1. 7. Gamma-ray strength functions Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning 1,2 1 Division of Applied Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 2 Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group (NRG), Petten, The Netherlands Email: koning@nrg.eu PhD course on Nuclear reactions and nuclear reaction modeling with TALYS, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, November 13 – 20, 2014

2. THE COMPOUND NUCLEUS MODEL (basic formalism) Compound nucleus hypothesis - Continuum of excited levels - Independence between incoming channel a and outgoing channel b abababab=  (CN) P b aaaa  (CN) = T a aaaa p kakakaka 2 Pb=Pb=Pb=Pb= TbTbTbTb S TcS TcS TcS Tc c  Hauser- Feshbach formula = abababab p kakakaka 2 Ta TbTa TbTa TbTa Tb S TcS TcS TcS Tc c Tb can only be a gamma-ray transmission coefficient

3. Gamma transmission coefficients T k (   ) = = 2  f(k,  ))   2 +1 k : transition type EM (E or M) : transition multipolarity   : outgoing gamma energy f(k,  ) : gamma strength function Decay selection rules from a level J i  i to a level J f  f : For E : For M : |J i - ≤ J f ≤ J i +  f =(-1)  i  f =(-1)  i (several models) 2  k  (   )  (E) dE  E E+  E Renormalisation technique for thermal neutrons = 2   (B n ) D0D0 1 experiment C  T k (  )  (B n - ,J f,  f ) S(,J i,  i  J i,  f ) d  =  0 BnBn Ji,iJi,i k Jf,fJf,f C

4. MISCELLANEOUS : THE PHOTON EMISSION (strength function and selection rules)

5. THE PHOTON EMISSION (strength function and selection rules) Improved analytical expressions : - 2 Lorentzians for deformed nuclei - Account for low energy deviations from standard Lorentzians for E1. Kadmenskij-Markushef-Furman model (1983)  Enhanced Generalized Lorentzian model of Kopecky-Uhl (1990)  Hybrid model of Goriely (1998)  Generalized Fermi liquid model of Plujko-Kavatsyuk (2003) - Reconciliation with electromagnetic nuclear response theory  Modified Lorentzian model of Plujko et al. (2002)  Simplified Modified Lorentzian model of Plujko et al. (2008) Microscopic approaches : RPA, QRPA « Those who know what is (Q)RPA don’t care about details, those who don’t know don’t care either », private communication  Systematic QRPA with Skm force for 3317 nuclei performed by Goriely-Khan (2002,2004)  Systematic QRPA with Gogny force underconstruction

6. MISCELLANEOUS : THE PHOTON EMISSION (phenomenology vs microscopic) See S. Goriely & E. Khan, NPA 706 (2002) 217. S. Goriely et al., NPA739 (2004) 331.

7. Important for practical TALYS work (TALYS manual) 7 Strength function can be renormalised and fitted to neutron capture data Using gamgamadjust keyword

8. Fit capture cross section for Cu-65 Channels y Filechannels y Plot (log scale) xs000000.tot Adjust ‘gamgamadjust 29 66’ until satisfied 8

9. Photonuclear: Do this for Cu-65 (any exp data? If not, run for Cu-63) 9