Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDwain Roberts Modified over 8 years ago
1
COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION TREATMENT GUIDELINES IN AFRICA Eran Bendavid Philip Grant, Annie Talbot, Douglas Owens, Andrew Zolopa Stanford University
2
Motivation (1) – new guidelines 2 When to start: CD4 count of 350 cells/mm 3 What to start: one of four regimens containing AZT, TDF, NVP, or EFV What not to start: regimens containing d4T
3
Motivation (2) – resource environment 3
4
Next few slides 4 Framing the question Approach 1. Model structure 2. Assumptions Results 1. Comparative effectiveness 2. Cost-effectiveness Implications
5
Evaluating the WHO guidelines 5 What is the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the 1 st line regimens recommended in the new guidelines, as well as the regimen in most common use? 1. Tenofovir + lamivudine + efavirenz (TDF/3TC/EFV) 2. Tenofovir + lamivudine + nevirapine (TDF/3TC/NVP) 3. Zidovudine + lamivudine + efavirenz (AZT/3TC/EFV) 4. Zidovudine+ lamivudine+ nevirapine (AZT/3TC/NVP) 5. Stavudine + lamivudine + nevirapine (d4T/3TC/NVP)
6
Model structure Badri (Lancet 2006), Lawn (AIDS 2009), Holmes (JAIDS 2006) 6 Simulation of HIV disease and treatment calibrated to South African data Simulated individual patient histories Calculate population average life expectancies, quality-adjusted life expectancies, and costs A few illustrative patient histories look like this…
7
Simulation example 7 Start ART Failure Tuberculosis CD4 log VL
8
Model structure 7 Start ART Failure Tuberculosis CD4 log VL
9
Simulation example 7 Start ART Failure PCP 2 nd line Toxicity CMV CD4 log VL
10
TB + blip Start ART Simulation example 7 log VL CD4
11
Simulation example 7 Start ART CD4 log VL
12
Assumption 1 – virologic failure Gallant (NEJM 2006, JAMA 2004), Smith (JID 2005 ), Arribas (JAIDS 2008), Nachega (AIDS 2008) 8 RegimenFailure (Yr1)Failure ( Yr3) TDF/3TC/EFV12% (8-16%)24% (16-32%) TDF/3TC/NVP18% (12-24%)31% (22-40%) AZT/3TC/EFV17% (10-24%)31% (20-42%) AZT/3TC/NVP25%(16-34%)46% (32-60%) d4T/3TC/NVP18% (12-24%)31% (22-40%)
13
Assumption 2 – toxicities Haubrich (AIDS 2009), Arribas (JAIDS 2008), Gallant (JAMA 2004, NEJM 2006), Amoroso (CROI 2007) 9 RegimenToxicitiesRate (1 year)Substitution TDF/3TC/EFV Lipoatrophy Renal failure 6% 1% No substitution TDF → AZT TDF/3TC/NVP Lipoatrophy Renal failure Hepatotoxicity 6% 1% 6.3% No substitution TDF → AZT NVP → EFV AZT/3TC/EFV Lipoatrophy Anemia 23% 6% AZT → TDF AZT/3TC/NVP Lipoatrophy Anemia Hepatotoxicity 23% 6% 6.3% AZT → TDF NVP → EFV d4T/3TC/NVP Lipoatrophy Neuropathy Lactic acidosis Hepatotoxicity 30% 25% 0.5% 6.3% d4T → TDF NVP → EFV
14
Assumption 3 - costs WHO, Global Price Reporting Mechanism 10 Annual regimen costs are substantially different TDF/3TC/EFV : $675 TDF/3TC/NVP : $538 AZT/3TC/EFV : $384 AZT/3TC/NVP : $247 d4T/3TC/NVP : $121
15
Results – comparative effectiveness 11 RegimenQuality- adjustedlife years (disc.) Life years (discounted) Mean number of opportunistic diseases TDF/3TC/EFV11.2712.822.03 TDF/3TC/NVP11.0812.542.18 AZT/3TC/EFV10.6912.722.07 AZT/3TC/NVP10.4712.392.22 d4T/3TC/NVP10.3112.512.17
16
Results – cost-effectiveness 12 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 11.0 11.2 11.4 7,5008,0008,5009,0009,50010,000 Lifetime costs (Discounted 2009 USD) Discounted QALYs AZT/3TC/NVP d4T/3TC/NVP
17
Results – cost-effectiveness 12 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 11.0 11.2 11.4 7,5008,0008,5009,0009,50010,000 Lifetime costs (Discounted 2009 USD) Discounted QALYs AZT/3TC/NVP d4T/3TC/NVP TDF/3TC/NVP $1,045/QALY gained
18
Results – cost-effectiveness 12 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 11.0 11.2 11.4 7,5008,0008,5009,0009,50010,000 Lifetime costs (Discounted 2009 USD) Discounted QALYs AZT/3TC/NVP d4T/3TC/NVP TDF/3TC/NVP $1,045/QALY gained AZT/3TC/EFV
19
Results – cost-effectiveness 12 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 11.0 11.2 11.4 7,5008,0008,5009,0009,50010,000 Lifetime costs (Discounted 2009 USD) Discounted QALYs AZT/3TC/NVP d4T/3TC/NVP TDF/3TC/NVP $1,045/QALY gained AZT/3TC/EFV TDF/3TC/EFV $5,950/QALY gained
20
Implications 13 d4T-containing regimens are more expensive and less effective than AZT-containing regimens, supporting their elimination from the guidelines While there are no trials directly comparing AZT/3TC/EFV with TDF/3TC/NVP, the latter appears to be more effective and less costly than the former under a broad set of assumptions Consideration should be given to recommending TDF/3TC/NVP over AZT/3TC/EFV in usual circumstances Using World Health Organization thresholds for cost-effectiveness TDF/3TC/NVP may be considered cost-effective in most African settings, but AZT/3TC/NVP is the least costly regimen
21
In Collaboration With Philip Grant – Stanford Infectious Diseases Annie Talbot – Stanford Infectious Diseases Doug Owens – Stanford Health Policy Andrew Zolopa – Stanford Infectious Diseases Acknowledgment National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
23
Assumption 1 – virologic failure 8 RegimenFailureYr1FailureYr3Range TDF/3TC/NVP18%31%12-24%, 22-40% AZT/3TC/EFV17%31%10-24%, 21-41% AZT/3TC/NVP25%46%16-34%, 32-60% d4T/3TC/NVP18%31%12-24%, 22-40% TDF/3TC/EFV12%24%8-16%,16-32%
24
Results – comparative effectiveness 11 RegimenQuality- adjusted life years (disc.) Life expectancy (discounted) Mean number of opportunistic diseases TDF/3TC/EFV11.2712.822.03 TDF/3TC/NVP11.0812.542.18 AZT/3TC/EFV10.6912.722.07 AZT/3TC/NVP10.4712.392.22 d4T/3TC/NVP10.3112.512.17
25
Results – comparative effectiveness 11
26
Assumption 1 – virologic failure 8 Risk of virologic failure varies by ART regimen Lowest failure: tenofovir + lamivudine + efavirenz 2 nd lowest: zidovudine + lamivudine + efavirenz 3 rd and 4 th lowest: tenofovir + lamivudine + nevirapine ; stavudine + lamivudine + nevirapine Highest failure: zidovudine + lamivudine + nevirapine
27
Assumption 2 of 3 9 ARV drugs have associated risk of toxicities Stavudine (lipoatrophy, neuropathy, lactic acidosis) Zidovudine (lipoatrophy, anemia) Tenofovir (lipoatrophy, renal failure) Nevirapine (hepatotoxicity) Quality of life is decreased with toxicities (least with lipoatrophy, most with lactic acidosis)
28
TDF/3TC/EFV 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 11.0 11.2 11.4 7,5008,0008,5009,0009,50010,000 Lifetime costs (Discounted 2009 USD) Discounted QALYs TDF/3TC/NVP AZT/3TC/EFV AZT/3TC/NVP d4T/3TC/NVP $1,045/QALY gained $5,950/QALY gained
29
Next few slides 29 Framing the question (1 slide) Approach 1. Model structure (2 slides) 2. Assumptions (3 slides) Results and implications 1. Comparative effectiveness (2 slides) 2. Cost-effectiveness (2 slides)
30
Assumption 1 – virologic failure 8 RegimenFailure Yr 1Failure Yr 3Range TDF/3TC/EFV12%24%8-16%, 16-32% TDF/3TC/NVP18%31%12-24%, 22-40% AZT/3TC/EFV17%31%10-24%, 21-41% AZT/3TC/NVP25%46%16-34%, 32-60% d4T/3TC/NVP18%31%12-24%, 22-40%
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.