Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Economic Environment of Business Privatisation and Deregulation: The case for and against.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Economic Environment of Business Privatisation and Deregulation: The case for and against."— Presentation transcript:

1 Economic Environment of Business Privatisation and Deregulation: The case for and against.

2 Why might natural resources be under state control? Natural monopolies May exploit customers if in private hands Public service v private profit Regulation of private business may be used as an alternative to state control – Privatisation.

3 What is privatisation?  Liberalisation of entry into markets previously run by the state (e.g. Licences changed etc.)  Private v public provision (e.g. contracting out domestics at hospitals)  The sale of publicly owned assets

4 Motives for Privatisation  Political – to reduce the power of the state and the trade unions  Efficiency argument – reduce overstaffing. Profits as a stimulus to improve efficiency  Competition – take away monopoly powers, allow allocative efficiency by responding to market signals  Receipts from sale of industry  Wider share-ownership (makes it more difficult to re-nationalise – see Railtrack)  Break union power – and increase productivity

5 The case against Privatisation  Absence of competition  Reducing share price by breaking up state monopoly  Externalities e.g. British Rail and car users (private v social costs)  Under-valuation of state assets – use of sweeteners has bad effect on the psyche of small investors – expect quick, risk-free profits  Short-termism in long-term investment areas  Opportunity costs – deprives banks etc. of money which could have been used to generate real capital rather than transferring the ownership of existing capital  Burden on tax-payers – sold shares they already own! Non-shareholders are dispossessed

6 The Regulation of privatised industry Privatisation of natural monopolies may give rise to abuse of dominant position. Thus: the emergence of regulatory offices to reassure the public. (e.g. OFTEL, OFWAT). Nonetheless, the privatised company can still complain to Competition Commission if it feels regulations are unfair. So what is regulation?

7 Regulation: A definition “Regulation may be defined as the various rules set by governments or their agencies which seek to control the operation of firms.” Role of the regulator is to ensure there is no abuse of dominant position/ market failure.

8 What is the role of the regulator? Create constraints and stimuli (price caps and performance targets) Encourage long term competition (reducing barriers to entry)

9 Regulation may sometimes lead to adverse outcomes:  Lower profits by increasing costs – thus longer term potential for low investment  Lower dividends  Reduced employment (e.g. GB Gas)  Cost saving at expense of welfare benefit

10 Deregulation “Deregulation may be defined as efforts to remove the various rules set by governments or their agencies which seek to control the operation of firms.” (Griffiths & Wall, 2004, p191)

11 Summary We established:  Motives for, and the case against privatisation  The case for and against regulation  The case for and against deregulation  Considerations with respect to competition

12 Next Week Regional Policy What is the regional “problem”? What are the main measures of UK Regional Policy? How can its effectiveness be measured?


Download ppt "Economic Environment of Business Privatisation and Deregulation: The case for and against."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google