1. 1 Household Budget Survey 2006-07 Presentation of preliminary results National Bureau of Statistics Oxford Policy Management University of Nottingham

2. 2 Outline of presentation Overview of survey Social sector indicators Housing, household amenities and assets Household productive activities and banking  Discussion Consumption and consumption poverty  Discussion Conclusions and next steps  Discussion

3. 3 Sample Sample drawn from 2002 census EAs, with new HH listing undertaken Stratified households within EAs based on socio- economic information Listing figures often quite different from census figures and overall lower Weights take into account these factors 10,466 of intended 10,752 HHs analysed (97%) Around 12% replacements

4. 4 Sample breakdown No HHs analysed Wted pop, mlln % Weight % Weight for 2000/01 HBS Dar es Salaam3,4563.098.15.8 Other urban areas3,7376.7817.713.8 Rural areas3,27328.4274.280.4 Total10,46638.29100.0

5. 5 Data quality Around 10,000 HHs, smaller than last time but still fairly large NBS recent experience, some more supervision but probably still too few supervisors Change in diary item codes complicated analysis Data entry was quick, but should have been better controlled (eg HHID) Hard to judge, but data quality probably similar to last time Worth identifying lessons for next time

6. 6 Social sector indicators: - demographic, health, education

7. 7 Demographics Small decline on reported average household size (4.9 to 4.8 -to check) Continued rise in female-headed households Small increase in proportion of total population and HH heads over 65

8. 8 Female-headed households

9. 9 Health Compared with 2000/01: Similar proportions reporting illness in the last four weeks, and similar patterns by area (rural>other urban>Dar) No change in proportions consulting any provider when sick (69%), but Increase in consultation at government facilities (55% to 65%) Small increase in proportion satisfied with services in govt facilities, fewer reporting lack of drugs

10. 10 Consultation with govt providers

11. 11 Education Compared with 2000/01: Little change in overall adult literacy levels (but examine younger age groups) Large increase in enrolment rates, both primary and secondary (- though sec still low) Improvements in class attended for age of child (eg 30% of 9 year olds in school in St III, cf 13%)

12. 12 Net enrolment ratios - primary, lower secondary

13. 13 Housing, amenities and assets

14. 14 Housing and household amenities Substantial improvements in use of ‘permanent’ housing materials - in all areas (Dar/OU/rural) No change in proportion without a toilet (7%)* Drinking water: apparent decline in piped water; partly classification changes?

15. 15 House construction materials (%)

16. 16 Drinking water supply (%)

17. 17 Ownership of selected consumer assets DarOther UrbRuralMainland Tanzania 2000/0120072000/0120072000/0120072000/012007 Radio / r. cassette 79.680.071.573.345.762.251.966.2 Telephone - any 9.8 63.7 2.9 43.3 0.2 14.3 1.2 25.0 LandlineNA 2.8 NA 1.9 NA 0.6 NA 1.1 CellphoneNA 62.8 NA 42.5 NA 13.9 NA 24.5 Television20.137.77.015.80.21.82.68.2 Beds95.295.893.993.483.789.586.090.0 Computer * 1.43.21.50.51.40.11.40.5 Mosquito nets 79.692.066.384.127.961.337.168.9 Motor vehicle 5.94.42.2 0.70.31.31.1 Motor cycle1.41.11.82.90.71.20.91.5 Bicycle11.615.534.335.938.445.436.040.5

18. 18 Households’ cooking energy

19. 19 Electricity

20. 20 Household productive activities and banking

21. 21 Household productive activities Main activity of adults: - decline in farming - rise employment and self-employment - issue of comparability of questions (to check)

22. 22 Household banking and finance Since 2000/01, modest increases in households with at least one member: - having a bank account, (but large drop 91-01) - taking a bank loan, - participating in informal (and formal) savings groups Overall levels still low and more concentrated in urban areas

23. 23 Household banking and saving (% HHs with at least one member with…)

24. 24 Consumption and Consumption Poverty

25. 25 Consumption Aggregate Two consumption aggregates were calculated: -a complete aggregate and -a more refined aggregate for the poverty estimates Complete aggregate includes: food, durables, non durables, medical, education, telecommunications Poverty aggregate includes food, and some durables and non durables: linen, hh equipment, clothes, personal effects, personal care, recreation, cleaning products, domestic services, contributions, fuel, petrol, soap and cigarettes

26. 26 Expenditure per capitaDar es Salaam Other urban areasRural areasTotal 20002007200020072000200720002007 Food purchased10,30118,6807,11412,6503,1185,9444,0858,145 Food not purchased3685268761,7172,3754,6122,0513,775 Food total10,66819,2067,98914,3675,49210,5566,13711,919 Durables1,8922,6301,0992,0904847676501,149 Medical569793338490190286232363 Education9742,2624311,059138248227552 Other non-Durables7,00613,5674,2538,2172,1464,3682,7185,782 Telecommunications3042,82174877619433524 Total pc21,18341,27914,13127,1008,45216,4189,97220,288 Not adjusted for prices

27. 27 Total adjusted for prices using Fisher of 1.93 Dar es SalaamOther urbanRuralTotal 2000 21,18314,1318,4529,972 2007 21,38814,0418,50710,512

28. 28 Shares per capitaDar es SalaamOther urbanRuralTotal 20002007200020072000200720002007 Food purchased pc53.151.653.449.435.533.339.037.6 Food not purchased pc2.11.88.09.432.133.227.026.5 Durables pc5.24.65.35.54.53.94.74.2 Other non-Durables pc31.630.927.528.624.125.825.026.7 Medical pc2.92.12.41.92.11.82.21.8 Education pc4.13.73.12.91.71.42.01.8 Telecommunications pc0.95.40.32.10.00.60.11.3 Of which, total food55.253.361.458.967.566.566.064.1

29. 29 Food Prices Not straight forward given the change in item codes - matched as many item codes as possible - excluded items that could not be measured in a standard unit - or had too few observations Left with100 food items Laspeyres: 1.96 National Food CPI: 1.52

30. 30 Non Food Prices Began with the national CPI basket matched item codes with the 2000/01 and 2007 surveys dropped items with no quantity information and dropped items with less than 10 observations Left with 67 items Laspeyres: 2.01 National Non Food CPI: 1.29

31. 31 Non Food Prices Constructed new basket using frequency of purchases from HBS took items in 2007 with more than 100 records matched item codes with the 2000/01 survey dropped items with no quantity information Left with 41 items New basket: 2.37 Results driven by large increase in prices on fuels and their increased share of expenditure, in particular firewood Without firewood: 2.01

32. 32 Combining Weighted average of food and non food used as price deflator Combined according to the share of food and non food expenditure for the bottom 25% of the sample: 0.72 and 0.28 respectively Laspeyres1.98 (national CPI 1.42) Fisher1.93

33. 33 Poverty Line 2000/01 poverty line inflated using Fisher index 2000/012007 Food 5,29510,219 Basic Needs7,25313,998

34. 34 Incidence of poverty - headcount YearDarUrbanRuralTotal Food199113.615.023.121.6 20017.513.220.418.7 20076.712.918.416.5 Basic199128.128.740.838.6 200117.625.838.735.7 200716.224.137.433.3

35. 35 Inequality Year DarUrbanRuralTotal 19910.300.350.330.34 2000/010.36 0.330.35 20070.340.350.330.35

36. 36 % Share of expenditure for poverty aggregate Quintiles2000/012007 Q1 – poorest6.86.7 Q211.211.5 Q315.616.1 Q422.222.5 Q5 – richest44.243.2 Ratio Q5-Q16.5

37. 37 % Share of expenditure for total consumption aggregate Quintiles2000/012007 Q1 – poorest6.45.3 Q210.810.0 Q315.214.8 Q421.721.9 Q5 – richest45.947.9 Ratio Q5-Q17.29.0

38. 38 Results highly sensitive to price index Analysis has been based on a comparable estimate In the future thought should be given to possible changes to the consumption aggregate and basket

39. 39 Preliminary conclusions - I Substantial improvements in schooling, no change in curative health services use but apparent shift to using more govt services Worsening of water supplies and no improvement in sanitation Improvements in housing materials and increase in the ownership of many consumer goods

40. 40 Preliminary conclusions - II Continuing shift from farming to other activities Very modest increase in real consumption levels Very modest decline in consumption poverty (may well not be stat. significant) However, sensitivity of poverty estimates to price index and consumption aggregate (and contrast with assets) No changes in inequality on ‘poverty’ consumption aggregate: but increases with overall consumption aggregate