1. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 1 June 2005 The ILC Beam Delivery System, ATF2 and ESA Andrei Seryi SLAC DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 14-15, 2005

2. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 2 June 2005 The scene Truly international efforts with more than 100 people are involved in machine and machine-detector aspects of BDS –Daresbury, RHUL, QMUL, Oxford, UCL, LAL, CEA/Saclay, CERN, BINP, DESY, INFN, … –KEK, Tokyo University, Kyoto ICR, IHEP, Pohang AL, … –SLAC, BNL, Fermilab, LLNL, Universities, … and many other … SLAC contribution need to be viewed in this context Experience of BDS design and operation is one of biggest strength of SLAC –Design and work with SLC Final Focus, instrumentation & MDI aspects –Dedicated international Final Focus Test Beam facility ILC BDS design – Working Group 4 of ILC –conveners: Grahame Blair, Tomoyuki Sanuki, Andrei Seryi http://www-project.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/acceldev/beamdelivery/

3. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 3 June 2005 Mature design of BDS; large role of SLAC Final Focus of SLC design with chromaticity correction by interleaved sextupoles Non-interleaved (for x and y planes) sextupole pairs – verified at FFTB The lessons learned at these facilities => FF with local chromaticity correction, designed at SLAC for NLC in 2000, now the basis of ILC BDS Designs for the IR, BDS instrumentation and beam dumps follow the lessons learned at SLC and are the basis for ILC NLC BDS ~2002

4. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 4 June 2005 Beam Delivery System challenges Focus the beam to size of about 500 * 5 nm at IP Provide acceptable detector backgrounds –collimate beam halo Monitor the luminosity spectrum and polarization –diagnostics both upstream and downstream of IP is desired Measure incoming beam properties to allow tuning of the machine Keep the beams in collision & maintain small beam sizes –fast intra-train and slow inter-train feedback Protect detector and beamline components against errant beams Extract disrupted beams and safely transport to beam dumps Optimize IR for all considered detector concepts Minimize cost & ensure Conventional Facilities constructability

5. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 5 June 2005 Choice of crossing angle has crucial influence on the machine performance, reliability, and affect physics reach NLC @ 3ns bunch spacing => 20mrad x-ing; TESLA @ 300ns => chose head-on Incoming and outgoing beam are independent (+) Disrupted beam with large energy spread captured by alternating focusing, no need to bend the beam after collision => easier to minimize beam losses (+) Require compact SC quads and crab cavity The exit hole un-instrumented => loss of detector hermeticity (-) Low energy pairs spread by solenoid field => somewhat larger background (-) No extra exit hole => somewhat better detector hermeticity(+) Low energy pairs spread less => somewhat better background (+) Require electrostatic separator with B- field or RF-kicker Incoming and outgoing magnets shared => difficult optics, collimation apertures set by outgoing beam(-) Need to bend disrupted beam with large energy spread => beam loss, especially at high energy, MPS(-)

6. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 6 June 2005 Evaluation of head-on design by TRC SLAC actively participated in ILC-TRC in 2002, including evaluation of BDS design and head-on scheme –Large losses in extraction line, especially at 1 TeV –Incompatible with post-IP E/Polarization diagnostics –Electrostatic separator 100kV/cm at 1TeV – feasibility in high SR environment –MPS issues –  losses at (or near) septum: ~5-15kW –Parasitic collision 26.5 m from IP @ 1TeV –SR masking over-constrained

7. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 7 June 2005 SLAC contributed to all aspects of turning the Strawman configuration into real design: Full optics for all beamlines; Well developed and optimized 20mrad optics and magnets design; The method and first iteration of optics and magnets for 2mrad IR; Upstream and downstream diagnostics for both IRs 1 st ILC Workshop November 2004

8. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 8 June 2005 to IR2 to IR1 to dump 11 mrad Big Bend & polarimeter chicane ILC2005 Beam Switchyard Optics Based on NLC design Betatron collimation with survivable spoilers Energy & polarization diagnostics BDS for 20mrad IR

9. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 9 June 2005 20mrad IR, extraction & compact SC quads IR design based on compact SC quads developed at BNL Work closely with BNL on design of IR, SC quads, study of its stability Detailed model in Geant Close connection with detector groups optimizing IR and detector design

10. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 10 June 2005 2mrad IR: from concept to optics FF and extraction line optimized simultaneously Quads and sextupoles in the FD optimized to –cancel FF chromaticity –focus the extracted beam SLAC-BNL-UK-France Task Group QF1 pocket coil quad O.Napoly, 1997

11. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 11 June 2005 2mrad IP Extraction Line in Geant SLAC-BNL-UK-France Task Group QD0 SD0 QF1 SF1 QEXF1 BYCHIC Disrupted beam & Sync radiations Beamstrahlung Incoming beam 60 m Shared Large Aperture Magnets Warm Panofsky septum quad (C.Spencer) Rutherford cable SC quad and sextupole No beam &  losses for nominal parameters pocket coil quad Super Septum Quad, B.Parker et al.) or

12. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 12 June 2005 Largest elements of BDS R&D with SLAC involvement Proposed End Station A at SLAC –Study Interaction Region issues and instrumentation –Mockup of full IR Existing ATF at KEK (DR and BDS related studies) –Instrumentation (Nano-BPM, laser wires, optical anchor) –Fast Intra-train feedback (FONT/Feather) –nm resolution BPM test & demonstration –Preparation of ‘ATF-2’ Proposed ATF-2 at KEK –BDS facility, use very low emittance ATF beam

13. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 13 June 2005 End Station A Test Facility For Prototypes of Beam Delivery and IR Components CCLRCLLNLQMULUCLU. of Bristol CERNLancaster U.SLACUC BerkeleyU. of Oregon DESYManchester U.UMass Amherst U. of Cambridge KEKNotre Dame U.U. of Birmingham TEMF TU Darmstadt http://www-project.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/testfac/ESA/esa.html Collimator design, wakefields (T-480) BPM energy spectrometer (T-474) Synch Stripe energy spectrometer (T-475) IP BPMs, kickers EMI (electro-magnetic interference) IR Mockup PAC05 paper/poster: SLAC-PUB-11180 e-Print Archive: physics/0505171

14. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 14 June 2005 End Station A for recent E158 experiment Experimental hall is 60 meters long E158 completed in Sept. 2003 and all beamline components in ESA have been removed. A concrete bunker (not shown) surrounds the beamline.

15. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 15 June 2005 ESA Test Facility: First Experiments T-480: Collimator Wakefields Collimators remove beam halo, but excite wakefields. Goal is to determine optimal collimator material and geometry. T-474, T-475: Energy Spectrometers Precision energy measurements to 50-200 parts per million are needed for Higgs boson and top quark mass measurements. BPM and synchrotron stripe spectrometers will both be evaluated in a common 4-magnet chicane.

16. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 16 June 2005 Envision 2-week run in November 2005, and to have 2-week runs ~every 6 months in 2006-2007. E,z bunch distributions in ESA; 2E10 e - /bunch, 28.5 GeV ILC bunch charge and bunch length End Station A Test Facility

17. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 17 June 2005 Reasons to develop ATF-2 facility Luminosity issues will be extremely challenging in the LC –Likely more challenging than achieving the beam energy Complete FFTB studies –FFTB never demonstrated routine operation of FFS Implement full feedback control and optimization Operate with ILC like bunch train and IP feedback Use stable low emittance beam from ATF DR Learn to operate new FF optics Experience concurrent with ILC construction –FFTB experience will be over 15 years old –Train new generation of physicists ATF2 collaboration, presently 88 people from 21 labs and institutions and growing KEK, Tsukuba IHEP, Beijing BINP, Novosibirsk CCLRC/DL/ASTeC,Daresbury CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette CERN, Geneva Hiroshima University Kyoto ICR, Kyoto LAL, Orsay LLNL, Livermore NIRS, Chiba-shi North Carolina A&T State University Oxford University Pohang Accelerator Laboratory Queen Mary University of London Royal Holloway, University of London DESY, Hamburg SLAC, Stanford UCL, London University of Oregon University of Tokyo ATF2 proposal is to be released in June, during the BDIR workshop in London

18. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 18 June 2005 Optics Design of ATF2 New Beamline Beam ATF2 design & goals (A) Small beam size Obtain  y ~ 35nm Maintain for long time (B) Stabilization of beam center Down to < 2nm by nano-BPM Bunch-to-bunch feedback of ILC-like train New final focus New diagnostics existing extraction

19. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 19 June 2005 Advanced beam instrumentation at ATF2 BSM to confirm 35nm beam size nano-BPM at IP to see the nm stability Laser-wire to tune the beam Cavity BPMs to measure the orbit Movers, active stabilization, alignment system Intratrain feedback, Kickers to produce ILC-like train IP Beam-size monitor (BSM) (Tokyo U./KEK, SLAC, UK) Laser-wire beam-size Monitor (UK group) Cavity BPMs, for use with Q magnets with 100nm resolution (PAL, SLAC, KEK) Cavity BPMs with 2nm resolution, for use at the IP (KEK) Laser wire at ATF

20. Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 20 June 2005 Summary ILC BDS design is making progress from the concept to optics, from optics to engineering design Strong R&D program is planned and ongoing SLAC actively contributing to all aspects of BDS design and R&D