Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Agenda 5 minutes: WG Overview, announcements 10 minutes: Document plans 30 minutes: Interoperability Experience 10 minutes: Timezone Registry work Links:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Agenda 5 minutes: WG Overview, announcements 10 minutes: Document plans 30 minutes: Interoperability Experience 10 minutes: Timezone Registry work Links:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Agenda 5 minutes: WG Overview, announcements 10 minutes: Document plans 30 minutes: Interoperability Experience 10 minutes: Timezone Registry work Links: See http://ietf.webdav.org/calsifyhttp://ietf.webdav.org/calsify Agenda Bash? Speak now… Scribes?

2 Charter goals review Publish the interoperability issues and document the usage of iCalendar. Revise the Calendaring and Scheduling standards for improved interoperability. Clarify the registration process for iCalendar extensions. Advance the Calendaring and Scheduling standards to Draft Standard. Work on transition (upgrade or versioning) mechanisms for calendar data exchange.

3 Announcements Following PROTO WG process in development  Increases role of WG chair in shepherding docs through IESG process  Proposed updates to RFC 2026 and RFC 2418 Moving to Draft Standard may leave some early products as "sub-standard" CalDAV status will be on list but CalDAV *not* in scope SIP calendar events proposal individual I-D (also not in scope) Notice of planned US timezone changes (DST) See http://ietf.webdav.org/calsify for links

4 RFC-2445bis Strategy Simplify and clarify iCalendar  Reduce ambiguity  Greater interoperability  Greater acceptance  Move to draft standard

5 Other WG documents planned Pat Egen, Jeff McCullough: Interop documentation to support Draft Standard Cyrus Daboo: iTIP bis Alexey Melnikov: iMIP bis

6 Gathering Interoperability Data Calconnect posted questionnaires to IETF mailing lists  Recurrences  Timezones Calconnect is hosting Interoperability events Solicit Input

7 Interoperability problem areas Recurrences  Range Parameter  Rescheduling overlapping entries  Unbounded Rules  Awkward Rules

8 Timezones  Most calendar applications only provide support for a finite set of time zones.  Support for arbitrary timezones is not realistic  Have servers match up with submitted timezone  Support internally

9 Compiling Use Case Data Basic Recurrence Timezone Scheduling (iTIP)

10 Areas with few implementations vToDos component vJournal component Geo property BySeconds RRule property Counter proposing a meeting (iTIP) Delegation of event to someone else (iTIP)

11 Timezone DBs Today Olson Timezone database  Volunteers, email list "registration"  Almost a service (FTP) though not tailored for seeing only TZ changes Existing software  Many TZ dbs in software are based on Olson  Many languages have built-in TZ dbs and logic (java, Python)  OS include TZ dbs (Windows, Linux, Mac)  Some, but not all, calendar client implementations have their own TZ dbs

12 I-D on Timezone Registry Individual submission (not WG chartered) but we can provide input A timezone service (more than just a registry) Ownership issues -- IANA doesn't do live services Political issues -- e.g. who reviews whether TZs are legit Technical issues -- e.g. scale and security Inviting comment: requirements, document determination, implementation experience Experimental?

13 Questions? http://ietf.webdav.org/calsify


Download ppt "Agenda 5 minutes: WG Overview, announcements 10 minutes: Document plans 30 minutes: Interoperability Experience 10 minutes: Timezone Registry work Links:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google