Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Finding z  6.5 galaxies with HST’s WFC3 and their implication on reionization Mark Richardson.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Finding z  6.5 galaxies with HST’s WFC3 and their implication on reionization Mark Richardson."— Presentation transcript:

1 Finding z  6.5 galaxies with HST’s WFC3 and their implication on reionization Mark Richardson

2 “Possible Low-Z starz in High-z z’-drop galaziez”

3 Outline WFC3 in the IR LBGs Data Results SFR Shechter (Luminosity) Function Reionization

4 Note Paper 1  Probing ~ L * Lyman-Break Galaxies at z~7 in GOODS-South with WFC3 on HST Paper 2  The Contribution of High Redshift Galaxies to Cosmic Reionization: New Results from Deep WFC3 Imaging of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field

5 Hubble Two previous detectors on Hubble used in these texts: ACS & NICMOS ACS: Large detecting area, UV to NIR (~0.85μ), efficient NICMOS: Small FOV, NIR (up to ~1.6μ) http://www.edcheung.com/job/sm4/wfpc/wfpc.htm

6 Hubble WFC3: Installed May 2009, Larger FOV than NICMOS, smaller FOV than ACS; same spectral range as NICMOS Used Y,J,H bands with WFC3, although Paper 1 used Y(0.98μm) whereas Paper 2 used Y(1.05μm). Note (in μm): ACS B = 0.435 V = 0.606 i ~ 0.740 Z = 0.850 NICMOS Y ~ 1. J ~ 1.25 H ~ 1.6 WFC3 Y = 0.98 or 1.05 J = 1.25 H = 1.60

7 http://www.stsci.edu/hst/proposing/documents/primer/Ch_49.html#1924814

8 Transmission efficiency for relevant filters

9

10

11 High Redshift Observations How do we find high-z objects? Lyman-alpha emission (narrow band) Lyman-break (broad band) Gamma-Ray bursts (GR observatories) Lyman-Break Galaxies: Cue: Mark meet Board … 3 Filters at low-z vs. 2 Filters at high-z

12 Lyman break Galaxies So for high-z (z > 5) galaxies: No detection below filter with 1216A(1+z): Let’s call this a ‘UV detection’ Detections in and above filter with 1216A(1+z) Expect bluer colours in filters above 1216A(1+z) than most other sources.

13 Data Selection Criteria: Paper I: z-Y>0.8 Paper II: z-Y>1.3 T-L dwarf & Low-z rejection Criteria Paper I: Y-J~< 1.0 Paper II: z-Y ~>3.6(Y-J)-0.8 OR >2 Low-z rejection Criteria No UV detections

14 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

15 Results Paper I: Considered FOV of GOODS-South: 20 arcmin 2 148 objects: 55 spurious, 79 have detections in B and V, 8 in i, 6 in z 8 in i are likely z~6 galaxies (some previously confirmed) 6 in z are likely z~7 galaxies. Further supported since objects not in MIPS 24μm (corresponds to ~3μm if z~7 correct)

16

17 Results Paper II: Considered FOV of HUDF: 4.18 arcmin 2 110 objects: 35 spurious, 55 have detections in B and V, 8 in i, 12 in z 8 in i are likely z~6 galaxies (some previously confirmed) 10 in z are likely z~7 galaxies. One in z is likely a transient object (compare with NICMOS), another is likely a T or L dwarf.

18

19

20 Determining UV flux & SFR For z=7, L UV can be determined from Y Madau et al. 98 show that after enough time the equilibrium: L UV = const*SFR is reached Paper I: SFRs in the range of 5-10 M o /yr Paper II: SFRs in the range of 1- 4 M o /yr with one object having a SFR of 8M o /yr --> Total SFR in field = 29.6 M o /yr Assumptions???

21 Schechter Function We wish to describe the number density of galaxies with luminosity between L and L+dL: Parameters: z~7 Φ * = 0.0011 Mpc -3 α = -1.73 M UV * = -19.8

22 Reionization Cosmological history: recombination, reionization, today Possible sources of reionization: AGN -- likely not: densities too low Star formation early in the Universe But evidence of Luminosity function evolution seems to contradict this.

23 Reionization Madau et al 98 give the necessary SFR density to provide reionization: ρ SFR = (0.005M o yr -1 Mpc -3 /f esc )([1+z]/8) 3 (Ω b h 70 2 /0.0457)(C/5) Considering Paper II, with a FOV of 4.2 arcmin 2 and a z-range of 6.7-8.8, the 29.6 M o /yr observed are taking place in a volume of ~18000Mpc giving a SFR density of ~ 0.0017M o yr -1 Mpc -3 Considering the assumptions that go into this a value of 0.0035- 0.004 M o yr -1 Mpc -3 is more likely (if not higher)

24 Results Thus the observed UV flux is too low to account for reionization by factors of a few. Possible resolution: f esc is very high, or faint end slope of Luminosity function is much steeper than given before. Two last possible solutions: low metallicity or top-heavy IMF

25 Extra results Z~8 results (y-drops)

26 Sources Wilkens, Stephen M. et al, Probing ~L * Lyman-break Galaxies at z ~ 7 in GOODS-South with WFC3 on HST, arXiv: 0910.1098v3, Dec 2009 Bunker, Andrew J. et al, The Contribution of high Redshift Galaxies to Cosmic Reionization: New Results from Deep WFC3 Imaging of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field, arXiv:0909.2255v3, Dec 2009 Luminosity Function lecture from Phil Armitage, university of Colorado in Boulder, http://jila.colorado.edu/~pja/astr3830/index.html http://jila.colorado.edu/~pja/astr3830/index.html http://www.astro.ku.dk/~jfynbo/LBG.html WFC3 info: http://www.edcheung.com/job/sm4/wfpc/wfpc.htmhttp://www.edcheung.com/job/sm4/wfpc/wfpc.htm WFC3 vs ACS: http://www.stsci.edu/hst/proposing/documents/primer/Ch_49.html#1924814http://www.stsci.edu/hst/proposing/documents/primer/Ch_49.html#1924814 ACS filters: http://adcam.pha.jhu.edu/instrument/filters/http://adcam.pha.jhu.edu/instrument/filters/ GRB: Wikipedia


Download ppt "Finding z  6.5 galaxies with HST’s WFC3 and their implication on reionization Mark Richardson."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google