Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Anomalous Effects in Thermoluminescence Arkadiusz Mandowski Jacek Orzechowski Ewa Mandowska Institute of Physics Jan Długosz University Częstochowa, Poland.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Anomalous Effects in Thermoluminescence Arkadiusz Mandowski Jacek Orzechowski Ewa Mandowska Institute of Physics Jan Długosz University Częstochowa, Poland."— Presentation transcript:

1 Anomalous Effects in Thermoluminescence Arkadiusz Mandowski Jacek Orzechowski Ewa Mandowska Institute of Physics Jan Długosz University Częstochowa, Poland

2 Principles of luminescence dosimetry  Purpose: Determination of dose of ionizing radiation using optical (luminescence) techniques  Methods: Thermoluminescence (TL) [thermal stimulation – heating] Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) [optical stimulation]

3 Principles of luminescence dosimetry preparing a detector irradiation storage luminescence readout (TL / OSL) (signal reset)

4 Relaxation processes during thermoluminescence Excitation  perturbation of a solid from equilibrium; energy storage; Metastable state  very slow relaxation processes with respect to to given time scale (from minutes to centuries), practically undetectable Heating  fast relaxation, easy to detect, TL  luminescence other properties for other TSR processes TL kinetic theories

5 TL theoretical models

6 Examples of anomalous TL behaviour TL dose-rate effect first order shape of most TL glow peaks the occurrence of very high frequency factors dose-dependent peak parameters (peak positions, activation energies and frequency factors) anomalous heating-rate effect (total number of emitted photons increases with heating rate)

7 Examples of anomalous TL behaviour TL dose-rate effect first order shape of most TL glow peaks the occurrence of very high frequency factors dose-dependent peak parameters (peak positions, activation energies and frequency factors) anomalous heating-rate effect (total number of emitted photons increases with heating rate)

8 Classification of TL/OSL models e-STM LT  With respect to charge carriers type one-carrier kinetics (e.g. active electrons) two-carrier kinetics (active electrons and holes)  With respect to energy distribution OTOR (one trap one recombination centre) discrete distribution or traps and RCs continuous energy distribution of traps and RCs  With respect to spatial distribution geminate pairs T-RC trap clusters random distribution of traps and RCs  With respect to type of interaction localized transitions delocalized transitions (band-like)

9 The simple trap model (STM) (extended) s=1..q, i=1..p,

10 The model of localized transitions (LT)

11 Various topologies of delocalization Clustering  LT STM Displacement of charge carriers 

12 The model of semi-localized transitions (SLT) Clustering  Displacement of charge carriers  LT STM SLT

13 The model of semi-localized transitions (SLT)

14

15 The model of semilocalized transitions (SLT) Mandowski A 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38, 17 T-RC units T-RC

16 Horowitz et al. 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 446 Picture by courtesy of prof. Horowitz and prof. Oster TLD-100 (LiF:Mg,Ti)

17 SLT system – kinetics... ? SLT = STM + LT ? SLT = Semi-localized Transitions STM = Simple Trap Model LT = Localized Transitions NO !

18 The model of semilocalized transitions (SLT) TL kinetics for K=0 Mandowski A 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38, 17

19 The riddle of very high frequency factors Bilski P, (2002) Radiat.Prot.Dosim. 100, 199-206 LiF:Mg,Ti LiF:Mg,Cu,P Unphysical values ! (allowed 10 8   10 14 s -1 ) =10 20 s -1 E=2.05 eV =10 21 s -1 E=2.29 eV Anomalous peaks are very narrow !

20 The riddle of very high frequency factors explained by SLT energy configurations - activation energies for various configurations may be different! - states with charged recombination centres - states with empty recombination centres activation energy gain between charged and non-charged T-RC unit

21 Cascade detrapping E=0.9 eV; E V =0.5 eV; = V =10 10 s -1 E fit =1.65 eV; fit =2.0  10 20 s -1 E fit =1.87 eV; fit =3.0  10 24 s -1 E fit =1.90 eV; fit =1.9  10 26 s -1

22 Cascade detrapping – how does it work? Initally (at low temperatures) most of charge carrier transitions goes within localized pairs A carrier (electron) thermally released to the conduction band recombines to an adjacent hole-electron pair The remaining „lonely” electron having decreased activation energy is rapidly excited to the conduction band The free carrier moves to an an adjacent hole-electron pair and the process repeats one again

23 The heating-rate effect (normal) We measure TL intensity for various heating rates: The number of emitted photons: where:is the quenching function

24 The heating-rate effect in YPO 4 :Ce 3+,Sm 3+ (anomalous) A.J.J. Bos et al., Radiat. Meas. (2010)

25 Explanation of the anomalous heating-rate effect by SLT model Dorenbos, P., 2003b. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, 8417–8434.

26 Explanation of the anomalous heating-rate effect by SLT model Mandowski A, Bos A J J (2011), Radiation Measurements ( doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.05.018 ) Experimental data in YPO 4 :Ce 3+, Sm 3+ SLT modelling

27 Dose-rate effect by SLT model

28 Conclusions  The model of semi-localized transitions model (SLT) offers simple explanation of some anomalous effects in thermoluminescence, including - anomalous heating rate effect - very high effective frequency factors ( cascade detrapping mechanism ) as well as - dose rate efect - first order shape of TL peaks, etc.  Other experimental data indicate the necessity of taking into account larger clusters of traps and RCs.

29 Anomalous Effects in Thermoluminescence Arkadiusz Mandowski, Jacek Orzechowski, Ewa Mandowska Thank you!


Download ppt "Anomalous Effects in Thermoluminescence Arkadiusz Mandowski Jacek Orzechowski Ewa Mandowska Institute of Physics Jan Długosz University Częstochowa, Poland."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google