1. April Harding Bali Hyatt Hotel, Sanur, Bali 21-25 June 2010

2. 2 To understand why it is so difficult to successfully engage the private health sector To introduce a framework for thinking strategically about private health sector policy To provide a quick introduction to the major policy instruments for engaging the private sector

3. 3 To understand why it is so difficult to successfully engage the private health sector To introduce a framework for thinking strategically about private health sector policy To provide a quick introduction to the major policy instruments for engaging the private sector

4. 4 Why talk about & study private health sector policy? Course Framework Challenges Being strategic

5. Large role of private sector People Use the Private Sector for Services (India ‘95-96)

6. 6 Analytics are different, because….. Behavior and incentives are different Instruments/ policies to influence are different Why else? Because it is so often overlooked

7. 7 Respondents identified key barriers to engagement with the private sector as (in descending order): lack of knowledge and/or capacity in the public sector to do it resistance or lack of support by MOH staff and/or their unions lack of funding and/or funding mechanisms absence of a policy framework for collaboration/engagement resistance or lack of support at political level resistance or lack of support by donors/technical agencies

8. 8 For achieving priority objectives…..even for the poor With respect to child health, TB, malaria….

9. Large role….and unlikely to diminish Responsiveness: Private Sector Outperforms Public Sector Andhra Pradesh (2000)

10. 10 Private sector is there Contract with NGOs

11. 11 Private sector is bad Write more regulations

12. 12 When it makes sense Using proven instruments Based on private sector understanding Knowing how private sector response will contribute to sector goals

13. Framework Defining Sectoral Issues Outcomes Distribution/ Equity Efficiency Quality of Care Public Sector Private Sector Source: Harding & Preker, Private Participation in Health Services, 2003. PHSA Gather available informatio n Identify add. needs In-depth studies Activities Hospitals PHC Diagnostic labs Producers/ istributors Ownership For-profit corporate For-profit small business Non-profit charitable Formal/ Informal Strategies Harness Grow Convert Policy Tools Regulation Contracting Training/Info Social marketing Social franch. Info. to patients Demand-side (incl. Vouchers) PPP transactions Enabling environment improvement

14. 14 Shifting from funding to purchasing (e.g. from “NHS” to social health insurance system) As a means of involving a private actor in improving and/ or expanding public services delivery e.g. PPP transactions

15. 15 When a relatively well-functioning part of the private sector – could contribute more by expansion NGOs? ORS producers? Corporate hospitals? Diagnostic labs Pharmacies Midwives

16. 16 Large existing private sector –With problems (to address) e.g. Not participating in disease surveillance –With potential (to mobilize) e.g. serving the population groups you care about; providing critical services, like diagnostics for AIDS and TB.

17. 17 Knowledge (already discussed) Strategy Dialogue Getting beyond NGOs PS motivation & incentives Much & continued attention to implementation

18. 18 Just like the public sector, good policy toward the private sector must be developed strategically. What goals? (disease? Pop’n group? Region?) Which providers/ sellers/ producers? Which policy instruments??

19. Logical flow of thinking about private actors in health programs Problem/ goal specified Current activities characterized Evidence on policy instruments reviewed for effectiveness Private actors important for health program determined 124563 Where important actors and effective instruments exist, priority changes to health programs are identified Relevant private actors identified Desired changes identified

20. 20 In rich mixed-delivery health systems, a multitude of forums and mechanisms for communication (2-way!) between public and private actors exist. In many developing countries – even those with large private sector, there is little communication.

21. 21 NGOs – are often easier for Gov’t to work with (goals aligned; less need for monitoring) However, in most developing countries, NGOs are serving only a very small portion of the population…

22. 22 Health sector policymakers – aren’t accustomed to implementing policy which involves independent actors They must be interested in participating (or reacting/ complying) They must be able to survive (whether business or NGO)

23. 23 Not a “one-shot” deal Requires resources (not a “hand-off”) and much capacity development Generating behavior change of public officials requires “change management” not just directives

24. 24 Regulation (tomorrow) Contracting (today) Training/ Info dis. To providers Vouchers/ demand-side support (tomorrow) Info dissemination to patients Social marketing/ commercialization Social franchising PPP transactions (today) Enabling environment improvement

25. 25 How do they work – the specifics? Whose behavior change is targeted? How is the change motivated? How will that change contribute to objective? Which providers or producers is strategy effective at influencing? What goals can they contribute to?

26. 26 What is the government’s role in implementing the policy? What other policies will be needed? What other actors will need to be involved?

27. 27 I hope I’ve given you some insights into some of the reasons engagement is so difficult. Probably you know more reasons. We’ll use the framework again in the discussion of private health sector assessments. We’ll be covering in more detail, several of the instruments which have been discussed. Assessment is next

28. 28 Questions?? Comments?