1. REGIONAL COORDINATION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Status Report Debra Wolfe November 30, 2005 WRAP FEJF Meeting Seattle, WA

2. REGIONAL COORDINATION §309 – required for state SMP§309 – required for state SMP §308 – encouraged for state SMP§308 – encouraged for state SMP Tribes are encouraged to coordinateTribes are encouraged to coordinate Identified as integral element of ESMPIdentified as integral element of ESMP

3. RC TASK TEAM - RCTT Formed December 2004Formed December 2004 Tasked with:Tasked with: –Proposing options for SMP inclusion –Identifying ways to facilitate communication between jurisdictions –Developing guidance

4. RCTT MEMBERS Leader: Deb Wolfe Primary Participants: Julie Simpson Brian Finneran Chet Sargent Christi Gordon Dan Redline Darla Potter Darrel Johnston Bob Habeck Lisa Bye Suraj Ahuja Andrea Boyer

5. RCTT MEETINGS February 23-25, 2005 Salt Lake CityFebruary 23-25, 2005 Salt Lake City –Initiate task, discuss scope June 7-8, 2005 DenverJune 7-8, 2005 Denver –Review task –Identify shared SMP elements September 27-29, 2005 MissoulaSeptember 27-29, 2005 Missoula –Identify complete range of SMP elements and functions

6. RCTT GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Optional guidance document intended to facilitate efforts to prevent / mitigate visibility impairment in Class I areas from from planned and unplanned burning on an inter-jurisdictional basis.

7. WHY COORDINATE? Fire emissions affect visibility:Fire emissions affect visibility: –Smoke is regional phenomenon –Not limited by political boundaries –Need to work together to maximize results FEJF develops various policies to inform state / tribal SMPsFEJF develops various policies to inform state / tribal SMPs FEJF ESMP Policy directs development of:FEJF ESMP Policy directs development of: –Policy guidelines –Technical tools

8. WHY COORDINATE? – con’t. Increase communication among affected jurisdictionsIncrease communication among affected jurisdictions Provide burner predictability in managing multi-jurisdictional smoke effectsProvide burner predictability in managing multi-jurisdictional smoke effects Move forward to further develop RFP measures togetherMove forward to further develop RFP measures together

9. WHO PARTICIPATES? RegulatorsRegulators BurnersBurners –Federal –Municipal –State –Tribal –Agricultural

10. WHAT TO COORDINATE? KEY SHARED SMP ELEMENTS KEY SHARED SMP ELEMENTS 1.Location 2.Size 3.Burn Type 4.Fuel loading (tons per acre) 5.Burn date

11. WHEN TO COORDINATE? Prior to ignitionPrior to ignition –Facilitates planning –Instituting voluntary or involuntary restrictions As burn proceedsAs burn proceeds –Ensure visibility effects are minimized if conditions change After burnAfter burn –Archive data –Assess activity (in terms of RFP)

12. WHERE TO COORDINATE? In any area subject to planned or unplanned burning that may affect visibility in any mandatory class I federal area, whether or not such class I area is in the same jurisdiction as the burn location.

13. HOW TO COORDINATE EXAMPLE COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES: Regulatory and nonregulatory measures to control smokeRegulatory and nonregulatory measures to control smoke Meteorological forecastingMeteorological forecasting Centralized databaseCentralized database Public outreach & educationPublic outreach & education Modeling planned burnsModeling planned burns

14. Archiving dataArchiving data Post-burn evaluationsPost-burn evaluations Quantify RFPQuantify RFP Respond jointly to public complaintRespond jointly to public complaint Conduct joint enforcementConduct joint enforcement Implement burner and regulator trainingImplement burner and regulator training HOW TO COORDINATE – con’t.

15. EXAMPLE STATE & TRIBAL SMPs MT / ID State Airshed GroupMT / ID State Airshed Group AZ White Mountain ZoneAZ White Mountain Zone NM State Smoke Mgmt ProgramNM State Smoke Mgmt Program CA Wildland Fire Use Coordination and Communication ProtocolCA Wildland Fire Use Coordination and Communication Protocol OR Smoke Management ProgramOR Smoke Management Program Nez Perce Tribe Smoke Mgmt ProgramNez Perce Tribe Smoke Mgmt Program UT Smoke Management ProgramUT Smoke Management Program WAWA

16. SUMMARY OF GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Seeks to facilitate voluntary burner / regulator communicationSeeks to facilitate voluntary burner / regulator communication Success depends on integration of guidance into other FEJF efforts to reduce anthropogenic fire emissionsSuccess depends on integration of guidance into other FEJF efforts to reduce anthropogenic fire emissions

17. INTEGRATIVE PROCESS FIRE TRACKING SYSTEM WORK PLAN - “Elements for regional coordination should be contained within the should be contained within the system” system” - “Real time data import and export capabilities” capabilities”

18. END OF SLIDES