Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlison Wright Modified over 9 years ago
1
Picosecond Heat Transport through Molecular Layers Zhaohui Wang, Nak-Hyun Seong, Alexei S. Lagoutchev, Dana D. Dlott School of Chemical Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
2
Heat conduction through monolayer S (CH 2 ) n CH 3 h Ultrafast thermal conductance Heat flow along chain Alkanethiols: SH-(CH 2 ) n -CH 3 on Au surface Heat conduction through interface Heat Pulse To follow this process, we need: (1) Ultrafast T jump (2) Ultrafast time resolution (3) High spatial resolution
3
Au Glass SFG signal IR 3400 nm120 fs Visible 800 nm 1 ps Heat Pulse 800 nm 0.5 ps Alkanethiols HS-(CH2-………-CH2)-CH3 25002700290031003300 wavenumber (cm -1 ) s CH3 a CH3 2 CH3 Picosecond Heat Transport through Molecular Layers Cr 0.8 nm 50 nm 2 mm
4
Ultrafast thermal reflectance measurements -505101520 delay time (ps) temperature (arb) 80% 99% artifact Ultrafast subtrate heat up: ps T jump
5
2850290029503000 wavenumber (cm -1 ) with heat pulse long time a CH 3 s CH 3 a CH 2 s CH 2 CH 3 no heat pulse S (CH 2 ) n CH 3 h SFG spectra of SAM with n = 17 (C18) Optical thermometer approximately one atom thick
6
SFG spectra: C8 vs. C18 20 ps 10 ps 5 ps -2 ps wavenumber (cm -1 ) SFG intensity 2850290029503000 C8 -2 ps 5 ps 10 ps 20 ps 2850290029503000 C18 wavenumber (cm -1 )
7
Data analysis Vibrational Response Function VRF = [I(T cold )-I(t)]/I(T cold )-I(T hot ) I(T cold ) is the SFG intensity at ambient T I(T hot ) is the SFG intensity at long delay time 2850290029503000 wavenumber (cm -1 ) I(T cold ) I(T hot )
8
Vibrational response function C8 Vs. C18 020406080 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 C8 C18 Vibrational response function time (ps) (1) Coherent artifact at t = 0 (2) Delayed build up: t 0 (3) Exponential rise time constant:
9
Vibrational response function for C8 (n=7) ln(1-VRF) time (ps) VRF t0t0
10
Vibrational response function for C18 (n=17) ln(1-VRF) time (ps) VRF t0t0
11
VRF for C8 (n=7), C12 (n=11), and C18 (n=17) time (ps) ln(1-VRF)
12
dependence on chain length of the delay time (t 0 ) chain length (nm) delay (ps) 1.01.52.02.53.03.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 y = -0.9 + 1.005 * x delay Linear Fit h(nm) = 0.127n + 0.4, ( J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111, 321 *1989) t 0 is the time for the leading edge of the heat burst launched from hot Au surface to arrive at the terminal CH 3
13
dependence on chain length of time constant (1)Molecular simulation of a C16 SAM shows that orientational disorder can be created in 2 ps with infinitely fast heating (2)heat transfer dominated by interface thermal conductancey
14
Summary: An ultrafast thermal conductance apparatus with an optical thermometer approximately one atom thick was used to study heat conduction through SAM on gold substrate The linear dependence of t 0 on chain length indicates that the heat burst propagates ballistically along the chain with a speed of ~1 km/s Interface thermal conductance G = hC p / G = 720(±100) MWm -2 K -1 corresponds to molecular conductance per chain of 1.6 x 10 -10 W K -1 = 1 eV ns -1 K -1
15
Acknowledges: Jeffrey A. Carter Yee Kan Koh David G. Cahill (MRL, UIUC) Sponsor: DOE, NSF, AFOSR
16
Vibrational response decay curves Peak amplitude ratio vs. delay time
17
Decay of C18 with different heating power 0306090 0.5 1.0 Intensity (heated/noheat) time (ps) 120 J 90 J 25002700290031003300 wavenumber (cm -1 )
18
Decay of C18 with different heating power 110100 0.0 0.5 1.0 Vibrational response function time (ps) Normalized to unit
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.