Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Controlling Liverworts R Kasten Dumroese, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station Kent Eggleston, USDA Forest Service, Coeur d’Alene Nursery Anthony.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Controlling Liverworts R Kasten Dumroese, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station Kent Eggleston, USDA Forest Service, Coeur d’Alene Nursery Anthony."— Presentation transcript:

1 Controlling Liverworts R Kasten Dumroese, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station Kent Eggleston, USDA Forest Service, Coeur d’Alene Nursery Anthony S Davis, UI Center for Forest Nursery and Seedling Research David Barcel, Chemtura Crop Protection

2 Background Demand for whitebark pine seedlings for reforestation is high Difficult to obtain large quantities of seeds Difficult to germinate seeds Slow growing species requires two full growing seasons to reach target specs Important to maximize seed-to-seedling ratios Liverworts invade during second growing season; reduce seedling survival and growth unless removed – hand weeding only effective treatment Hand weeding increases costs about 17%

3 Second season whitebark pine seedlings are very susceptible to liverwort and moss competition

4 Keeping second season whitebark pine seedlings clean maximizes growth needed for stock quality prior to shipping.

5 Methods Two Montana seed sources:  Gardiner District on the Gallatin NF  Glacier National Park SuperCells-98/tray-10cu.in. Second growing season Liverwort intensities qualitatively assessed  Low = removed by hand 1 mo before (Glacier)  Medium = removed by hand 2 mo before (Glacier)  High = rampant, never removed (Gardiner)

6 Initial Liverwort Intensities Qualitative assessment  Low = liverwort removed 1 mo earlier; starting to re-invade  Medium = liverwort removed 2 mo earlier  High = rampant liverwort; never removed Liverwort at high intensity was about 3 cm (1.25 in) thick

7 LowMedium High

8

9

10 Method-Treatments Treatment 1. Gentry (a fine powder; 26% 2-amino-3-chloro-1,4- naphthoquinone) mixed at a rate of 0.14 g in 100 ml of water and applied with a hand sprayer evenly across the block. Equivalent to manufacturers lowest suggested label rate (1 oz per gallon of water applied at 1 quart per 100 sq ft). Treatment 2. 0.28 g Gentry / 100 ml Treatment 3. 0.42 g Gentry / 100 ml Treatment 4. 0.56 g Gentry / 100 ml. Equivalent to manufacturer’s highest suggested label rate (2 oz per gallon of water applied at 2 quarts per 100 sq ft). Treatment 5. TerraCyte, a fine powder (34% sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate), applied at the label rate of 15 lb per 1000 sq ft (13.6 g per block of seedlings) after wetting the crop to improve adherence of the chemical to plant tissue. We used a series of #30 and #40 standard soil sieves to ensure even distribution of the chemical across the block (well, sorta). Treatment 6. Control. Application of 100 ml plain water with the hand sprayer.

11 Methods-Applications Each tray of SuperCells (98 plants) was a replicate 3 replicates Each batch of chemical made and applied independently to avoid pseudo-replication Applied 29 March 2007 Efficacy measured 12 April 2007

12

13 Liverwort Mortality Qualitative assessment  At low and medium liverwort intensities, all rates of Gentry were effective  At high liverwort intensities, only two highest rates of Gentry were effective TerraCyte was effective with low intensities of liverwort; less effective at the medium and high intensities—may be a function of application technique rather than efficacy.

14

15

16 Hand weeded 2 mo earlierControl – high intensity Hand weeded 1 mo earlierGentry (0.42 g)

17 Phytotoxicity No phytotoxicity observed with Gentry  Also applied operationally to Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine in the same greenhouse Phytotoxicity observed with TerraCyte  Poor distribution of powder across tray  Poor distribution caused necrotic tissue; in worst cases, seedling mortality  For operational use, would need a better application method

18 Summary – Management Implications Use when liverworts are just becoming established—lowest rates work fine If liverwort intensity is “high” then higher rates are necessary— follow-up application a few days later will probably be needed to kill remaining liverworts No observed phytotoxicity on actively growing whitebark pine, ponderosa pine, or Douglas-fir (Kas also had good success with spot applications under wild ginger). (Kent had good success on willow, kinnikinnik, western larch) Gentry submitted by Chemtura for registration with US Environmental Protection Agency—decision expected by January 2008.

19 Out-takes


Download ppt "Controlling Liverworts R Kasten Dumroese, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station Kent Eggleston, USDA Forest Service, Coeur d’Alene Nursery Anthony."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google