1. Attention Part 2
Page

2. What Happens to Unattended Stimuli?
Evidence from Neglect Patients. Shown some pictures to the non-neglected visual field and others to the neglected visual field. Later asked to identify the same pictures in a degraded version. They are just as fast with those that had been presented to the neglected as the non-neglected visual field (priming).
cogch3 Attention

3. Neurological evidence also indicates that when the overall attentional load of a task was low, neglect patients showed increased brain activity to task irrelevant items presented in the neglected visual field (some processing is going on) even though the patients are not consciously aware of the stimuli.
cogch3 Attention

4. Hemi neglect Patients Suffering From 'Hemi
-neglect' Ignore Things On Their
Left, But They See Them Nonetheless
Click here to see Science Daily article (05/15/08.)
This study demonstrates that in hemi-neglect the left part of the world is not a 'blind' region: in a way, patients read unconsciously what is there. However, the patients cannot make conscious use of this information
cogch3 Attention

5. Attention as Capacity Factors effecting allocation of Attention
Attention is the process of allocating mental resources to various cognitive tasks
Factors effecting allocation of Attention
Anxiety
Salience and Distinctiveness
Relevance
Task demands
cogch3 Attention

6. Cross- Modality Effects
Ventriloquist Illusion Rubber Hand Illusion Phantom Limb Pain (begin at 13:00) Body Swap Illusion
cogch3 Attention

7. Disorders of Visual Attention
Hemi-neglect – (Historical note) President Woodrow Wilson after suffering two strokes developed hemi neglect. When colleagues came to visit him, he failed to respond to them until they were escorted to his right side. He denied he had a problem and planned to run for a third term as president until his wife finally intervened.
cogch3 Attention

8. Spatial Extinction: can detect a single item in both the left and right visual fields but, under conditions of double simultaneous stimulation they fail to detect the item in the left field.
Presented
Perceived
cogch3 Attention

9. When stimuli is presented in the neglected field but has no competition for attention from the non- neglected visual field, the image is perceived. When there is competition for attention from the non- neglected visual field, attention is given only to the non-neglected visual field.
cogch3 Attention

10. Two Attention Systems (Corbetta)
Goal directed system - preparing and applying goal-directed (top-down) selection for stimuli and responses. Effected by expectations, knowledge and/or intentions. Stimulus driven – (bottom-up) specialized for the detection of behaviorally relevant stimuli, particularly when they are salient or unexpected. Circuit breaker .
cogch3 Attention

11. The area were the two attention systems combine is in the parietal lobe. There is competition for attention from the two attentional systems. Hemi- neglect can occur due to impairment in either the goal-directed or the stimulus driven systems. Results in a failure to activate the parietal cortex enough to capture attention to that visual filed. Hemi-neglect is a disorder of Attention – not of perception.
cogch3 Attention

12. Reducing Neglect: Physiotherapy
Hemi-neglect patients when asked to point straight ahead – point several degrees to the left.
Prism glasses that shift the visual field 10 degrees to the right allow patients to use the Goal-directed (top-down) processes to direct more attention to the neglected left visual field.
cogch3 Attention

13. Demonstration I will show you a scene quickly.
Report first the black numbers.
Report what you see at each of the 4 locations.
Mask
+++

14. +++++

17. Report first the black numbers.
Report what you saw at each of the 4 locations.

18. Illusionary conjunctions
We tend to put different features from different objects together.
Some brain damaged patients (parietal lobe) show illusionary conjunctions even when the patients were allowed to view the stimuli for 10 seconds.

19. Feature Integration Theory
Find the Green X X O X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Feature search
Conjunction search
Treisman & Gelade 1980

20. Which is more difficult?
Find

21. Which is more difficult?
Find

22. Typical Findings & interpretation
Feature targets pop out
flat display size function
Conjunction targets demand serial search
non-zero slope

23. Feature integration theory
Attention is the “glue” that combines the information from the what and where systems.

24. cogch3 Attention

25. Multi-tasking
Ophir et al (2009) Correlation between multitasking and distractibility. When asked to do two tasks at once, participants who reported being multitaskers performed less well on the main task than did non- multitaskers. Perhaps multi-taskers are just less able to focus attention.
cogch3 Attention

26. Cell Phone Use
Hyman et al (2009) Cell phone users less likely (25%) than non-users (51%) to notice a unicyling clown!!!
cogch3 Attention

27. Practice and Dual Task Performance
Spelke, Neisser et al (1976) Two subjects read short stories while writing lists of words at dictation. After some weeks of practice, they were able to write words, discover relations among dictated words, and categorize words for meaning, while reading for comprehension at normal speed. The performance of these subjects is not consistent with the notion that there are fixed limits to attentional capacity.
cogch3 Attention

28. Automatic vs. Controlled
Automatic Processes
Fast and efficient
Unavailable to consciousness
Unavoidable
Unintentional
Controlled Processes
Slow and less efficient
Available to consciousness
Controllable
Intentional

29. Attention as executive control
In contrast to capacity theories (which see attention as a limitation) considering it as executive control of possibly conflicting multiple goals makes attention instead a source of efficiency
Evidence: Psychological Refractory Period

30. Psychological Refractory Period
2 stimuli and 2 responses
Light: press button
Tone: press foot pedal
Varying SOAs
At short SOAs, response to task 2 takes longer
Varying stimulus processing difficulty
Lengthening processing of stimulus 1 slows RT to stimulus 2
Lengthening processing of stimulus 2 does not slow response to stimulus 2!!

31. PRP: Surprising Results
Processing
Of Stimulus
Central
Executive
Response
to Stimulus S1 R1 S2 R2 S1 R1 S2 R2
Central Executive: response selection process S1 R1 S2 R2