Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

5-4 Inverses, Contrapositives, and Indirect Reasoning

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "5-4 Inverses, Contrapositives, and Indirect Reasoning"— Presentation transcript:

1 5-4 Inverses, Contrapositives, and Indirect Reasoning
Objectives Write the negation of a statement Write the inverse and contrapositive of a statement Use indirect reasoning

2 p. 280 Ex 1: Writing the Negation of a Statement
The negation of a statement has the opposite truth value Statement: ∠ ABC is obtuse. Negation: ∠ ABC is not obtuse. Write the negation of the following statement: Today is not Tuesday. Today is Tuesday.

3 p. 281 Ex 2: Writing the Inverse and Contrapositive
Conditional: If a figure is a square, then it is a rectangle. Inverse: Negates both the hypothesis and conclusion of a conditional If a figure is not a square, then it is not a rectangle. Contrapositive: Switches the hypothesis and conclusion of a conditional and negates both If a figure is not a rectangle, then it is not a square.

4 Summary Statement Symbol In words Equivalent to Conditional p  q
(always have same truth value) Conditional p  q If p, then q. Contrapositive Converse q  p If q, then p. Inverse Negation (of p) ~p Not p. ~p  ~q If not p, then not q. Contra-positive ~q  ~p If not q, then not p.

5 Using Indirect Reasoning
In indirect reasoning, all possibilities are considered and then all but one are proved false. The remaining possibility must be true. A proof involving indirect reasoning is an indirect proof.

6 Writing an Indirect Proof
State as an assumption the opposite of what you want to prove. Show that this assumption leads to a contradiction. Conclude that the assumption must be false and that what you want to prove must be true.

7 p. 282 Ex 3a The First Step of an Indirect Proof
Prove that quadrilateral QRWX does not have four acute angles. First Step: State as an assumption the opposite of what you want to prove. Assume that quadrilateral QRWX has four acute angles.

8 p. 282 Ex. 5 Writing an Indirect Proof
Given fact: The total cost of two items is more than $50. Prove: At least one of the items costs more than $25. Proof: Step 1. Assume the opposite of what you want to prove. Assume that each item costs $25 or less. Step 2. Show that this assumption leads to a contradiction. So the total cost of the two items is $50 or less. This contradicts the given fact that the total cost of two items is more than $50. Step 3. Conclude that the assumption must be false and that what you want to prove is true. Therefore, the assumption that each item costs $25 or less is false. Therefore, at least one item costs $25 or more.


Download ppt "5-4 Inverses, Contrapositives, and Indirect Reasoning"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google