Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Trap loss of spin-polarized 4 He* & He* Feshbach resonances Joe Borbely (19-03-2012) Rob van Rooij, Steven Knoop, Wim Vassen.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Trap loss of spin-polarized 4 He* & He* Feshbach resonances Joe Borbely (19-03-2012) Rob van Rooij, Steven Knoop, Wim Vassen."— Presentation transcript:

1 Trap loss of spin-polarized 4 He* & He* Feshbach resonances Joe Borbely (19-03-2012) Rob van Rooij, Steven Knoop, Wim Vassen

2 Trap loss equation Experimental details: – Setup – Procedure Results with 4 He* – magnetic-field dependent trap loss rates Present work – Feshbach resonance: 3 He*- 4 He* Bose-Fermi quantum gas Outline

3 Trap loss equation Experimental details: – Setup – Procedure Results with 4 He* – magnetic-field dependent trap loss rates Present work – Feshbach resonance: 3 He*- 4 He* Bose-Fermi quantum gas Outline

4 Trap loss equation He*: 19.82 eV In a spin-polarized gas, Penning ionization is forbidden due to spin conservation. Total spin of the colliding particles in the final state cannot exceed 1, whereas initially the total spin is 2 In an unpolarized gas two-body losses yield, Time evolution of trapped density, L 1 : background (one-body) collisions L 2 : two-body collisions In spin-polarized He* PI suppressed by 10 4 → one reason for achieving BEC L 3 : three-body collisions: very large release energy Dominant

5 However, our detection signal (the MCP) is a measure of atom number, not density We are interested in solving c 2 and c 3 are constants that depend on trap geometry Trap loss equation Axial frequencyRadial frequency time (ms)

6 1. Collisions with background gas Trap loss equation metastable helium can ionize all atoms (through collisions) - except neon (and ground state helium) atoms

7 2. The spin-dipole interaction induces two inelastic two-body (L 2 ) collision processes: - Relaxation Induced Penning Ionization (RIPI) - Spin Relaxation (SR) GV Shylapnikov et al, PRL 73, 3247 (1994) PO Fedichev et al, PRA 53, 1447 (1996) V Venturi et al, PRA 60, 4635 (1999) couples Dominate loss mechanism Trap loss equation

8 3. Recombination can occur due to interaction between spin-polarized 4 He* in the course of three-body collisions (L 3 ) Two-body Penning Ionization spin-polarized helium molecule two-body PI 4 mK >> 1  K Trap loss equation

9 Experimental details: – Setup – Procedure Results with 4 He* – magnetic-field dependent trap loss rates Present work – Feshbach resonance: 3 He*- 4 He* Bose-Fermi quantum gas Outline

10 electron bombardment 19.82 eV 1557 nm 2059 nm 1083 nm 2x ~120 nm 1557 nm laser light 1083 nm laser light MCP Same laser but different frequency detunings for: collimation slowing cooling trapping detection Experimental setup

11 magnetic field ~100% tranfer magnetic field atom+photon energy +1 0 +1 0 Dressed picture of 4 He* in an RF field Experimental Procedure Atoms are confined in the dipole trap Both m=+1 and m=-1 magnetic substates are trappable

12 Trap loss equation Experimental details: – Setup – Procedure Results with 4 He* – magnetic-field dependent trap loss rates Present work – Feshbach resonance: 3 He*- 4 He* Bose-Fermi quantum gas Outline

13 One-body loss: L 1 Atomic transfer: BEC thermal assumption: thermal equilibrium holds during one-body decay of a condensate loss of a thermal atom (i.e. collisions with background gas) cause a free place in the otherwise saturated thermal distribution a BEC atom fills the thermal hole (keeps thermal equilibrium) Theory: Experiment: (a) (b) 1.7(2) 1.5(2) 80% - 20% 50% - 50% BEC% - Thermal% long times (> 15 sec)

14 Three-body loss: L 3 Fix:  Magnetic-field independent  Identical for m=+1 and m=-1 atoms s  Use only m=-1 atoms (since L 2 =0) AS Tychkov et al, PRA 73, 031603(R) (2006) Present result: VU previous result: Seidelin result (modified): S Seidelin et al, PRL 93, 090409 (2004)

15 Two-body loss rate: L 2 Fix:

16 Two-body loss rate: L 2 N 0 @10 ms N 1 @ 2 s

17 Two-body loss rate: L 2 (Comparison with Theory)

18 Trap loss equation Experimental details: – Setup – Procedure Results with 4 He* – magnetic-field dependent trap loss rates Present work – Feshbach resonance: 3 He*- 4 He* Bose-Fermi quantum gas Outline

19 Energy Atomic separation, R Feshbach resonance 0 two free atoms entrance channel U bg (R) U bg (R) asymptotically connects to two free atoms in the ultracold gas U b (R) can support molecular bound states near the threshold of the entrance channel Feshbach resonances are a tool to control the interaction strength between atoms (ultracold chemistry - He*Rb Efimov physics - Steven Knoop) In the ultracold domain, collisions take place with atoms that have nearly zero energy scattering length B 0 quintet molecular bound channel singlet U b (R) Zeeman energy of the atomic scattering state becomes equal to that of a molecular bound state because of the difference in magnetic moments coupling EcEc  B What is a Feshbach resonance?

20 Feshbach resonances in He*   ~1  s B 0 = 99 G  B=2 mG  1 <<  5

21 21 Feshbach resonance in 3 He*- 4 He* smsms magnetic trap 3 He*(2 3 S f=3/2, m f =-1/2) 4 He*(2 3 S f=1, m f =-1) b A 3He*(23S f=3/2, mf=-3/2) a Dipole trap

22 RF spectroscopy 3 He*- 4 He* Feshbach resonance Feshbach resonance in 3 He*- 4 He* 3 He*(2 3 S f=3/2, m f =-1/2) + 4 He*(2 3 S f=1, m f =-1) b: 3 He* m f =-1/2 A: 4 He* m f =-1 a: 3 He* m f =-3/2 Energy difference: A+b - Ab Threshold = A+b energy Enhanced trap loss at FR Get information of triplet molecular state RF A+bA+b AbAb A+a no collisions between identical fermions limited by three-body loss rate

23 Questions?


Download ppt "Trap loss of spin-polarized 4 He* & He* Feshbach resonances Joe Borbely (19-03-2012) Rob van Rooij, Steven Knoop, Wim Vassen."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google