Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

VOLTAMMETRY A.) Comparison of Voltammetry to Other Electrochemical Methods 1.) Voltammetry: electrochemical method in which information about an analyte.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "VOLTAMMETRY A.) Comparison of Voltammetry to Other Electrochemical Methods 1.) Voltammetry: electrochemical method in which information about an analyte."— Presentation transcript:

1 VOLTAMMETRY A.) Comparison of Voltammetry to Other Electrochemical Methods 1.) Voltammetry: electrochemical method in which information about an analyte is obtained by measuring current (i) as a function of applied potential - only a small amount of sample (analyte) is used Instrumentation – Three electrodes in solution containing analyte Working electrode: microelectrode whose potential is varied with time Reference electrode: potential remains constant (Ag/AgCl electrode or calomel) Counter electrode: electrode (Hg, Pt, C) that completes circuit, conducts e - from signal source through solution to the working electrode Supporting electrolyte: excess of nonreactive electrolyte to conduct current −NaCl or KCl in aqueous solvent −Tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6) in non-aqueous solvent (e.g., MeCN, DMSO, DMF)

2 VOLTAMMETRY Instrumentation – Three electrodes in solution containing analyte

3 Apply Linear Potential with Time Observe Current Changes with Applied Potential 2.) Differences from Other Electrochemical Methods a) Potentiometry: measure potential of sample or system at or near zero current. voltammetry – measure current as a change in potential b) Coulometry: use up all of analyte in process of measurement at fixed current or potential voltammetry – use only small amount of analyte while vary potential

4 3.) Voltammetry first reported in 1922 by Czech Chemist Jaroslav Heyrovsky (The Father of Polarography) Later given Nobel Prize (1959) for method. B.) Theory of Voltammetry 1.) Excitation Source: potential set by instrument (working electrode) - establishes concentration of Reduced and Oxidized Species at electrode based on Nernst Equation: - reaction at the surface of the electrode E electrode = E 0 - log 0.0592 n (a R ) r (a S ) s … (a P ) p (a Q ) q … Apply Potential

5 Current is just measure of rate at which species can be brought to electrode surface Two methods: Stirred - hydrodynamic voltammetry Unstirred - polarography (dropping Hg electrode) Three transport mechanisms: (i) migration – movement of ions through solution by electrostatic attraction to charged electrode (ii) convection – mechanical motion of the solution as a result of stirring or flow (iii) diffusion – motion of a species caused by a concentration gradient

6 Voltammetric analysis   Analyte selectivity is provided by the applied potential on the working electrode.   Electroactive species in the sample solution are drawn towards the working electrode where a half-cell redox reaction takes place.  Another corresponding half-cell redox reaction will also take place at the counter electrode to complete the electron flow.  The resultant current flowing through the electrochemical cell reflects the activity (i.e.  concentration) of the electroactive species involved Pb 2+ + 2e - Pb E O = -0.13 V vs. NHE K + + e - K E O = -2.93 V vs. NHE Pt working electrode at -1.0 V vs SCE SCE Ag counter electrode at 0.0 V X M of PbCl 2 0.1M KCl AgCl Ag + Cl -

7 Pb 2+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ -1.0 V vs SCE Pb 2+ + 2e - Pb K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ K+K+ Layers of K + build up around the electrode stop the migration of Pb 2+ via coulombic attraction Concentration gradient created between the surrounding of the electrode and the bulk solution Pb 2+ migrate to the electrode via diffusion

8 C) Types of Voltammetry 1.Polarography −first type of Voltammetry −controlled by diffusion, eliminates convection −uses dropping Hg electrode (DME) as working electrode; current varies as drop grows then falls off

9 a.Advantages of Hg Drop Electrode −High overpotential for reduction of H + Allows use of Hg electrode at lower potentials than indicated from thermodynamic potentials Example: Zn 2+ and Cd 2+ can be reduced in acidic solutions even though E 0 vs NHE = -0.403 (Cd 2+ /Cd) and -0.763 (Zn 2+ /Zn) −new electrode surface is continuously generated Independent of past samples or absorbed impurities −reproducible currents quickly produced 2H + + 2e - H 2 (g)(0V vs NHE)

10 b.Disadvantages of Hg Drop Electrode −Hg oxidation Around +0.25 V vs. SCE Can not be used above a potential of +0.25 V  Hg undergoes anodic dissolution ~ +0.25 V vs. SCE and is oxidized to insoluble Hg 2 C l2 in presence of Cl - at zero V vs. SCE.  It cannot be used for anodic oxidation above +0.25 V vs. SCE. −Non-Faradaic (charging/capacitance) current limits the sensitivity to ~ 10 -5 M residual current is > diffusion current at lower concentrations −cumbersome to use tends to clog, causing malfunction −Hg disposal problems mercury vapors are also very poisonous

11 2.Voltammetry (solid working electrode) Pb 2+ + 2e - Pb E O = -0.13 V vs. NHE K + + e - K E O = -2.93 V vs. NHENote: Reference Electrode: SCE (saturated calomel electrode)Reference Electrode: SCE (saturated calomel electrode) SCE = + 0.24 V vs NHESCE = + 0.24 V vs NHE Thus, the E o of Pb 2+ = -0.37 V vs SCEThus, the E o of Pb 2+ = -0.37 V vs SCE Pt working electrode SCE Ag counter X M of PbCl 2 0.1M KCl AgCl Ag + + Cl -

12 At Electrodes Surface: E appl = E o - log 0.0592 n [M red ] s [M ox ] s at surface of electrode Applied potential If E appl = E o : 0 = log ˆ [M ox ] s = [M red ] s 0.0592 n [M red ] s [M ox ] s M ox + e - » M red If E appl << E o : E appl = E 0 - log  [M red ] s >> [M ox ] s 0.0592 n [M red ] s [M ox ] s

13 Current generated at electrode by this process is proportional to concentration at surface, which in turn is equal to the bulk concentration For a planar electrode: measured current (i) = nFAD A ( ) where: n = number of electrons in ½ cell reaction F = Faraday’s constant A = electrode area (cm 2 ) D = diffusion coefficient (cm 2 /s) of A (oxidant) = slope of curve between C Mox,bulk and C Mox,s  CA xx xx xx

14 As time increases, push banding further and further out. Results in a decrease in current with time until reach point where convection of analyte takes over and diffusion no longer a rate-limiting process.

15 Thickness of Diffusion Layer (  ): i = (c ox, bulk – c ox,s ) - largest slope (highest current) will occur if: E appl << E o (c ox,s. 0) then i = (c ox, bulk – 0) where: k = so: i = kc ox,bulk therefore: current is proportional to bulk concentration - also, as solution is stirred,  decreases and i increases nFAD ox   

16 -0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1.2-1.4 i (  A) Potential applied on the working electrode is usually swept over (i.e. scan) a pre-defined range of applied potential 0.001 M Cd 2+ in 0.1 M KNO 3 supporting electrolyte V vs SCE Working electrode is no yet capable of reducing Cd 2+  only small residual current flow through the electrode Electrode become more and more reducing and capable of reducing Cd 2+ Cd 2+ + 2e - Cd Current starts to be registered at the electrode Current at the working electrode continue to rise as the electrode become more reducing and more Cd 2+ around the electrode are being reduced. Diffusion of Cd 2+ does not limit the current yet All Cd 2+ around the electrode has already been reduced. Current at the electrode becomes limited by the diffusion rate of Cd 2+ from the bulk solution to the electrode. Thus, current stops rising and levels off at a plateau idid E½E½ Base line of residual current

17 Combining Potential and Current Together Half-wave potential : E 1/2 = -0.5  E 0 - E ref E 0 = -0.5 + SCE for M n+ + me - ↔ M (n-m)+ E ½ at ½ i Limiting current Related to concentration

18 Voltammograms for Mixtures of Reactants Two or more species are observed in voltammogram if difference in separate half-wave potentials are sufficient 0.1V 0.2V Different concentrations result in different currents, but same potential [Fe 2+ ]=1x10 -4 M [Fe 2+ ]=0.5x10 -4 M [Fe 3+ ]=0.5x10 -4 M [Fe 3+ ]=1x10 -4 M

19 Amperometric Titrations -Measure equivalence point if analyte or reagent are oxidized or reduced at working electrode - Current is measured at fixed potential as a function of reagent volume endpoint is intersection of both lines Only analyte is reduced Only reagent is reduced Both analyte and reagent are reduced endpoint

20 - Analyte first deposited (reduced) onto the working electrode from a stirred solution -“deposit” analyte for a known period of time - analyte is redissolved or stripped (oxidized) from the electrode - analyte “preconcentrated” onto electrode, thus ASV yields lowest detection limit among all voltammetric techniques 3.Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (ASV)

21 a) Instead of linear change in E appl with time use step changes (pulses in E appl ) with time b) Measure two currents at each cycle - S 1 before pulse & S 2 at end of pulse - plot  i vs. E (  i = E S2 – E S1 ) - peak height ~ concentration - for reversible reaction, peak potential  standard potential for ½ reaction c) differential-pulse voltammetry d) Advantages: - can detect peak maxima differing by as little as 0.04 – 0.05 V < 0.2V peak separation for normal voltammetry - decrease limits of detection by 100-1000x compared to normal voltammetry < 10 -7 to 10 -8 M concentration E0E0 4.Pulse Voltammetry

22 a.Method used to look at mechanisms of redox reactions in solution. b.Looks at i vs. E response of small, stationary electrode in unstirred solution using triangular waveform for excitation Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 1 Segment 2 Cyclic voltammogram (solution phase redox species) 5.Cyclic Voltammetry

23 M ox + ne - M red - in forward scan, as E approaches E 0’, current flow due to M ox + ne - M red - governed by Nernst equation concentrations made to meet Nernst equation at surface - eventually reach i max - solution not stirred, so  grows with time, leads to decrease in i max - in reverse scan - see less current as potential increases until reduction no longer occurs - then reverse reaction takes place (if reaction is reversible) - important parameters - E pc – cathodic peak potential - E pa – anodic peak potential - i pc – cathodic peak current - i pa – anodic peak current i pc ~ i pa (or 1 pc /1 pa ~ 1) Δ E p = (E pa – E pc ) = 0.0592 V / n n = number of electrons involved in the reaction Formal reduction potential E o ’ (E 1/2 ) = = (E pa + E pc ) / 2 Fe 3+ + e - Fe 2+

24 < i pc. i pa   E p = (E pa – E pc ) = 0.0592/n, where n = number of electrons in reaction < E 0 = midpoint of E pa  E pc < i p = 2.686x10 5 n 3/2 AcD 1/2 v 1/2 (Randles-Sevcik eqn) - i p : peak current (A) - n: number of electrons - A: electrode area (cm 2 ) - c: concentration (mol/cm 3 ) - v: scan rate (V/s) - D: diffusion coefficient (cm 2 /s) Important Quantitative Information Thus, - can calculate standard potential for half-reaction - number of electrons involved in half-reaction - diffusion coefficients - if reaction is reversible

25 Cyclic Voltammogram is a good way to determine diffusion coefficient i p = 7.422 x 10 -6 A n = 1 A = 0.0314 cm 2 C = 1 x 10 -6 mol/cm 3 D = diffusion coefficient (cm 2 /s) v = 0.05 V/s D = 1.55 x 10 -5 cm 2 /s Laser Dye (PM 567) Oxidation Reduction Lai and Bard, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107, 5036-5042.


Download ppt "VOLTAMMETRY A.) Comparison of Voltammetry to Other Electrochemical Methods 1.) Voltammetry: electrochemical method in which information about an analyte."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google