Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Experiments in 1-6 h Forecasting of Convective Storms Using Radar Extrapolation and Numerical Weather Prediction Acknowledgements Mei Xu - MM5 Morris Weisman.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Experiments in 1-6 h Forecasting of Convective Storms Using Radar Extrapolation and Numerical Weather Prediction Acknowledgements Mei Xu - MM5 Morris Weisman."— Presentation transcript:

1 Experiments in 1-6 h Forecasting of Convective Storms Using Radar Extrapolation and Numerical Weather Prediction Acknowledgements Mei Xu - MM5 Morris Weisman – WRF James Pinto –WRF, NCWF-6, computer support Steve Weygandt - RUC Tom Saxen – NCWF-6, Extrapolation Cindy Mueller – NCWF-6, Extrapolation, management Jenny Sun – Forecast VDRAS Dan Megenhardt – computer support Rita Roberts – Scientific advise Frank Hage – Display support

2 Overarching Goal Blend Numerical Forecasting Methods and Observational methods To improve 1-6 h nowcasting

3 Predictability Forecast Length Extrapolation NWP Forecast Skill Blended Best

4 Challenge - How to blend extrapolation and model nowcast Extrapolation Forecast Numerical Model Forecast

5 8 methods that produce 1-6h forecasts 4 numerical and 4 observational Forecasts evaluated with the objective of developing ideas for blending numerical and observational To meet this challenge – NCAR conducted a forecast extravaganza this summer

6 Study area June 2005

7 Example Initiation case

8 Extrapolation Probabilities Extrapolation plus smart trending (synoptic situation and time of day) Observational Techniques Examined

9 Probabilities 20 km grid 3 h forecast cycle ACARS, VAD, profiler, GOES precip water) NWP Techniques Examined nested grid 3h forecast cycle observational nudging radar data assimilation (conus mosaic of reflectivity) 4 km grid 24h forecast cycle initialized with 40km ETA The point is- State of the art techniques were available

10 Subjective evaluation of forecast quality

11 1 – forecast and observed almost perfect overlap. 2 – majority of observed and forecast echoes overlap or offsets <50 km. 3- forecast and observed look similar but there are a number of echo offsets and several areas maybe missing or extra. 4 – the forecasts and observed are significantly different with very little overlap; but some features are suggestive of what actually occurred. 5- There is no resemblance to forecast and observed. Forecast Quality Definitions Wilson subjective categories

12 Forecast Observed Quality = 2.0Quality = 3.0 Quality = 4.0 Quality = 5.0 Examples of Forecast Quality

13 1.Quality of forecasts for echo Existing at forecast time. 2. Quality of NWP forecasts of initiation 3. Quality of NWP forecasts of change in area size

14 1. Echo present at forecast time Forecast Quality Extrapolation NWP Best

15 Quality = 4.0 Forecast observed

16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Forecast Length, hours.2.4.6.8 1.0 Accuracy of Rainfall Nowcasts >1 mm/h GRID MESH 20 km Jun-Oct 2002 Courtesy of Shingo Yamada JMA Extrapolation NWP Critical Success Index (CSI) Cross over region

17 Best NWP Results 2-hour forecast 4-hour forecast 6-hour forecast Initiation (number cases) 17 Initiations fx correct (percent) 71 65 Forecast quality (category) 3.63.83.9 Offset median (hours) 1.0 0.0 False alarms (number) 5 2. Initiation Forecasts

18 2, 4 and 6 hr forecasts of trend in area size 3. Area Size Trend Forecasts g+ large growth g medium growth g- small growth nc no change d- small dissipation d medium dissipation d+ large dissipation 7 Trend Categories forecast observed Error 2 categories

19 2, 4 and 6 hr forecasts of trend in area size 3. Area Size Trend Forecasts g+ large growth g medium growth g- small growth nc no change d- small dissipation d medium dissipation d+ large dissipation 7 Trend Categories forecast observed Error 2 categories

20 2, 4 and 6 hr forecasts of trend in area size 3. Area Size Trend Forecasts g+ large growth g medium growth g- small growth nc no change d- small dissipation d medium dissipation d+ large dissipation 7 Trend Categories forecast observed Error 6 categories

21 6 h Best NWP results 3. Area Size Trend Forecasts BestWorse

22 Overarching Goal Blend Numerical Forecasting Methods and Observational methods To improve 1-6 h nowcasting Summary

23 1. Model – frequent cycling (3hr), assimilate radar reflectivity 2. Initiation – Give full weight to model 3. Existing storms – Extrapolate and trend area size based on model trend (more weight for dissipation trend) Unfinished – examine model and extrapolation predictability stratified by precipitation organization, synoptic situation and time of day.

24 Thank You

25 2-hour trend 4-hour trend g+ large growth g medium growth g- small growth nc no change d- small dissipation d medium dissipation d+ large dissipation 6-hour trend Trend Category Number cases Area Size Trends

26 Forecast Observed Quality = 1.5

27 Example Initiation case


Download ppt "Experiments in 1-6 h Forecasting of Convective Storms Using Radar Extrapolation and Numerical Weather Prediction Acknowledgements Mei Xu - MM5 Morris Weisman."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google