2. U.S. Arctic Research Program Response to a Changing Arctic: Current and Future Goals Mead Treadwell, Chair U.S. Arctic Research Commission ARCUS Arctic Forum Washington, DC May 15, 2008

3. Mead Treadwell, ChairMichele Longo Eder Charles Vörösmarty Susan Sugai Duane Laible Tom RoyerVera Kingeekuk Metcalf

4. Arctic Research in the US The U.S. Arctic Research Program is approximately $400 million per year…across at least 15 federal agencies…cooperating with over a dozen nations …using research infrastructure worth billions…and building America’s competitive position

5. http://www.ipy.org www.arctic.gov www.us-ipy.org www.us-ipy.gov International Polar Year

6. U.S. Arctic Research Commission Report on Goals & Objectives 2007 IARPC meeting April 27, 2007

7. USARC Priorities Reinvigorate IARPC and Federal process Revise US Arctic Research Program Plan (based on USARC’s Goals Report) Invest in people (extramural programs) Invest in infrastructure Progress on 5 thematic objectives

8. Research Infrastructure Arctic Observing Network (AON) Satellites Icebreakers Alaska Region Research Vessel Submarines Alaskan Permafrost Observatory Barrow and Bering Sea Cabled Observatories Barrow Global Climate Change Research Facility Hydrogeological Sensor Systems Technologies (Communications and Wireless Networks) Unmanned Autonomous Vehicles/Systems

9. Five Objectives Environmental Change of the Arctic & Bering Seas Arctic Human Health Civil Infrastructure Natural Resource Assessment & Earth Science Indigenous Languages, Identities, Cultures

10. Environmental Change of the Arctic & Bering Seas Establish AON Tie research more closely to CCSP and CCTP Tie Monitoring to GEOSS Agencies we hope will cooperate: –NSF, NOAA, NPRB, DOI, NASA, NSSI, State of Alaska

11. Polar Research Board For PDF version, google “PRB AON“

12. Changes across many sectors of Arctic

15. Permafrost degradation - NPRA, Alaska

16. Have we passed a point of no return? CO2 fixed at 2020 values CO2 fixed at 2030 values CO2 continues to increase Preliminary model results suggest that sea ice can recover if CO2 levels fixed/decline that a seasonally ice-free Arctic might be avoidable. May depend on when/for what ice state this occurs.

18. Arctic Human Health Commit to develop a plan with funding targets Identify agency leader and workshop venue Agencies we hope will cooperate: –HHS (CDC), NIH (Fogarty), EPA, BIA, ANHTC, State of Alaska, IUCH, State Department –Appeal to ARCUS: NIH needs “deal flow”

19. Civil Infrastructure Agencies we hope will cooperate: –For civil work and housing: DOT (FAA, MARAD), Army Corps of Engineers, Denali Commission, State of Alaska, HUD, DOE, NSSI –For oil spills: OSRI, USCG, NOAA, NSSI –For energy: DOE, State of Alaska –For shipping: MARAD, USCG, State Department, others to be identified

20. 16 September 2002

21. 11 September 2007

22. INSROP (1999) Distance: Hamburg to Yokohama (nautical miles) Northern Sea Route ~ 6,920 Suez Canal ~ 11,073 Panama Canal ~ 12,420 Cape of Good Hope ~ 14,542 Shorter Shipping Distances

24. July 2001 Arctic Voice and Data Source: Iridium, LLC

25. July 2006 Arctic Voice and Data Source: Iridium, LLC

26. Having a safe, secure and reliable Arctic shipping regime is vital to the proper development of Arctic resources, especially now given the extent of Arctic ice retreat we witnessed this past summer…We can have such a regime only through cooperation, not competition, among Arctic nations. Denial of passage through international waterways, even though they may be territorial waters, and burdensome transit requirements will not benefit any nation in the long run.” -- Assistant Secretary of State Daniel S. Sullivan, 10/15/2007

28. Natural Resource Assessment & Earth Science Agencies we hope will cooperate: –For mineral resources, mapping and geophysics: DOI (USGS, BLM, MMS, NPS), NSF, intelligence community (Civil Applications Comm.), State of AK (DNR primarily), DOE, NSSI, native corporations, State Department, NOAA (ECS review), oil industry, mapping industry, and mining industry. –For Flora and Fauna: NPRB, NOAA, USFWS, Marine Mammal Commission, State of Alaska

29. 2007

30. Where Is Our ECS?

31. How Much Are the Resources Worth? At least $1 trillion in resources Hydrocarbons (Oil & Gas) Estimated 10 Billion Barrels 750,000 square kilometers where sediment thickness exceeds 1 km Manganese Nodules and Crusts Highest concentration of manganese nodules and at the highest average grades Manganese: 182 million tons Copper: 9 million tons Nickel: 12 million tons Cobalt: 5,000 tons Jack #2 Well in the Gulf of Mexico Drilled in record 7,000 feet of water AP Photo/Devon Energy Corporation Reference: Global Non-Living Resources on the Extended Continental Shelf: Prospects at the Year 2000. Values based on June 2000 prices.

32. Alaska Common wealth: location, people, critters, culture, beauty, land, oil, gas, minerals, timber, fresh water...

38. Indigenous Languages, Identities, Cultures Agency leadership Regular sources of extramural funding Agencies we hope will cooperate: –Smithsonian, NSF, Education, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Endowment for the Arts, University of Alaska Arctic Languages Center, First Alaskans Institute, Alaska Federation of Natives, Canadian, Russian and Danish partners

40. Arctic ownership, sovereignty Harvesting Arctic resources Global Trade: Trans-Arctic Shipping Climate Change Mitigation/Adaptation Protecting values we share – culture and conservation Trillion Dollar Issues

41. USARC ECUMENICAL BELIEF The United States must maintain its global maritime capability—as a government AND as a Nation If the U.S. does not exercise its visible maritime presence in the Arctic Ocean—we cede it to whomever wants it!