Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR SCIENCE EVALUATION The challenge of providing the Research Information Sytems (RIS) needed in the ERA: Needs of the science.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR SCIENCE EVALUATION The challenge of providing the Research Information Sytems (RIS) needed in the ERA: Needs of the science."— Presentation transcript:

1 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR SCIENCE EVALUATION The challenge of providing the Research Information Sytems (RIS) needed in the ERA: Needs of the science community – a personal view H. Rauch Atominstitut der Österreichischen Universitäten Stadionallee 2, 1020 Wien SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS Pro´s: soft method unibased capable of improvement Contra´s: flops counting expert dependent ISI dependent

2 Institute for Science Information Headquater: Philadelphia/US Offices: US, UK, Irland, Japan, Singapore Employees: 850 Total journals covered: 8676 www.isinet.com Thomson Coop.

3 RANKING OF... Nations Fields Int. Cooperations Institutions Journals Individuals etc. absolute and relatives measures static and time-dependent measures correlation measures

4 Austrian Physics Evaluation F.Aumayr, TU- Wien, Nov.1999

5 Neutron Scattering Science total

6 Neutron Activation and Therapy General Comparison Neutron activation Neutron therapy

7 PHYSICS JOURNAL RANKING Impact Factor T 1/2 1.Rev. Mod. Physics 19.4>10 a 2.Solid State Physics 9.8>10 3.Advances Physics 9.37>10 4.Phys. Rev. Lett. 6.29 5.4 5.Phys. Reports 6.1 8.5 6.Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 5.9 7.6 7.Ann. Rev. Fluid Meth. 5.8 8.5 8.Mat. Sci. Eng. Res. 5.7 4.8 9.Adv. Atomic Mol. Opt. Phys. 5.66>10 10.Rep. Progr. Phys. 5.59 8.4.

8 Journal Ranking Impact Factor 1.Clin.Res.58.28 2.Am.Rev.Immun.49.5 3.Am.Rev.Biochem.44.4 4.Cell40.4 10. Nature27.07 25.Rev.Mod.Phys.19.4

9 Publications versus Citations W.Glänzel, A. Schubert, Scientometrics 56(2003)357

10 Ranking in GDPRanking in articlesRanking in articles per capita per capita per GDP 1.)USASwitzerlandUSA 2.)NorwaySweden India 3.)Iceland Israel China 4.)SwitzerlandDenmarkUK 5.)CanadaFinlandRussia 6.)DenmarkU.K.Japan 7.)Belgium NetherlandsGermany 8.)IrelandCanadaFrance 9.)AustriaAustraliaBrazil 10.)JapanNew Zealand Italy 11.)AustraliaNorwayCanada 12.)Netherlands Singapore Ukraine 13.)Germany USA Turkey.... Different kinds of country ranking

11 World Region Publications M.Batty, The Scientist 17(2003)16, 10

12 Citations per country M.Batty, The Scientist 17(2003)16, 10

13

14

15 WORLD CITATIONS Country Share of World papers (%) Share of world citations (%) US34.6 49 UK 8.0 9.1 Japan 7.3 5.7 Germany 7.0 6.0 France 5.2 4.5 Canada 4.5 4.5 Italy 2.7 2.1 India 2.4 0.7 Australia 2.1 2.1 Netherlands 2.0 2.2 Sweden 1.7 2.1 Switzerland 1.4 1.9 P.R. China 0.9 0.3 Denmark 0.8 1.0 Finland 0.7 0.6 Norway 0.5 0.5 S. Africa 0.5 0.3 New Zealand 0.4 0.4

16 Self-Citations D.W.Arkans, Scientometry 56(1962)235

17

18 Proposal Founding of a European based Initiative on Scientific Information (in cooperation with ISI?) 1 st Step: ESF-Program 2 nd Step: EU-Network

19 CONCLUSION Bibliometric methods contribute essentially to science evaluation Bibliometric methods can help to decide on large facility issues Bibliometric methods will become more important in future Experts can do bibliometric analysis only A European initiative could help

20


Download ppt "PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR SCIENCE EVALUATION The challenge of providing the Research Information Sytems (RIS) needed in the ERA: Needs of the science."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google