1. Map Mod Indiana Status Next counties up Fountain Parke Randolph Martin Ripley

2. The Paradigm Shift: Map Mod to Risk MAP

3. What is Risk MAP? 3 Through collaboration with State, Local, and Tribal entities, Risk MAP will deliver quality data that increases public awareness and leads to action that reduces risk to life and property.

4. Risk MAP is Science Based Risk MAP is here because new science is available that enables FEMA to: Develop reliable and accurate maps to identify communities’ risks More fully assess the level of flood risk that communities face Provide guidance to help communities develop better plans for mitigating risk Arm communities with the tools and information needed to communicate about risk and mitigation more clearly and confidently to their constituents 4

5. Engineering and Mapping Engineering and Mapping (E&M) includes: Updated data for 100% of Nation’s populated coast Current data for 80% of the NFIP stream inventory Three types of E&M Levee Coastal Riverine Why E&M? More precise and accurate maps More effective risk assessments Better mitigation plans Helps communities better understand their risk. Uses science to more accurately show risk on a map. It is the data that supports FEMA and its maps. 5

6. Prioritize Projects Prioritization includes: 2010: Based on risk, need, data availability 2011: Based on algorithm of risk, need, community contribution Enables FEMA to: Acquire data for future projects Develop products for high risk, need areas Leverage previous efforts Consider stakeholder input Provide technical assistance Provides a more scientific, transparent approach to identify communities to study and map. 6

7. What is the Watershed Approach? Uses the watershed as a study framework Evaluation of need to include unstudied stream reaches connecting multiple studied stream reaches within a watershed Areas for data processing may be identified on a watershed basis Aligns FEMA with agencies and the scientific community who already use a watershed approach. Watershed Approach 7

8. Elevation data includes: Inventory of existing elevation data Acquisition of elevation data on a watershed basis based on risk, need, and contribution Partnering to cost-share data acquisition and processing Increases the reliability of FEMA’s science to provide a more accurate picture of risk. Elevation Data Acquisition 8

9. Mitigation Planning Mitigation planning activities includes: Local mitigation planning support Revised guidance Community incentives Participation by nontraditional stakeholders in project lifecycle Products: National repository for Mitigation Plans Method to monitor risk reduction activities National Community Toolkit for Hazard Mitigation Planning Backed by better science, mitigation plans are more informed and actionable. 9

10. Risk Communications The science behind Risk MAP provides the foundation for communicating about risk reduction. Risk communications includes: Tools to strengthen community capability to communicate about risk A foundation for local risk communications Improves communications: Between FEMA and communities Between communities in a watershed Within communities Risk MAP Products: Project communication assessment tool Project communication planning tool Customizable fact sheets 10

11. 11 Program Goals and Measures Ensure 80 percent of the Nation’s flood hazards are current by 2014 – the flood hazard data are new, have been updated, or deemed still valid through Risk MAP review and update process Goal 1: Data Gaps Address gaps in flood hazard data Increase State, local, and Tribal officials’ level of understanding of flood risk Goal 2: Awareness & Understanding Measurable increase of public awareness & understanding Ensure 80 percent of the U.S. population (excluding territories) is covered by a Local or Tribal hazard mitigation plan that is approved or approvable pending adoption Goal 3: Mitigation Planning Lead effective engagement in Mitigation Planning Percent of Local hazard mitigation plans approved using quality Risk MAP data or better Goal 4: Digital Platform Provide an enhanced digital platform Establish a culture of continuous improvement and executing projects aimed at reducing process cycle time and improving the quality of Risk MAP products and services Goal 5: Synergize Programs Align Risk Analysis programs and develop synergies Risk MAP GoalsRisk MAP Measures

12. Risk MAP Process

13. Risk MAP Products Flood Risk Assessment Data Flood Depth & Analysis Grids Changes Since Last FIRM Data Areas of Mitigation Interest Flood Risk Report Flood Risk Map Ad-Hoc Flood Risk Analyses Flood Risk Database

14. Risk MAP Datasets Changes since last FIRM Depth grids (10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year) Percent Annual Chance Percent Chance over 30-years Depth grids (2-, 5-, and 200-year) (enhanced product) Depth grids (1%+) (enhanced product) Velocity grids (enhanced product) Annualized Depth (enhanced product)

15. Changes Since Last FIRM Identify areas and types of SFHA change between current effective/previous SFHAs and proposed/new SFHAs A visual comparison of old and new SFHAs Offers stakeholders transparency

16. Changes Since Last FIRM Structures added

17. Flood Depth Grid Increase flood risk awareness by communicating that risk varies within the mapped floodplain Final product can include 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 200-, and 500-year events Provides the necessary input for damage analysis

18. 500-year Flood Depth Grid SR19 (2’) Neighborhoods (1-4’) School (<1’) Hospital (<1’) Above 500-yr but no access Fields (10-15’)

19. Percent Annual Chance > 10% < 1% 2% to 5% < 0.2%

20. Percent Chance Over 30 Years 100% chance (1 in 1 odds) 11-25% chance (1 in 10 to 1 in 4 odds) 76-99% chance (3 in 4 to almost 1 in 1 odds) More than 1 in 4 odds

21. Relationship: Return Interval -to- % Chance During 30 Years Risk of Flood at Least Once During 30 Year Time Period Equivalent Average Risk of Flood in Any Given Year Tolerable % Chance Approximate Odds % Chance Every Year Average Recurrence Interval Odds 3 %1 in 300.1 %1,000 yr≠1 in 1,000 5.8 %1 in 200.2 %500 yr≠1 in 500 14 %1 in 70.5 %200 yr≠1 in 200 26 %1 in 41.0 %100 yr≠1 in 100

22. Outreach Discovery Meetings (scoping, time & cost meeting expanded) Mapping & Engineering meeting – discuss the results of the engineering analysis before the maps are issued to the public. Flood Risk Open House – similar to what is done now Post Preliminary mitigation meeting – discuss the actions the community could take to reduce risk, based on the new analyses.

23. Risk MAP Wabash River Discovery Meetings Joint venture between Indiana DNR & Illinois State Water Survey Includes Lower Wabash and Middle Wabash / Busseron Watersheds (HUC8) Two “high level meetings” with federal / state stakeholders (Silver Jackets in Indiana Fall 2010) Six local meetings with local stakeholders

24. Risk MAP Discovery: Lower White River Watershed

25. Discovery meeting highlights 6 separate meetings with local stakeholders(2 sets of 3, Washington, Bloomfield & Spencer) 2 meetings with Indiana Silver Jacket team 4 meetings were videotaped Discovery report and Flood Risk Map

27. 27 What is CNMS? Goal: – Produce a National inventory database of flooding sources corresponding to our mapping inventory that: Tracks program status on NVUE. Informs map planning production decisions - References mapped flooding sources as valid or as having an unmet need. Serve as FEMA’s mapping needs management system - MNUSS will be sunset. Document accomplishments - Resolution date of existing mapping needs will be captured.

28. Coordinated Needs Management Strategy Geospatial database of mapping needs Includes all streams draining greater than 1 sq mi DOW now working on final QA of initial data Validation of selected counties to be complete by March 2011 Used for planning for future mapping efforts

29. 29 CNMS in FY11 and Beyond FEMA Regional Funding Allocations will be influenced by CNMS data in FY11 – Completion of stream-level validation is critical Continuous Lifecycle Validation – Annual maintenance cycle of validation information to monitor inventory decay rate based on 5-year assessment cycle For example, starting in FY11 effective studies from FY06 should undergo validation process Web-Based Application – Front-end application that allows easier interaction with CNMS data for non-GIS savvy users – Still being proposed at program level

30. LOMR Delegation DOW staff would review FEMA LOMR applications for FEMA Staff has attended training Target implementation in FY 2011 Advantages: Reduce overall processing time Local review Access to agent/reviewer

31. Indiana Floodplain Information Portal infip.dnr.in.gov New interface and base map complete 6 counties of flood elevation points complete eFARA and floodplain ordinance support now operational