Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Explaining party systems The role of electoral systems.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Explaining party systems The role of electoral systems."— Presentation transcript:

1 Explaining party systems The role of electoral systems

2 Core explanations Party systems are a product of cleavage and cleavage structure OR Electoral systems shape party systems

3 Impact of cleavages Cleavage structure matters, but.. Not all cleavages are politicized or organized Some parties organize around cleavages (cleavage-based parties) while others try to bridge or blur them What parties and other entities do makes a difference

4 Alternate supposition: Electoral systems determine the number of parties (stronger version) OR Electoral systems influence the number of parties (more muted, weaker version)

5 The impact of electoral laws: Duverger’s law: –Single member plurality (SMP) > two party system –PR > multiparty system Is it valid? Factors to consider: –District magnitude –Effective thresholds

6 Varieties of electoral laws: District systems: –Single member plurality (SMP, first past the post) –Single member majority: Double ballot or runoff systems – e.g. France –Abs. majority required on 1 st ballot; lower candidates dropped –Plurality on 2 nd ballot PR –Single transferable vote (STV) – used in Ireland, Malta, proposed for British Columbia –List systems

7 Single transferable vote (STV) Multi-member districts (in Ireland 3-4 members) Voters express 1 st, 2 nd. 3rd preferences To be elected a candidate must –Secure a minimum quota: Droop quota = V/(s + 1) –Surplus votes for winning candidates transferred to 2 nd choices, candidates securing quota are elected… –Surplus votes transferred again. –If no candidate has a surplus, the lowest candidate is eliminated and his/her votes transferred –Process continues until all seats are filled

8 PR List systems and their variants: Impact of district magnitude Counting formulas –Highest averages –Highest remainders –St. Lague system (Scandinavia – uses special divisors Pooling arrangements; tiers – e.g. Denmark, Sweden –to deal with remainders Formal Thresholds: –Germany 5% –Sweden 4% –Denmark 2%

9 Alternate member (AMS) or mixed- member proportional systems (MMP) Germany: Half the Bundestag elected in single member districts, via SMP Second half elected in 2 nd, simultaneous ballot: Results of 2 nd ballot used to make the final distribution of seats proportional to the vote received by parties which have either –won 5% of the vote in the second ballot or –won 3 seats on the first (constituency) ballot

10 New Zealand

11

12

13


Download ppt "Explaining party systems The role of electoral systems."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google