Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Pelatihan : Techniques in Active Tectonic Study Juni 20-Juli 2, 2013 Instruktur: Prof. J Ramon Arrowsmith (JRA) Dari Arizona State University (ASU) - US.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Pelatihan : Techniques in Active Tectonic Study Juni 20-Juli 2, 2013 Instruktur: Prof. J Ramon Arrowsmith (JRA) Dari Arizona State University (ASU) - US."— Presentation transcript:

1 Pelatihan : Techniques in Active Tectonic Study Juni 20-Juli 2, 2013 Instruktur: Prof. J Ramon Arrowsmith (JRA) Dari Arizona State University (ASU) - US Tempat Pelaksanaan: Ruang Pangea, Laboratorium Gempabumi (LabEarth) – Puslit Geoteknologi LIPI dan Kuliah lapangan akan dilakukan disekitar Sesar Lembang, Jawa Barat. * Lebih jelas baca TOR/KAK dan daftar acara

2 Earthquake Recurrence Outline of this lecture Simple models of earthquake recurrence Segmentation Earthquake rate models: Gutenberg-Richter and Characteristic Earthquake recurrence simulation

3 Simple Earthquake Machine

4 Subduction earthquake cycle

5 A. Periodic earthquake model in which stress levels at the time of rupture and after it are known. These yield a predictable time and slip for each earthquake. B. Time-predictable model based on a consistent stress level at which failure occurs. Stress drop and slip magnitude are unpredictable, but given previous slip, time until the next earthquake (with unknown slip) is predictable. C. Slip-predictable model based on a consistent stress level at the end of an earthquake. Given time since the last rupture, magnitude of slip is predictable. Modified after Shimaki and Nakata (1980) Burbank and Anderson

6 Burbank and Anderson, 2011, Tectonic Geomorphology, Chapter 4

7

8 Burbank and Anderson Basic fault segmentation

9 Fault zone is comprised of heterogeneous non coplanar fault surfaces bounding oblate blocks whose geometry and activity varies in time and space Map view mode II step (bend) Cross- section view mode III step (bend) 3D mixed mode stepover Strong influences on Stress and displacement fields around the fault surfaces Further development and linkage Fluid flow Rupture dynamics Fault zone strength Questions: Geometric—Fault surface and block shapes and sizes Time—How long are they active? What is slip history? Block motion history? Development—Linkage and evolution of roughness

10 Predicting the endpoints of earthquake ruptures (I) Wesnousky, 2006

11 Predicting the endpoints of earthquake ruptures (II) Wesnousky, 2006 “stop light color scheme” About 2/3 rupture terminations are associated with discontinuities or fault ends Step size

12 Megathrust earthquake segmentation model for Indonesia region (Irsyam et.al., 2010)

13 Estimated maximum magnitude and slip rate of faults in Indonesia (Irsyam et.al, 2010)

14 Earthquake magnitude and frequency: Earthquake rate model

15 1984 “…individual faults and fault segments tend to generate essentially the same size or characteristic earthquakes having a relatively narrow range of magnitudes near the maximum” given fault geometry Full Rupture of seismogenic width of fault Zielke and Arrowsmith, 2008

16 High resolution satellite imagery based offset reconstruction along Fuyun Fault, China

17 Approximately 2kyr recurrence interval

18 Burbank and Anderson If we know slip rate du/dt And we assume u(x) per event We can get recurrence time u ave or u max per event should also imply length and M

19 Synoptic view of continental shear zone (Scholz, 1988)

20 Burbank and Anderson, 2011, Tectonic Geomorphology, Chapter 4 Modified from Zielke and Arrowsmith, 2008

21 Burbank and Anderson, 2011, Tectonic Geomorphology, Chapter 4 Modified from Zielke and Arrowsmith, 2008

22 Thatcher, 1990 Zielke and Arrowsmith, 2008; Zielke, 2009 Quasi-static earthquake simulator using elastic dislocations with stress boundary conditions and simple friction produces synthetic earthquake catalogue (900,000 events > 5km 2 over 540kyr; cumulative stress history) So what do these earthquakes look like along the fault over time?

23

24 Bimodal Seismicity Distribution Down-dip rupture width RW of small EQs is limited by z p Rupture of strength barrier z p causes activation of full seismic zone  Abrupt increase in RW and RA at transition from small to large EQs  Abrupt increase in Magnitude Mag. vs. Freq. RW vs. Freq. Small vs. Large EQ

25 Moderate M, partial rupture, Gutenberg-Richter Large M, full rupture, Characteristic Zielke and Arrowsmith, 2008 Implies bimodal M, RA, and slip at surface->controlling influence of event on landscape


Download ppt "Pelatihan : Techniques in Active Tectonic Study Juni 20-Juli 2, 2013 Instruktur: Prof. J Ramon Arrowsmith (JRA) Dari Arizona State University (ASU) - US."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google