. Sandy and sandy loam for about
Case study - Surface Area circa 122 km2 Elevation from 20 m to 713 m a.s.l. Sandy and sandy loam for about 1.5 m

12 Saturation mechanism Dunne Horton
The “unrealistic” profile used in MIKE SHE to meet the observations

13 Results: AFFDEF Efficiency Coefficients Variance of obs. = 17.85
Variance of errors= Nash Sutcliffe= Explained Variance= Coefficient of correlation =0.91 Volume Control = Willmott= Efficiency Coefficients

14 Uniform value for curve number: 20
Risults: AFFDEF 5 [Km2 ] Areal threshold Average computer time = 5 min Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity 0.01 [ms-1] Variance of obs. = Variance of errors= Nash Sutcliffe= Explained Variance= Coefficient of correlation =0.91 Volume Control = Willmott= Efficiency Coefficients Infiltration Res. Const [s] Infiltration constant Infiltration Capacity Uniform value for curve number: 20

15 Results: TOPKAPI Efficiency Coefficients Variance of obs. = 17.85
Variance of errors= Nash Sutcliffe= Explained Variance= Coefficient of correlation =0.91 Volume Control = Willmott= Efficiency Coefficients

16 Results: TOPKAPI Average comp. time = 5 min Permeability [m3s-1] θS θR
α L [m] Soil Type 9.1E-04 0.453 0.041 2.5 0.9 Sandy Loam 0.7 3.1E-05 1.5 0.463 0.020 1.0 Loam 4.1E-05 Average comp. time = 5 min Variance of obs. = Variance of errors= Nash Sutcliffe= Explained Variance= Coefficient of correlation =0.91 Volume Control = Willmott= Efficiency Coefficients

17 Results: MIKE SHE Efficiency Coefficients Variance of obs. = 17.85
Variance of errors= Nash Sutcliffe= Explained Variance= Coefficient of correlation =0.85 Volume Control = Willmott= Efficiency Coefficients

18 Results: MIKE SHE Average computer time = 2.5 h
Variance of obs. = Variance of errors= Nash Sutcliffe= Explained Variance= Coefficient of correlation =0.85 Volume Control = Willmott= Efficiency Coefficients Thickness of soil layer -1.3 [m] Horizontal hydraulic conductivity 5*10-4 [m s-1] Vertical hydraulic conductivity 1*10-5 [m s-1] Storativity coefficient 0.2 [m-1]

19 Distributed soil moisture
Saturation percentage

20 TOPKAPI CALIBRATION TOOL

21 Example of link ECMWF -TOPKAPI on the Po Basin
The basin closed at Ponte Spessa (Surface area 36,900 km2 ) Ponte Spessa

22 The Soil Types The Land Uses
The DEM The Land Uses

23 Reproduction of the 1994 event in the Po river

24 ECMWF: deterministic run

25 ECMWF: deterministic run

26 ECMWF: deterministic run

27 ECMWF: deterministic run

28 ECMWF: deterministic run

Download ppt "DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL RUNOFF"

Similar presentations

A Model for Evaluating the Impacts of Spatial and Temporal Land Use Changes on Water Quality at Watershed Scale Jae-Pil Cho and Saied Mostaghimi 07/29/2003.

A Model for Evaluating the Impacts of Spatial and Temporal Land Use Changes on Water Quality at Watershed Scale Jae-Pil Cho and Saied Mostaghimi 07/29/2003.
Hydrologic Analysis Dr. Bedient CEVE 101 Fall 2013.

Hydrologic Analysis Dr. Bedient CEVE 101 Fall 2013.
Application of the FEWS Stream Flow (SF) Model to the Limpopo Basin, Mozambique Final Report Tanya Hoogerwerf.

Application of the FEWS Stream Flow (SF) Model to the Limpopo Basin, Mozambique Final Report Tanya Hoogerwerf.
Infiltration and unsaturated flow Learning objective Be able to calculate infiltration, infiltration capacity and runoff rates using the methods described.

Infiltration and unsaturated flow Learning objective Be able to calculate infiltration, infiltration capacity and runoff rates using the methods described.
1 A physically based distributed model at the REW scale and application to Oklahoma region Murugesu Sivapalan Fuqiang Tian Hongyi Li Department of Geography.

1 A physically based distributed model at the REW scale and application to Oklahoma region Murugesu Sivapalan Fuqiang Tian Hongyi Li Department of Geography.
Assessing the impact of a soil surface crust on simulated overland flow at the field scale. N. Chahinian (1, 2), M. Voltz (2), R. Moussa (2), G. Trotoux.

Assessing the impact of a soil surface crust on simulated overland flow at the field scale. N. Chahinian (1, 2), M. Voltz (2), R. Moussa (2), G. Trotoux.
z = -50 cm, ψ = -100 cm, h = z + ψ = -50cm + -100cm = -150 cm Which direction will water flow? 25 cm define z = 0 at soil surface h = z + ψ = 0 + -200cm.

z = -50 cm, ψ = -100 cm, h = z + ψ = -50cm cm = -150 cm Which direction will water flow? 25 cm define z = 0 at soil surface h = z + ψ = cm.
Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA)

Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA)
Estimating Catchment Runoff Storm Surface depression storage Infiltration Initial abstraction Direct runoff or Effective rainfall Losses.

Estimating Catchment Runoff Storm Surface depression storage Infiltration Initial abstraction Direct runoff or Effective rainfall Losses.
Runoff and Streamflow P Q

Runoff and Streamflow P Q
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.

Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
Infiltration Infiltration is the process by which water penetrates from ground surface into the soil. Infiltration rate is governed by: rainfall rate hydraulic.

Infiltration Infiltration is the process by which water penetrates from ground surface into the soil. Infiltration rate is governed by: rainfall rate hydraulic.
Introduction The agricultural practice of field tillage has dramatic effects on surface hydrologic properties, significantly altering the processes of.

Introduction The agricultural practice of field tillage has dramatic effects on surface hydrologic properties, significantly altering the processes of.
Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling Topography and Physical runoff generation processes (TOPMODEL) Raster calculation of wetness index Raster.

Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling Topography and Physical runoff generation processes (TOPMODEL) Raster calculation of wetness index Raster.
The Effect of Soil Hydraulic Properties and Deep Seepage Losses on Drainage Flow using DRAINMOD Debjani Deb 26 th April, 2004.

The Effect of Soil Hydraulic Properties and Deep Seepage Losses on Drainage Flow using DRAINMOD Debjani Deb 26 th April, 2004.
A Process-Based Transfer Function Approach to Model Tile Drain Hydrographs Mazdak Arabi, Jennifer Schmidt and Rao S. Govindaraju World Water & Environmental.

A Process-Based Transfer Function Approach to Model Tile Drain Hydrographs Mazdak Arabi, Jennifer Schmidt and Rao S. Govindaraju World Water & Environmental.
Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney

Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney
Soil physics Magnus Persson. Surface tension   2·R·cos  R 2·r P1P1 P2P2 z Due to surface tension water can be held at negative pressure in capillary.

Soil physics Magnus Persson. Surface tension   2·R·cos  R 2·r P1P1 P2P2 z Due to surface tension water can be held at negative pressure in capillary.
Infiltration Rainwater that soaks into the ground and may reach the groundwater table.

Infiltration Rainwater that soaks into the ground and may reach the groundwater table.
The University of MississippiNational Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering Rainfall runoff modeling in agricultural watershed using 2D.

The University of MississippiNational Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering Rainfall runoff modeling in agricultural watershed using 2D.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google