Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFlora Smith Modified over 8 years ago
1
1 Distribution Networks For Large Cities: EPRI Research on Modelling and Analysis Roger DUGAN Sr. Technical Executive Electric Power Research Inst. US
2
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 2 Areas of Research in Network Analysis Power flow studies Annual simulations of large networks State estimation Identifying open secondary cables AMI penetration required for accurate Power delivery efficiency
3
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 3 Typical Network Topology
4
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 4 Example Substation Source Model with Controllers Regulators CT prim2300 PT120 Vreg111 (13.32 kV) Vband3 R2 X3 Delay [s]60 Capacitor Controls ModeQ On:13MVAR Off:-12MVAR Delay 15s Delay 210s Delay 315s Delay 420s
5
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 5 Network A Solution in OpenDSS 2,118 Buses 1,046 Primary Cables 1,552 Secondary Cables 235 Transformers 311 Secondary Load Points 2 Controlled Cap Banks 7 Tap Changer Controls Max pu. voltage = 1.0288 Min pu. voltage = 0.97399 Total Active Power: 150.547 MW Total Reactive Power: 90.1549 Mvar Active Losses: 3.60457 MW, (2.394 %) Reactive Losses: 39.0243 Mvar current-weighted point-to-point plot using bus XY coordinates only
6
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 6 Network B Solution in OpenDSS 10,132 Buses 17,818 Line Segments 552 Transformers 2,272 Load Points + 10 other 4 Controlled Cap Banks 8 Tap Changer Controls Max pu. voltage = 1.0617 Min pu. voltage = 0.94585 Total Active Power: 290.822 MW Total Reactive Power: 142.377 Mvar Total Active Losses: 12.7533 MW, (4.39 %) Total Reactive Losses: 56.323 Mvar current-weighted point-to-point plot using bus XY coordinates only
7
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 7 Network Protector Modelling Found Only on Secondary Networks Incorporates interrupter, communications, PTs, and CTs Open Control – Reverse Power Flow Close Control – Differential Voltage and Phasing
8
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 8 State Estimation Example Can we identify secondary cable outages with AMI? –Interval demand measurements of real-time loads –Need voltage measurement to 1 decimal –Hard to distinguish parallel cables, or within a set SNL BC_5005 USN 1467 (6 in ║) USN 1468 (8 in ║) S=635.56 + j393.88 kVA Cables InLoad Voltage Both119.42 1467 only117.19 1468 only116.13 For the same load, a high residual in the estimated voltage may show: Some of the feeding cables are out Not enough change if just 1 of 14 out Can’t distinguish which of the 14 are out
9
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 9 Annual Losses vs. Vreg, CVR 0.6/2.1 Loads
10
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 10 Summary Work is continuing on research into analysis and modelling of large, multi- phase urban networks State estimation/fault location Efficiency One of the models we are studying will be converted to an IEEE Test Feeder in 2011
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.