Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

 Group 1 – Cochise, Pima, Santa Cruz, Greenlee, Graham  Group 2 – Coconino, Apache, Navajo County & Nation & Hopi Tribes  Group 3 – Mohave, Yavapai.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: " Group 1 – Cochise, Pima, Santa Cruz, Greenlee, Graham  Group 2 – Coconino, Apache, Navajo County & Nation & Hopi Tribes  Group 3 – Mohave, Yavapai."— Presentation transcript:

1  Group 1 – Cochise, Pima, Santa Cruz, Greenlee, Graham  Group 2 – Coconino, Apache, Navajo County & Nation & Hopi Tribes  Group 3 – Mohave, Yavapai  Group 4 – Yuma, La Paz  Group 5 – Gila, Pinal  Group 6 – Glendale, Peoria, El Mirage, Surprise  Group 7 – Avondale, Goodyear, Litchfield Park, Buckeye, Wickenburg, Laveen, Tolleson  Group 8 – Tempe, Scottsdale, Guadalupe  Group 9 – Mesa, Gilbert, Chandler, Queen Creek, Apache Junction, Higley  Group 10 – Phoenix

2  The demographics of every community is different. Let’s create a common understanding of the populations you serve. ◦ Introduce yourself and your organization’s primary focus. ◦ What specific needs will your constituency have in an emergency/disaster? ◦ What resources do you need most in a disaster? ◦ What resources does your organization have to offer?

3  Taking your group’s demographics into consideration, what does an inclusive & collaborative relationship look like? ◦ Who is involved, what resources are needed, what format or forum does it need to take place in? ◦ Is it part of a government, a coalition of service providers, or outside of the government completely. ◦ Who should lead these efforts?

4  What are the biggest challenges to inclusive & collaborative relationships? ◦ What roadblocks do you see in the development of these committees and collaboration relationships and how do alleviate and mitigate it? ◦ Having identified needs and resources to meet those needs, what additional resources are needed to fill the gaps in the needs that haven’t been fulfilled. ◦ How do you maximize available resources to meet current and unaddressed needs

5  What do you think is a feasible way forward? How can you carry the conversations and relationships gained at this conference back to your community? ◦ Who is identified to be responsible for organizing a recurring conversation, is someone willing to take ownership of this issue? ◦ Who is not at the “planning table” today that should be included and who will be responsible for reaching out to those individuals? ◦ Is this an organized, formal structure?

6  What did you like about this conference?  What did you not like about this conference?  Should we do it again? ◦ If so, prioritize the top three issues that you feel we should focus on?


Download ppt " Group 1 – Cochise, Pima, Santa Cruz, Greenlee, Graham  Group 2 – Coconino, Apache, Navajo County & Nation & Hopi Tribes  Group 3 – Mohave, Yavapai."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google