Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Three-Tier Model of Student Intervention Training (NMPED’s Guidance Framework) An Exploration of the SAT Process October 2, 2015 Presented by: Myra L.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Three-Tier Model of Student Intervention Training (NMPED’s Guidance Framework) An Exploration of the SAT Process October 2, 2015 Presented by: Myra L."— Presentation transcript:

1 Three-Tier Model of Student Intervention Training (NMPED’s Guidance Framework) An Exploration of the SAT Process October 2, 2015 Presented by: Myra L. Martinez, Associate Superintendent Vivian Valencia, Instructional Coach Maryellen Fresquez, Instructional Coach

2 Introductions Please introduce yourself to 4 people that you do not know. Let them know: 1.Who are you? 2.Where do you teach? 3.What is your positon? 4.What do you expect to learn today? Please remember to write down your partners names? You will need a 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock appointment for later activities.

3 1.Tier 1: All Students Activity 1 2.Tier 2: Referred Students Activity 2 3.Tier 3: Identified Students 4.PED Online Resources and Samples 5.Forms 6.Timeline Expectations Exit Activity

4

5 Universal Screening: General health and well-being English language/home language proficiency Academic proficiency using multiple measures Core Instruction with Differentiation and Interventions as Identified by Data: Core instruction for all students High-yield, instructional strategies Differentiated Instruction Enrichment Activities Culturally and linguistically responsive instruction Interventions as identified by data School-Wide Behavioral System with Interventions and Positive Support: School code of conduct Classroom rules School-wide behavioral Programs Bullying prevention policy/programs Monitoring of office discipline referrals (ODRS) and attendance data School wellness policy

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13 Tier I: Notes about English Learners (ELs)

14 Tier I: Decision Considerations Locally devised implementation plan. The district has developed and outlined its general implementation plan with timelines. Schools are responsible for implementation at the site level within the scope of the district timeline requirements. As each school implements the SAT process at the local level, PLC and SAT teams play an essential role in determining its data-based decision rules for when interventions should be changed and when students should move from Tier 1 to Tier 2 or Tier 3 or reverse course The complete Espanola Public Schools SAT Implementation Plan for Tier I, II and III referral will be presented at the end of this session.

15 Tier I: Decision Considerations

16 Page 8

17 What are your Wows! What have you learned thus far? What are your wonders? What is not clear?

18

19 The focus of Tier 2 is to provide strategic and individualized support for at-risk students (struggling or significantly advanced) for whom Tier 1 instruction and universal interventions prove insufficient. A school-based team called the Student Assistance Team (SAT) gathers all available data about a student who is not making sufficient progress in Tier 1, develops an hypothesis regarding a possible cause for the problem, and then designs an individualized SAT intervention plan and/or behavioral intervention plan (BIP), as necessary.

20 It is important to note that a SAT intervention plan or BIP could be required for a student performing below or above grade level expectations. By identifying students who could benefit from more intensive interventions, the SAT process helps students remain and succeed in the general education program and reduce unnecessary or inappropriate referrals to special education.

21 Summary Students receiving Tier 2 services continue to receive Tier 1 instruction, but with the benefit of more targeted, intensive interventions prescribed by the SAT intervention plan or BIP. These interventions should be provided by the classroom teacher or in combination with other appropriate staff in the school to address academic skill or behavioral needs. The individualized SAT intervention plan or BIP increases intensity for a student—that is, they increase frequency and duration of the interventions, reduce group size, and/or use specialists to deliver the intervention. Tier 2 also provides for frequent and specific progress- monitoring of interventions, so that timely adjustments can be made for the at-risk student, if needed.

22

23 STEP 1: Referral to SAT Coordinator A student may be referred to SAT for academic and/or behavioral reasons. A teacher must complete a SAT referral packet and submit it to the SAT coordinator at the school site.

24 STEP 2: SAT Referral Packet Review and Certification The SAT coordinator review the referral packet, collects all relevant information and determines if the data meets the certification for Tier 2 Academic and/or behavioral interventions which have already been implemented must be documented as well as multiple data points demonstrating a lack of student progress over time. The SAT coordinator should consider student work samples; documentation of parent contacts; results of universal screening, including vision and hearing screenings; student attendance data; discipline records; student performance reports, any observations or interviews and any other relevant data. The referral demonstrates that the student has received core instruction with differentiation and interventions and/or behavioral interventions with lack of progress over time, then the SAT coordinator certified the referral.

25 Step 3: The SAT Meeting SAT coordinator ensures that the student’s parents, teachers, and other SAT members are notified of the meeting in advance. All communication with parents should be conducted in a language the parent can understand. The initial SAT should cover the following items: 1.Referring teacher shares the reason for student’s referral. 2.SAT systematically reviews and discusses all relevant data about the student. 3.Referring teacher should share interventions implemented and the progress monitoring data. 4.SAT (including the parent) develops one or more hypotheses about why the student is struggling. 5.After reviewing the data the SAT makes one or more of the following decisions: The student appears to need no new interventions and no Tier 2 plan is necessary. The student’s challenges suggest a SAT intervention plan or BIP is warranted. The existing data is insufficient for a complete determination. The referring teacher must provide additional information. Refer the student for a multidisciplinary evaluation due to an obvious disability.

26 Step 4: Implement and Monitor Interventions 1.SAT intervention plan and/or BIP is implemented. 2.A follow up SAT meeting is coordinated. 3.Student’s response to intervention is progress monitored and graphed in two week increments. 4.After approximately nine weeks (with at least four data points) a follow- up SAT should be scheduled to determine the effectiveness of the intervention to determine if there is a positive trend in the student’s learning. 5.After examining the data points at the follow-up SAT meeting, the SAT determines outcomes.

27

28

29

30

31

32 Page 15

33 What are your Wows! What have you learned thus far? What are your wonders? What is not clear?

34

35

36 The Eligibility Determination Evaluation Process: Data from the SAT must be considered in making the eligibility determination for Tier 3 services. Once a student is referred to Tier 3, with written parental consent and prior written notice, a multidisciplinary evaluation is completed. Following evaluation, the Eligibility Determination Team uses the available data from the multidisciplinary report, the SAT, and any other data sources to determine eligibility for special education and related services under the criteria of one or more of the 13 categories of disabilities as defined by IDEA, the New Mexico Technical Evaluation and Assessment Manual, and or the state criteria for gifted.

37

38

39

40

41

42 Visit http://ped.state.nm.us/ped/index.html and select the A-Z directory. Select Response to Intervention (RtI)http://ped.state.nm.us/ped/index.html

43 Visit http://ped.state.nm.us/ped/index.html and select the A-Z directory. Select Response to Intervention (RtI), then Select Forms and Resources.http://ped.state.nm.us/ped/index.html

44 Pre SAT Data Review - TIER I (Teacher Responsibility per the PLC Process) Student Profile Teacher Form Data Collection Universal Vision and Hearing Screening SAT Referral (Teacher Responsibility) - TIER II Elementary School Referral Middle/High School Referral SAT Referral (SAT Chair Responsibility) Student Observation Hearing Screening and Referral Vision Screening and Referral Notice of and Invitation to SAT Meeting Initial SAT Meeting Forms (Team Input, SAT Chair Leads) Initial SAT Meeting Summary SAT Action/Intervention Plan Overview Consent for SAT Assessments/ Interventions SAT Follow Up Meeting Forms (Team Input, SAT Chair Leads) SAT Follow-up Summary (Repeat as necessary) SAT Follow-up Summary SAT Referral to Testing Referral for TIER III consideration (SAT Chair and Principal Responsibility) Confirmation of Fidelity Student Case History Referral for Evaluation SAT Log + “NO, Not Now” PWN is documented by SAT Chair/Principal. Copy of form must be delivered to SPED department within 3 days of SAT Meeting.

45 SAT Referral Form 1.1 Elementary 1.2 Secondary

46 Exit Activity: 1.As a school team please complete the Wows! Wonders? School Next Steps and District Next Steps Activity. 2.Group Share 3.Principals and team leaders, please take a picture and email the picture to myra.martinez@k12espanola.org before leaving. Information will be shared with district directors and leadership team.myra.martinez@k12espanola.org

47 Thank You …


Download ppt "Three-Tier Model of Student Intervention Training (NMPED’s Guidance Framework) An Exploration of the SAT Process October 2, 2015 Presented by: Myra L."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google