Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Analyzing Funders’ Effectiveness and Support to Microfinance Results of the First Global Survey Jasmina Glisovic-Mezieres and Olga Tomilova November 19-21,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Analyzing Funders’ Effectiveness and Support to Microfinance Results of the First Global Survey Jasmina Glisovic-Mezieres and Olga Tomilova November 19-21,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Analyzing Funders’ Effectiveness and Support to Microfinance Results of the First Global Survey Jasmina Glisovic-Mezieres and Olga Tomilova November 19-21, 2008

2 CGAP 2008 Funder Survey First global survey of leading donors and investors in microfinance Based on self-reported data, mostly as of December 2007 54 respondents divided into donors and investors Donors -- bilaterals, multilaterals, foundations Investors -- DFIs, individual investors, institutional investors Purpose: more transparency on microfinance funding flows

3 How much money is flowing into microfinance? Number of respondents: 54 Note: Global projects are not included in this graph. They account for about 1,094 million USD (9%).

4 Who is providing the money? Number of respondents: 54

5 Top Six Funders Worldwide Institutional Type Percentage of Total Funding Committed 1 AsDBMultilateral Agency> 10% 2 KfWDFI 6 to 10 % 3 World BankMultilateral Agency6 to 10 % 4 IFADMultilateral Agency6 to 10 % 5 IFCDFI 6 to 10 % 6 EBRDDFI 6 to 10 % All 652%

6 What is the money used for? Number of respondents: 49 Retail-level dominates

7 Capacity building Number of respondents: 49

8 How does the money flow? Number of respondents: 54 Loans are the main funding instrument

9 DFIs: Global trends Number of Respondents: 16 + 55% Compound annual growth rate for 2005 to 2007

10 DFIs: Regional trends Number of respondents: 49

11 Focus on Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ECA)

12 ECA largest funders, % Institutional Type Percentage of Total Funding in ECA 1EBRDDFI 31% 2KfWDFI 18% 3IFCDFI 12% 4World BankMultilateral Agency6% 5AECIDFI 6% All 573%

13 Distribution of funding by ECA sub-regions In USD ‘000

14 Distribution of funding by ECA sub-regions

15 Breakdown of total committed amount by level of the financial system, %

16 Breakdown of total committed amount by instruments, %

17 Survey data set Donors (33) Bilateral Agencies Aid agencies and ministries of governments in developed countries [e.g., Swedish International Development Agency (Sida), United States Agency for International Development (USAID)] Multilateral Development Banks and UN Agencies Agencies owned by multiple governments of the industrialized and developing world [e.g., World Bank, the regional development banks], and UN agencies [e.g., the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)] Foundations Non-profit corporations or charitable trusts typically funded by a private individual, a family or a corporation, with a principal purpose of making grants to unrelated organizations [e.g., Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Ford Foundation] Other Donors For example, international NGOs Investors (21) Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) The private sector arms of government-owned bilateral and multilateral development agencies [e.g., KfW (Germany), International Finance Corporation (IFC)] Individual Investors Socially motivated individual “retail” investors and high net worth individuals that act as venture philanthropists. Individual investors provide their capital through organizations like Oikocredit, a Dutch cooperative society, investment funds, and online, peer-to-peer platforms like Kiva.org Institutional Investors International retail banks, investment banks, pension funds, and private equity funds that channel capital into microfinance [e.g., Deutsche Bank, TIAA-CREF]

18 Survey participants AECI, AFD, AfDB, AsDB, BIO, CAF, CDC, CIDA, Citi Foundation, Cordaid, DCA USAID, DFID, EBRD, EC, EIB, Finnfund, Finland MoF, FIRST initiative, FMO, Fondation sen'Finances, Ford Foundation, Gates Foundation, GTZ, Hivos, ICCO, IFAD, IFC, ILO, IMF/AFRITAC, IsDB, Italy MoF, JBIC, Lux Dev, KfW, MCC, MIF/IADB, MSDF, Netherlands MoF, Norad, Norfund, Omidyar Network, OPIC, Proparco, Oxfam Novib, Rabobank Foundation, SDC, Sida, SIFEM, Kiva, Oikocredit, TIAA CREF, UNCDF, USAID and World Bank. Note: Outstanding Portfolio = Funds disbursed minus repayments Committed Funding = Funds set aside for microfinance in all active projects, whether or not disbursed.

19 For more information about CGAP 2008 Funder Survey, please contact Jasmina Glisovic- Mezieres at jglisovicmeziere@worldbank.orgjglisovicmeziere@worldbank.org

20 Advancing financial access for the world’s poor www.cgap.org www.microfinancegateway.org


Download ppt "Analyzing Funders’ Effectiveness and Support to Microfinance Results of the First Global Survey Jasmina Glisovic-Mezieres and Olga Tomilova November 19-21,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google