1. Study Report on ROR (Registry Of Registries) 2009.6.23 Hajime Horiuchi MFI Project Leader SC32WG2 N 1263

2. Scope Specify a standard registry to enable users to discover other registries and the services they provide. This standard provides an infrastructure to enable the interoperability among registries that were constructed according to different registry standards or domain specific requirements. This standard specifies metamodels that describe registries and their services

3. Original Schedule Study report 1: 2008.11 (Portuge) Study report 2: 2009.06 (Jeju) WD: 2009.06 (Project split: MFF-9? ) CD: 2009.XX should be extended

4. Agreement We desire to share common facilities such as Administered Item, Designation and Identification between MDR and MFI standards. Those should be investigated at the CD2 stage for 11179-3 (edition 3) MFI standards should take those changes into account at the appropriate stage for each part.

5. SC32 perspectives to the registry Standardization SC32 recognize that there are so many different registry or metadata standard activities in both ISO or outside of ISO. To clarify requirements to the Service Registry standards, A taxonomy of registry type should be investigated in the discussion of the those standardizations. 2015/11/45

6. OAGIS Registry or Metadata related Standard Activities UN/CEFACT OMG ISO TC 37 ISO TC 204 Metadata or Registry Standards OASIS Intelligent Transportation Systems ISO/IEC 11179 MDR ISO/IEC19763 MFI UDDI.org W3C TC154 E-Commerce metadata XML, WSA,WSDL, SOAP Terminology UDDI SQL Catalog ISO TC 215 Health Informatics ISO TC127 Earth Moving machine ebXML RIM, RS SAML UBL Dublin Core ISO TC 46 Library metadata ISO TC211 Geographical data HL7 ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36 Topic map ebXML MOF, CWM, ODM ISO TC184 PLIB, CDD GS1 CCTS, UMM, UCM SIL, Products Catalog NATO ECCMA ISO8000 Learning Metadata ISO/IEC JTC1 SC32 ISO/IEC JTC1 SC34 EPC-G Rosseta Net 2015/11/46

7. An Idea for Taxonomy of Registry Types 7 Domain Specialty Diversity of Stakeholder Type-1 ProcessContents Type-3 Among Experts High (Narrow) Type-2 Cross Industries (BtoB) Metadata Dependent (Non Structural) Model Dependent (Structural) Low (Generic) High Target of the Standardizations System of Systems Registry Of Registries Cross Individuals 10 2 10 8 Service registry 2015/11/4

8. Type-1 Registry Dedicated Registries for specialized closed domains such as Space & Air, Defense, Automobile or Medical industries to support high skilled engineer/experts like SOSE (System of Systems Engineering) Sharing models and process by domain experts. Registry User: limited experts. Example: –TC184: ISO13584 (IEC 60130 ) : Parts Library –TC184: ISO 22745 OTD ( Open Technical Dictionary ) –TC184: ISO29002: Concept dictionaries — Resolution services 2015/11/48

9. Registries to support cross industries B to B business information sharing in the e-business such as the Supply Chain or Traceability. ebXML RIM & RS is a typical standard in this type. But, different registry standards or non standardized registries were implemented in each industry domains (Heterogeneous Registries) Registry User: various different business domain experts ROR (Registry of Registries) standard might be needed Type-2 Registry 2015/11/49

10. ROR(Registry Of Registries) concept Heterogeneous RegistriesRegistry Interoperation Registry ROR ManufacturingLogisticRetails Registry ROR: Registry of Registry SC32 Seoul 020506 4 PDES/STEP Registry Manufacturing ebXML Registry UDDI Component Registry GCI Registry EAN Registry CPFR Registry RosettaNet Registry Business Negotiation Vender Catalog Shipper Catalog Business Category Shipping Customer Support Consumer Profile CALS Production Planning & Procurement System Development 11179 Registry The UDDI 3.0 specification is addressing this ROR concept as Multi-Registries Environment featuring Root & Affiliate registries. ISO/IEC 19763 (MFI: Metamodel Framework for Interoperability) in SC32 is also addressing the ROR concept. 2015/11/410

11. Registry for discovery of services and orchestration of services. the UDDI is typical registry in this type. Registry User: Unlimited Problems: –Who should be responsible in the contents maintenance –How to segregate from Google or Yahoo Type-3 Registry 2015/11/411

12. Comparison of Registry Types Registry TypeType-1Type-2Type-3 Typical Example PLIB RegistryebXML RIM & RS UDDI Purpose of Registry Integration of products in a specific industry Cross Industries information interchange (BtoB) Discovery of Service Major Contents Models & Products Specification Process & Regulations Metadata Business Information (MSG) Metadata Definitions of Service URL/IRI Access Protocols Maintenance Responsibility Covered by Integrator Agencies Covered by Agency in each industries ?? Diversity of Stakeholder 10 2 10 3~4 10 8~9 Problems to be Considered MDA/SOC capability Complexity of contents Inharmonic registries ROR needed Justification of registering 2015/11/412

13. Risk at Type-2 & Type-3 Concentration of Maintenance efforts Concentration of RA(Registration Authority ） Difficulty on the tracking changes or versions Difficulty on assurance of ID or URI persistency Small returns on the registration efforts at users How to differentiate from Google or Yahoo Summary of comparison 2015/11/413 Needs for standards of registry content definitions that enable Automatic Syndication without any central maintenances.

14. 14 An Image for Automatic Syndication of Service Definitions Web service Saas Web Service Saas SD 2015/11/4 RaaS SD Saas SD Saas SD SD: Service Definition RaaS RaaS: Registry as a Service

15. Recommendations for WSSG The Service Registry should be considered as a type of the registries It should be investigated that Registry Standards for type-2 still needed to ensure the integrity and the security in Business domains (BtoB) or not. To promote standardization by the PAS procedure at this area, it is needed to organize and coordinate SDOs in both ISO & Industrial consortia more widely. SC32 initiated study projects on ROR and Metamodel for Service Definition, then,SC32 appreciates to share study results with the WSSG. 2015/11/415

16. Risk at the Centralized Registry Concentration of Maintenance efforts Concentration of RA(Registration Authority ） Difficulty on the tracking changes or versions Difficulty on assurance of ID or URI persistency Small returns on the registration efforts at users How to differentiate from Google or Yahoo Who should be responsible to the dependability of registries Problems 2009/6/181612th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea

17. Emerging Needs for Service Integrators 17 Heterogeneous Registries federation Architecture standards registry content definitions that enable Automatic Syndication Dependability of Service Registration 2009/6/1812th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea

18. Service Integration 18 Dictionary Service Registry Domain Ontology Registry Service(SaaS) Use Find Value Added Service Service(SaaS) Provide 2009/6/18 Service Integrator Domain Metadata Registry Refer 12th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea

19. RaaS There are so different registries in the different fashion Registry interface could be provided as a web service RaaS: Registry as a Service 2009/6/1812th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea 19

20. 20 In the Cloud Web service Saas Web Service Saas SD 2009/6/18 RaaS SD Saas SD Saas SD SD: Service Definition RaaS RaaS: Registry as a Service SaaS: Software as a Service 12th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea

21. Service Hierarchy 21 SaaS vender SaaS vender SaaS vender Service Integrator Service Integrator Tier-1 Service User Tier-2 Tier-3 Service User RaaS Vender Service Registry Service Integration 2009/6/1812th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea

22. J-SaaS https://www.ec.j-saas.jp/shop/main 22 Tier-1 SaaS vender consortium for small & medium enterprises in Japan 2009/6/1812th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea

23. Important Difference “Service Registry” is not equal to “ Registry Service” 2009/6/1812th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea 23 SR R1 R2 Metadata Registry Metamodel Registry Service Registry Registry Service R3 Ontology Registry

24. ebXML RR Registry Service Integration 24 PLIB XML base Registry MFI Registry MDR Registry Unique independent Interface Registry Integration Service Standard Interface Web SErvice 2009/6/1812th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea

25. 25 Registry Service Integration Architecture ～ Overview ～ User Catalogue Information Service Interface Specification Metadata used by Service RaaS Registry Service Platform (J-SaaS) Service Platform (SFDC) S1S1 S2S2 S4S4 S3S3 Reference Service Registry Service enjoy Service lookup ★ :Components to be standardized ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Service Integrator Service Platform ★ S n : Service Registry Service Federation Service Profile Specification in the Registry Interface Specification between Service Integrator and Platform Interface Specification between Service Registry and Service Integrator 2009/6/1812th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea

26. How to proceed the study 2009/6/1826 SOAP WSDL UDDI-x ebXML RR MDR-1,2,3,4,5,6 MFI -2, 3, 4 RSIA: Registry Service Integration Architecture ROR Concept ISO/IEC20944 PLIB ISO/IEC29002 Service Definition (MFI-7) Automatic Syndication (LDAP like) Service Quality Guideline 1.Semantic & Ontology discovery 12th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea

27. A Trial for Implementing ROR 272009/6/1812th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea

28. Experimental trials RaaS Client Browser SOAP http://mr-devel.tiu.ac.jp http://modelregistry.tiu.ac.jp http://serviceregistry.tiu.ac.jp/WS/mdr ROR Service Registry SOAP WSDL http://serviceregistry.tiu.ac.jp/WS/mfi 28 MDR Registries MFI Registries (Registry Service Integration) 2009/6/1812th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea

29. 2009/6/1829 12th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea ModelRegistry site as a Registry Service

30. 2009/6/1812th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea30 MDR Registries

31. 2009/6/18 12th Open Forum for Metadata Registry, Seoul, Korea 31 MFI Registry Service Selection Service