Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Improvement on vertex reconstruction Motivations Many peaks in vertex distributions Further study for the <0.1MeV events S. Moriyama 6 th March 2004 XMASS.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Improvement on vertex reconstruction Motivations Many peaks in vertex distributions Further study for the <0.1MeV events S. Moriyama 6 th March 2004 XMASS."— Presentation transcript:

1 Improvement on vertex reconstruction Motivations Many peaks in vertex distributions Further study for the <0.1MeV events S. Moriyama 6 th March 2004 XMASS meeting Namba’s plots

2 Problem in the vertex reconstruction We are using maps which have value on a 2.5cm spacing grid.  F(ix,iy,iz,ith PMT) Between grid points, F(probability to observe photoelectron by ith PMT) is obtained by a linear interpolation.  F(x,y,z, ith PMT) Namba pointed out that there must be discontinuity of dF/dx, etc, on the grid edge. When I saw likelihood distribution, there is a valley on the grid edge due to the dF/dx discontinuity.

3 How to solve? 1.Adopt higher order interpolation for the maps.  Technically complex for me. 2.Slightly modify likelihood distribution near the current best fit point.  looks good. Best fit here One example: Z(cm) Likelihood Z(cm) Likelihood Zoom up * Actual likelihood 2 nd order polynomial fit Concentration to the grid is now understood.

4 Principle of the improvement For the events wall>2cm, vertex improvement code is called. In the code, likelihood along x, y, and z axis is calculated by 1mm spacing for +/- 1cm region. For each likelihood, 2 nd order ploynomial fit is performed based on the 1mm spacing data, and adopt minimum value of the 2 nd order polynomial as a new fitted result. No modification for energy information (/home/xmass/src/reconst_v6.0)

5 Effect on the source run analysis (Namba) Improvement succeeded. MC Data Further improvement needs maps with more fine spacing.

6 Performance check revisited… Minamino?

7 Background data and MC Note: There was a bug in MC treatment after applying reconst_v4.4 (improvement on <0.1MeV analysis), but there is almost no change by the bug fix. Almost no change observed

8 How about <0.1MeV events? Detail check of wall distribution Horizontal axis (15.5-wall)**3  uniform volume plots can be seen. ~0.6kg/bin

9 Background distributions Horizontal: cm3 (125cm3==10cmFV, 1000cm3==20cmFV) Vertical: DRU Data MC 0-0.1MeV 0.1-0.2MeV 0.2-0.3MeV0.3-0.4MeV 0.4-0.5MeV0.5-1MeV 1-2MeV 2-3MeV

10 0-0.1MeV0.1-0.2MeV 0.2-0.3MeV0.3-0.4MeV

11 Summary Improvement on the vertex reconstruction done. Still there is small grid effect. It will be improved by making fine maps. <0.1MeV problem and Kr like signals seems to be related. Further study is needed why event concentration at the detector center occurs.


Download ppt "Improvement on vertex reconstruction Motivations Many peaks in vertex distributions Further study for the <0.1MeV events S. Moriyama 6 th March 2004 XMASS."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google