Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Transforming Installations for an Army at War

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Transforming Installations for an Army at War"— Presentation transcript:

1 Transforming Installations for an Army at War
Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management Association of the United States Army: Annual Meeting 2005 Transforming Installations for an Army at War LTG David Barno Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management

2 Agenda The Army’s Installation Management Team
Stationing Requirements and Planning Stationing Challenges Validation Task Force Update Planning Implications Road Ahead

3 The Army’s Installation Management Team
ACSIM LTG David W. Barno ARSTAFF 78,000+ personnel $13B annual budget DACSIM Ms. J. C. Menig Field Operating Agency (FOA) Installation Management Agency MG Ronald Johnson 78,000+ Community And Family Support Center BG John Macdonald 541 personnel Army Environmental Center COL Tony Francis 182 personnel The heads of our Divisions/Directorates and FOAs are shown on this slide. The 8 divisions are primarily located here in the Pentagon. Our 4 FOAs are: CFSC commanded by BG Decker located at the Summit Center in Alexandria. Army Environmental Center lead by COL DePaz located at Aberdeen. Installation Support Management Activity that primarily supports the Facilities and Housing Directorate,the Plans and Operation, BRAC and ODEP Divisions by maintaining and updating the various installation IT systems developed and used by the ACSIM. They are primarily located at Fort Lee. The IMA is commanded by MG Aadland and stood-up on 1 Oct 02. Installation Support Management Activity Ms. J.C. Menig 298 personnel

4 Our Missions Provide policy guidance, senior leader oversight, and program management on all mission areas relating to overall leadership, management, and resourcing of Army installations worldwide. Ensure the availability of effective and efficient base services and facilities. Provide environmental program management and technical support products and services in support of Army training, acquisition and sound environmental stewardship. Provide equitable, effective and efficient management of Army Installations worldwide to support mission readiness and execution, enable well-being of Soldiers, civilians and family members, improve the Army’s aging infrastructure and preserve our environment. Develop and formulate plans, strategies and standards to achieve “First Choice” MWR programs in support of the theme “MWR For All Of Your Life”; support commanders in the implementation of MWR programs; act as a single source for operation and management of selected MWR activities

5 Our Approach: Business Transformation
Lean/Six Sigma It’s about speed and flow and eliminating waste Efficiency Focuses on maximizing process velocity Provides tools for analyzing process flow and delay times at each activity in a process; Centers on the separation of “value added” from “non-value added” work with tools to eliminate the root causes of non-value added activities and their cost; Provides a means for quantifying and eliminating the cost of complexity. Effectiveness It’s about precision and accuracy (in that order) to yield data-driven decisions Emphasizes the need to recognize opportunities and eliminate defects as defined by customers; Recognizes that variation hinders our ability to reliably deliver high-quality services; Requires data-driven decisions and incorporates a comprehensive set of quality tools under a powerful framework for effective problem solving

6 Common Levels of Support (CLS)
Our Approach: Business Transformation Common Levels of Support (CLS) Implementation Schedule FY05 – Coordinating with MACOMS, Refining CLS, Establish FY06 Service Support Levels FY06 – Funding by Service Support Level as Target, Begin reshaping workforce/contracts FY07 – Full implementation, Workforce Shaped, Dollars aligned Installation Services Note that the Common Levels of Support concept has been reviewed and supported by the 3 and 4 Star leadership. Common Levels of Support, or CLS, is about what the Army will fund, not what won't be funded. Central to the CLS concept is the promise that supported programs will be fully funded and that the standard for performance will be at a "green" level for all funded programs. Consistency and predictability in service delivery across Army installations worldwide

7 Our Situation: A Time of Major Change! Installation Operations
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC 05) 47K Soldiers 100K Family Members Integrated Global Presence and Basing Strategy (IGPBS) Events Affecting Flagship Installations Army Modular Force (AMF) NOTE: the relative quantities are subjective. This is a graphical depiction of what we anticipate will be the MILCON requirements over the next several years as the Army continues its transformation. The point being is that all of these processes are not sequential but rather SIMULTANEOUS. From and Installation perspective who is dealing with little to no funds for Sustainment, Restoration, and Management of Facilities/Base Ops – this storm will directly effect their ability to provide Master Planning and other associated responsibilities. Global War on Terror (GWOT) Support Global War on Terror (GWOT) Support Installation Operations Time

8 Identification, Assessment, and Planning Process
Station Requirements and Planning Identify requirements for a changing Army at War: Combined impacts of Army Modular Force (AMF), Integrated Global Presence & Basing Strategy (IGPBS) & Base Realignment & Closure Act of 2005 (BRAC) Assess needs, identify solutions, and develop Master Plans that meet AMF, BRAC, & IGPBS requirements Identification, Assessment, and Planning Process

9 Stationing Challenges
Posturing facilities and infrastructure to support capabilities of a Transforming Army Minimizing impacts of construction on Soldiers & families through MILCON Transformation Simultaneously meeting stationing E-dates and supporting rotations from Power Projection & Support Platforms Handling increasing demand for family support while Soldiers are deployed Balancing or reprioritizing limited resources against needs of increased force structure

10 Installation Requirements Validation Team:
Requirements Validation Task Force Task Force Mission To conduct an OACSIM-led, multi-phased HQDA and MACOM Task Force designed to integrate multiple missions impact on installations into a single Army Master Plan supporting ACP initiatives/ timelines (Army Modular Force, IGPBS ) and BRAC Installation Requirements Validation Team: Visit 18 installations; receive garrison briefings on installation master plans to support approved AMF, IGPBS, and BRAC stationing and re-stationing actions Validate facility requirements and installation master plans Ensure maximum use of resources and plan is executable to support the arrival of Soldiers and families

11 Installation Site Visits
OACSIM Installation Requirements Visits Installation Site Visits Fort Richardson/ Wainwright Schofield/ Shafter Fort Lewis Fort Knox Fort Riley Fort Carson Fort Bliss Fort Hood Fort Sam Houston Fort Polk Fort Sill Fort Benning Fort Campbell Redstone Fort Bragg Fort Stewart/ Hunter AAF Fort Drum Fort Irwin 15 Aug - 22 Sep 2005 Ft Lewis Ft Knox Schofield Bks Shafter/Wheeler 1 Ft Wainwright Ft Richardson Ft Irwin Ft Riley Ft Hood Ft Carson Ft Bliss Ft Drum Redstone Hunter AAF Fort Stewart Ft Bragg Ft Benning Ft Campbell Ft Polk Ft Sill Ft Sam

12 Senior Leader Team Composition
Validation Team Composition & Impressions G1 G3 G6 G8 ABO Army Corps of Engineers MEDCOM OACSIM IMA HQ IMA Regions CFSC Senior Leader Team Composition Sequencing and timing of moves have potential to save ten/hundreds of millions of dollars Garrisons staffs are shrinking while mission requirements are increasing; taking on more and more formerly TOE Unit missions

13 Active Component Combat Brigade & Division Stationing
Ft Benning Ft Stewart Ft Drum Ft Campbell Ft Polk Ft Hood Ft Lewis Ft Knox Ft Irwin Ft Carson Ft Bliss Ft Riley Ft Bragg OPFOR Unit Legend Division Brigade (BCT) STRYKER BCT 1 Ft Wainwright Ft Richardson Korea Italy Germany

14 Fort Knox Installation Migration Fort Monroe IGPBS Realignments
74/213/95/382 IGPBS Realignments 1,729 / 0 /0/ 1,729 TBD HRC Leased Facilities and Army Leased Facilities 1,019/2,487/889/4,395 Relocate Army Accessions Cmd Relocate Army Cadet Command Relocate EN, MP, and CSS units from Europe and Korea Relocate HRC leased facilities in Alexandria, VA, Indianapolis, IN, and St. Louis, MO. Relocate Army HR XX1 Office Relocate Army Center for Substance Co-location of Accessions Cmd, HRC, USAREC, and Cadet Cmd will create Army HR COE. Establish DCP 254 /3 /0/ 257 Establish IBCT 3,219 / 0 /0/ 3,219 TBD Fort Knox 8,472/3,569/3,844//22,538 Trainee 6,653 Relocate Louisville, KY USAR Center 30 / 13 / 43 RCF Ft Leavenworth 5 / 0/ 0 / 5 TBD Relocate 100th (IT) Division HQs AMEDD - Camp Memorial Blood Drive from Fort Knox to Fort Jackson AMEDD - Selfridge Health Clinic Personnel to Fort Knox TRADOC - Leaders Development Course from Fort Lewis to Fort Knox TECO from Fort Knox to Fort Benning Activate 19th Engineer Bn at Fort Knox Establish BASOPS organizations to provide support to the increased population where that support is currently provided by Armor Center and School personnel scheduled for reduction or transfer to Fort Benning/Fort Leavenworth USADIP personnel from TRADOC to IMA PCF vs. Fort Benning as part of Armor Center & School move, or to Fort Leavenworth as recommended by TRADOC 8) TRADOC recommendation to move BCT to Fort Jackson vs. Fort Benning as directed in BRAC & part of BOLC II to Fort Sill Realign the Regional Confinement Facility MIL / CIV / Other/TOTAL (Trainee) BRAC – Red AMF – BLUE IGPBS – Green Other - Black Fort Benning - 4,312 / 1,029 /319/ 6,653/12,313 Fort McCoy 267 /147 /414 Aberdeen PG 0 / 11 / 3/ 14 Relocate 84th ARRTC Excludes 322 Contract/TPU & 297 Students Realign Armor Ctr and School PCS/TDY Students 1,007 included in Military Population Realign the Army Research Institute, Human Systems Research

15 AIMT Principles Support and resource Garrison Commanders- our Main Effort Empower Subordinates Information Sharing- at all levels Decentralize and de-bureaucratize- process only where value-added Stewardship of our resources Integrity and high ethical standards Grow Innovation and smart risk-taking across our force Develop and invest in our Leaders Set conditions for Long Term Success Focus on our Customers- Soldiers and Families Support for an Army at War Predictability and focus- Lean Six Sigma as the tool

16 Road Ahead Transform the Organization- ACSIM, IMA, AEC and CFSC Institutionalize the effort: Army Campaign Plan, Army Synchronization Meeting, “Stationing” Senior Review Group Army-wide Stationing Rock Drill – Spring ‘06 (?) Re-capitalize and Transform Army Installations- to completion


Download ppt "Transforming Installations for an Army at War"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google