1. A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Controls Global Group Tasks John Carwardine Feb 8, 2006

2. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 2 Focus on three areas… Develop a reference design and costing for RDR -The high priority activity of GDE in 2006. Continue to develop the baseline design Pursue key R&D activities -LLRF development at various test stands (TTF, ILCTA, etc) -RF phase / timing distribution -High Availability

3. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 3 Continue to develop the baseline design and BCD

4. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 4 Instrumentation & Control outline in BCD 11.1 Controls Standard Architecture 11.2 Timing System 11.3 Diagnostic Interlock Layer 11.4 Global Network 11.5 Machine Protection 11.6 Low level RF 11.7 Feedback 11.8 Integration with Instrumentation 11.9 Machine Detector Interface 11.10 Instrumentation – Beam position monitors 11.11 Instrumentation – Beam profile monitors (transverse) 11.12 Instrumentation – Longitudinal 11.13 Instrumentation – other (intensity, loss, ring)

5. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 5 Control system architecture in BCD…

6. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 6 Issues arisen from BCD Comments Comments received from Toge, Lockyer, Himel Communicate to technical system and accelerator area leaders the implications of ATCA and Control System High Availability. Change baseline design from VME/VXI to ATCA. Address failure modes for the rf phase reference distribution system (phase jumps). We need more diagrams to communicate what the control system will look like (being done…)

7. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 7 Main tasks still to do (BCD) To be addressed by BCD section authors… -Update other BCD sections in response to comments. -Expand LLRF and feedback sections. -Respond to comments from Himel, Toge, Lockyer (written) -New summary has been written. -Submit case for ATCA instead of VME/VXI. -Submit updated BCD to CCB before Bangalore. To be addressed by the Controls Topic Groups… -Understand requirements from accelerator areas. -Continue to develop control system design details. -Apportion the RF performance requirements across the subsystems.

8. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 8 Controls Topic Groups CONTROLS INTEGRATION (overall integration) -Carwardine (ANL), Simrock (DESY), Michizono (KEK), Mcbride (FNAL) CONTROL SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE -Saunders (ANL), Clausen (DESY), Rehlich (DESY), Votava (FNAL) Rechenmacher, Pavlicek (FNAL), Furukawa (KEK) DATA ACQUISITION / CONTROL -Wendt (FNAL), Votava (FNAL) HIGH AVAILABILITY -Larsen (SLAC), Downing (SLAC), Lenkszus (ANL), Saunders (ANL). CONTROLS / INSTRUMENTATION INTEGRATION -Wendt (FNAL)

9. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 9 Controls Topic Groups (2) LLRF -Nageitsev (FNAL), Cancelo (FNAL), Carcagno (FNAL), Chase (FNAL), Simrock (DESY), Michizono (KEK), Lockyer (U.Penn) TIMING AND RF PHASE REFERENCE DISTRIBUTION -Lenkszus (ANL), Frisch (SLAC), Pavlicek (FNAL), Matsumoto (KEK) MACHINE PROTECTION SYSTEM -Ross (SLAC), Lenkszus (ANL) BEAM-BASED FEEDBACK -Burrows (U. Oxford), Carwardine (ANL), Lebrun (FNAL), White (U. Oxford)

10. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 10 Instrumentation Topic Groups BEAM POSITION MONITORS: -Smith (SLAC), Wendt (FNAL), Baboi (DESY) BEAM PROFILE MONITORS - LASERWIRE: -Blair (RHUL), Urakawa (KEK) BEAM INTENSITY MONITORS, BEAM LOSS MONITORS: -TBA BUNCH LENGTH MONITORS: -Ross (SLAC) SPECIAL INSTRUMENTATION: -Ross (SLAC), KEK physicist

11. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 11 Pursue key R&D activities

12. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 12 LLRF development FNAL, DESY, KEK already actively pursuing this with regard to test stands (ILCTA, TTF, ATF-2, etc) [Feb 9-10 th workshop] Should determine how we can best integrate the test stands into other controls related development activities.

13. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 13 Timing / RF phase reference distribution Various issues discussed at Jan 19-20 meeting, including… Evaluate and demonstrate various options -Trench test of fiber system (vs coil in oven) -Sector test – the copper part (local distribution). -Two-channel receiver comparator scheme -Low-cost way of building a vcxo with sufficient performance? -“To chop or not to chop” Different schemes to meet the bunch compressor requirements. Failure modes and effects analysis. Pursue HOM phase detector scheme.

14. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 14 Feedback development issues Various issues discussed at Jan 19-20 meeting, including… How do the beam-based feedback systems deal with exceptions? -Startup, beam loss, MPS trip, etc -Detecting and handing bad sensors or actuators. Integrated simulation of LLRF and beam-based feedback. Interplay between the various feedbacks and feed-forwards? How does beam-based feedback help the rf specs? How many intra-train feedbacks do we have, and how many pulses do they collectively take to converge? Should beam trajectory feedback be several individual loops or a single global system?

15. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 15 High Availability control system demo R&D Roadmap (starting point) -Claude’s proposal - ATCA + EPICS iocCore + shelf manager + ICE middleware - Claude to set up discussion with interested parties. - Develop an AMC module to plug in / integrate with Claude’s ATCA crate. -How do we utilize the test stands (ILCTA, ATF, TTF)? Feb 9/10 Fermilab mtg

16. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 16 Develop a reference design and costing for RDR

17. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 17 RDR Design Matrix

18. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 18 “Charges for RDR Leaders” memo of 1/12/06 [see Ray Larsen’s table]

19. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 19 Guidance for costing exercise High level guidance -Expected margin of error for control system costing is +/-30%. -Focus first on overall ILC cost drivers first. -DCB looking for resolution of a few x 0.1% (~$50M). -Priority should be on a top-down rather than bottom-up costing. -Use what has already been done for NLC, TTR, USLCTOS, etc -The RDR is not a detailed design document. -Need to include ‘everything’ We need to know what to cost and how many…

20. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 20 Baseline is a High Availability control system… Front-end hardware -Switch from VME to ATCA in baseline for RDR. -Need to know what needs hardware redundancy at front-end. Servers etc -Need to budget for HA relational databases, software, central computing, data archivers, etc -Central computing + archiving + data backups, etc is part of controls domain. MIS computing is not. Control system -We will provide infrastructure for implementing HA functionality. -We have to make the middleware reliable (especially). -Cost will be in implementing the recovery policies. -To what level do we go with HA software in the various layers?

21. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 21 Main tasks to do (RDR and costing) Develop WBS structure for Controls and LLRF. Collect baseline info from accelerator areas. Develop Control System and LLRF block diagrams. Generate Excel spreadsheet of line items for costing exercise. Meet RDR deliverables, as listed in the “Charge to RDR Leaders” memo. Prepare for LLRF and Controls reviews in April/May. Issue: an apparent lack of availability of people to work on RDR.

22. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 22 Immediate tasks Continue to develop the integrated control system diagram. Develop an RF/LLRF block diagram of each accelerator area (linac is the most important to do first) -How many I/O + DAQ channels. -How many relay racks. -Cable plant. Develop a controls block diagram for each accelerator area -How many I/O + DAQ channels. -How many relay racks. -Show interfaces to LLRF, Instrumentation, Timing, MPS, etc -Cable plant.

23. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 23 Control System WBS outline Global Control System - - -RF System - We need information from the area and technical leaders to complete the Controls WBS for the accelerator areas.

24. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 24 Control System WBS (Global level) Global level (starting point) -Central computing -Networking infrastructure -Timing system / RF phase reference. -Central MPS -Personnel Protection System -Control Room(s) -Data archiving -Control System Software development -Installation / commissioning Aim to develop a structure with nodes that can be costed and that can be cloned as needed.

25. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 25 Requirements gathering exercise Plan: -Appoint two points of contact (POC) for each of the six accelerator areas: one for LLRF; one for the Control System. -Appoint one POC for each of the five global groups. Goals: -Get a broad-brush understanding of the scope of the control system requirements to be able to cost the control system. -Create building-blocks for the RDR costing exercise. -Help establish treaty points. Initial deliverables from each Point of Contact -Block diagram showing functions and basic geographic layout. -Estimate of number of I/O channels and data rates.

26. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 26 Proposal for accelerator area POCs E- sourceE+ sourceDamping Ring RTMLLinacBDS LLRF Controls

27. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 27 Integrated control system block diagrams We should develop a hierarchy of block diagrams for the integrated control system -Integrated control system functional diagram (Ned’s diagram) -Block diagram of each global subsystem - Timing, MPS, archiving, central control system, etc, etc -Block diagram of each accelerator area control system - E-, E+, DR, RTML, Linac, BDS -Block diagram of each accelerator area LLRF system - E-, E+, DR, RTML, Linac, BDS -Beam-based feedback. -Hardware/geographic and software centric views. Each block becomes a node on the WBS.

28. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 28 ICS Functional Diagram “Ned’s Diagram” (2/1/06 revision)

29. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 29 ICS Functional Diagram (detail)

30. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 30 Cryo section block diagram

31. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 31 Summary: RDR action items Identify Points of Contact for accelerators and global groups POCs develop LLRF and controls block diagrams for each accelerator area. Develop the controls story for Bangalore. Develop a costable WBS for Controls and LLRF. Define costing procedures. Prepare for first review in April/May timeframe.

32. Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 32 We need a pitch for Bangalore… Strategy for completing the RDR task -Management, technical, etc How we see things coming together. What we need from the area, technical, and global groups. R&D issues for controls and LLRF.