1. Jeff Dombroski, Lauren Gutlohn, Bernard Marger Making the task of shopping for clothes online more efficient.

2. Existing System

3. Our System

4. User Study Conditions ●Our user study conditions involved our participants trying out each interface (traditional vs. Shopregate) for a week at a time o In order to allow for equal, unbiased representation of each interface and to aid in data collection ●We received 16 participants for our user study

5. Results and Analysis From the results of the p-values, we can see a significant difference in the efficiency of the two interfaces and the ease of clothing comparison with each. There was not a significant difference in the ease of use between the two interfaces. QuestionMean and Std. Dev (Traditional) Mean and Std. Dev (Shopregate) p-/t-values EfficiencyMean: 5.94 Std. Dev: 2.05 Mean: 7.81 Std. Dev: 2.71 p-value: 0.034587 t-value: 1.9682 Ease of UseMean: 7.19 Std. Dev: 1.97 Mean: 7.63 Std. Dev: 3.46 p-value: 0.33262 t-value: 0.4420 Easy to CompareMean: 5.19 Std. Dev: 2.69 Mean: 7.81 Std. Dev: 3.02 p-value: 0.010668 t-value: 2.5913

6. Conclusion From the results of the study, we can reject the null hypothesis due to there being a significant difference in efficiency and ease of comparison between Shopregate and the standard interfaces. Recommend to a friend: 6.5/10 Common feedback: There needs to be more stores and filters.