Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

© Crown copyright Met Office High resolution COPE simulations Kirsty Hanley, Humphrey Lean UK.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "© Crown copyright Met Office High resolution COPE simulations Kirsty Hanley, Humphrey Lean UK."— Presentation transcript:

1 © Crown copyright Met Office High resolution COPE simulations Kirsty Hanley, Humphrey Lean MetOffice@Reading, UK

2 © Crown copyright Met Office COPE Field campaign to study the production of precipitation in organised convective systems over SW England during July and August 2013

3 © Crown copyright Met Office Aims of COPE Understand the physical processes involved in convective precipitation. Improve the representation of microphysical processes in operational km-scale NWP. Improve the exploitation of data used for operational assimilation. Leading to improved forecast of convective precipitation that can cause flash flooding.

4 © Crown copyright Met Office COPE IOPs Sea breeze

5 © Crown copyright Met Office UKV – 1.5km grid length, 70 levels, 2D subgrid turbulence scheme, BL mixing in vertical. 500m model – 500x400 km 200m model – 300x200 km 100m model – 150x100 km High res models: 140 vertical levels, 3D subgrid turbulence scheme, RH crit is 0.97 (0.91) in 1 st few layers decreasing smoothly to 0.9 (0.8) at ~3.5km. Set of nested models. Model setup – UM vn8.2 PS32

6 © Crown copyright Met Office 18 July – popcorn convection up to 9km

7 © Crown copyright Met Office 25 July – line of showers up to 3km

8 © Crown copyright Met Office 29 July – organised convective line over SW peninsula

9 © Crown copyright Met Office 3 August – convergence line

10 © Crown copyright Met Office Summary 1 Saw quite high rainrates from warm rain. Cells appear to get smaller as grid length is reduced – this agrees with work done for DYMECS. The high resolution models maybe produce too much rain. Lines appear to break up in 200m and 100m model – why? Are the cells getting smaller a result of the updrafts getting narrower or is it a micophysics issue?  Look at a sea breeze case without precipitation to isolate vertical velocity.

11 © Crown copyright Met Office July 5 – sea breeze convergence

12 © Crown copyright Met Office July 5 – sea breeze convergence

13 © Crown copyright Met Office July 5 – sea breeze convergence FAAM obs Different colours are different times

14 © Crown copyright Met Office July 5 – sea breeze convergence Vertical velocity at 325m 13Z UKV 500m 100m200m Different scale!

15 © Crown copyright Met Office July 5 – sea breeze convergence Vertical velocity at 13Z UKV 500m 100m 200m 1.5 6 6 6-2 -0.5 0 0 0 0 4 1 4 4 2 0.5 2 2 0 0 0 0 1000

16 © Crown copyright Met Office Westerly wind at 13Z UKV 500m 100m 200m 5 5 5-5 0 0 0 0 5 July 5 – sea breeze convergence 1000 0 0 0 0

17 © Crown copyright Met Office July 5 – sea breeze convergence

18 © Crown copyright Met Office Summary 2 and Future Work Updraft magnitude and width compares reasonably well between the observations and the high resolution models – how does cloud width compare? Compare simulations with lidar and King Air measurements. Identify key areas of difference between models and observations: Timing, location, size and intensity of cells.


Download ppt "© Crown copyright Met Office High resolution COPE simulations Kirsty Hanley, Humphrey Lean UK."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google