Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Parliament House Canberra 18 & 19 May 2005 BTRE introduction - William Lu Transport infrastructure and growth.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Parliament House Canberra 18 & 19 May 2005 BTRE introduction - William Lu Transport infrastructure and growth."— Presentation transcript:

1 Parliament House Canberra 18 & 19 May 2005 BTRE introduction - William Lu Transport infrastructure and growth

2 Infrastructure and growth  the issue is highly contentious  focus of the debate is how and to what degree transport infrastructure affects growth  keys to understanding : –macroeconomic perspective –microeconomic perspective –general equilibrium perspective

3 Macroeconomic perspective  treat transport infrastructure as an additional variable in the aggregate growth function (or cost function)  test whether and to what extent infrastructure affects output  empirical results have been so far highly variable, depending on spatial and temporal conditions  an emerging consensus is that, for a mature economy with well developed transport systems, the contribution of transport infrastructure investment to output growth is likely to be modest

4 Macro perspective (cont’d)  useful in revealing the full effects of infrastructure investments, but it has limitations: –lack of transparency (black box) –specification problems (causality, functional forms & dynamics) –sensitive to data selected for estimation –an ex-post estimate –an aggregate measure  caution should be adopted when using macro results to infer future transport infrastructure investment needs

5 Microeconomic perspective  measures the benefits of infrastructure improvements from savings in both transport and non-transport inputs at the firm level  both of these areas of savings will enhance economic performance  traditional tool is benefit-cost analysis (BCA)

6 Micro perspective (cont’d)  direct (1st-order) benefits – savings in time, VOCs and accident costs  indirect (2nd-order) benefits – savings from logistical reorganisation (inventory, warehouse and firm relocation) – economies of scale/scope are key drivers behind these indirect benefits – often omitted in practical BCA at the project level Source: Lakshmanan, et al. 2002 Source: Lakshmanan, et al. 2002 Transport infrastructure improvement Reduced distancesReduced congestionOther externalities Cheaper, more reliable transport services Logistical improvements Facilities consolidation Location effectsValue added effects

7 General equilibrium perspective General equilibrium effects occur when cost reductions or improvements in transport services result in economy-wide adjustments in such a way to increase aggregate productivity

8 General equilibrium (cont’d) New insights from the recent literature:  gains from trade –comparative advantage (Neo-classical) –scale economies and imperfect competition (New Economic Geography)  gains from innovation and technology (The Endogenous Growth Theory) However, most GE models currently in use do not have these sorts of sophistication and are expensive to run

9 Summary  macroeconomic: full effects but a black box  microeconomic: transparent, but indirect effects may be overlooked  general equilibrium: economies of scale/scope and imperfect competition as possible sources of further gains  the three perspectives, if considered in a complementary fashion, would enrich our understanding of the critical relationship between transport infrastructure investment and economic growth.

10 – END


Download ppt "Parliament House Canberra 18 & 19 May 2005 BTRE introduction - William Lu Transport infrastructure and growth."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google