Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Dynamical Modeling of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Workshop at RCNP, Nov 4, 2004 Work in partly collaboration with Y.Nara (Frankfurt),

Published byTamsyn Walters Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Dynamical Modeling of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Workshop at RCNP, Nov 4, 2004 Work in partly collaboration with Y.Nara (Frankfurt),"— Presentation transcript:

1 Dynamical Modeling of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Workshop at RCNP, Nov 4, 2004 Work in partly collaboration with Y.Nara (Frankfurt), M.Gyulassy (Columbia)

2 …suggest appealing QGP-based picture of RHIC collision evolu- tion, BUT invoke 5 distinct models, each with own ambigu- ities, to get there. pQCD parton E loss The Five Pillars of RHIC Wisdom Ideal hydro Quark recombination  constituent q d.o.f. CGC Statistical model Early thermalization + soft EOS Very high inferred initial gluon density Very high anticipated initial gluon density u, d, s equil- ibration near T crit Slide from T.Hallman Talk@ICHEP04 ~STAR white paper

3 The State of RHIC Theory LQCD: CPU limitations; applic’y to dynamic matter? Statistical model: equilib’n or phase space? Hydro:  0, freezeout, boost- invariance ambigs. Quark recomb.: predictive power? Parton E loss: untested assump- tions Gluon saturation: universal scale estab- lished? Emerging description of beautiful evolution from one new state of matter to another! And Yet, A patchwork, with model parameters adjusted independ- ently for each element In order to rely on theory for compelling QGP discovery claim, we need: greater coherence; fewer adjusted parameters; quantitative estimates of theoretical uncertainties Slide from T.Hallman Talk@ICHEP04 ~STAR white paper

4 Hairsplitting Comments from Our Approach How are these consistent with each other? Discussion from hydrodynamic point of view: 1. Hydro vs. Statistical model (main topic) 2. Hydro vs. Recombination model 3. Hydro vs. Jet tomography 4. Hydro vs. CGC These discussions will tell us what to do next and lead to a unified understanding of HIC.

5 Today’s Bad News The elliptic flow at RHIC is “accidentally” reproduced by a hydro model.

6 Hydro vs. Statistical Model (1) Chemical parameters  particle ratio Thermal parameters  p t spectra Statistical model T ch >T th (conventional) hydro T ch =T th No reproduction of ratio and spectra simultaneously

7 Hydro vs. Statistical Model (2) P.Huovinen, QM2002 proceedings

8 Hydro vs. Statistical Model (3) ii Introduction of chemical potential for each hadron! Single T f in hydro Hydro works? Both ratio and spectra?

9 Hydro vs. Statistical Model (4) EOS Example of chem. potential Partial chemical equilibrium (PCE) Expansion dynamics is changed (or not)? T.H. and K.Tsuda(’02) 

10 Hydro vs. Statistical Model (5) Model PCE Model CE Contour(T=const.) T(  ) at origin T.H. and K.Tsuda(’02) (T th ) 

11 Hydro vs. Statistical Model (6) How to fix T th in conventional hydro Response to p T slope Spectrum harder as decrease T th Up to how large p T ? T th independence of slope in chemically frozen hydro No way to fix T th Suggests necessity of (semi)hard components Charged hadrons in AuAu 130GeV

12 Hydro vs. Statistical Model (7) Chemical Equilibrium Partial Chemical Equilibrium  K p T.H. and K.Tsuda (’02) Kolb and Heinz(’04) Is v 2 (p T ) sensitive to the late dynamics?

13 Hydro vs. Statistical Model (8) Slope of v 2 (p T ) ~ v 2 / Response to decreasing T th (or increasing  ) v2v2 <pT><pT>v 2 / CE PCE Generic feature! pdV work + (number) /(entropy)   

14 Hydro vs. Statistical Model (9) Simplest case: Pion gas Longitudinal expansion  pdV work! dE T /dy should decrease with decreasing T th.  dN/dy should so. CFO: dS/dy = const.  dN/dy = const.  decreases CE: dS/dy = const.  dN/dy decreases (mass effect)  can increase as long as dN/dy decreases.

15 Hydro vs. Statistical Model (10) PHENIX white paper, nucl-ex/0410003

16 Hydro vs. Statistical Model (11) Choice of T th in conventional hydro results from neglecting chemical f.o. The great cost one has to pay for “simplification”! Importance of chemical potential for each hadrons within hydrodynamics “No-Go theorem”. Yet you use? >90% hydro results at SPS and RHIC do not make sense! Chemical eq. mimics viscous hydro?

17 Today’s Good News Currently, hydro+cascade is the only model which reproduces the elliptic flow, particle ratio, and particle spectra. Caveat: Need realistic interface and oversampling to get rid of numerical artifacts. D.Teaney et al., nucl-th/0110037.

18 Hydro vs. Recombination (1) R.J.Fries et al. (’03) T c =175MeV & v T = 0.55??? reco(Duke) T.H. and K.Tsuda (’02) Half of radial flow comes from hadron phase in hydro Parameter dependence? Today, I won’t discuss (violation of) energy conservation, decrease of entropy…

19 Hydro vs. Recombination (2) Soft+hard reco is important? Naïve idea: Hydro+jet model with recombination via string fragmentation PHENIX “model killer” plot! nucl-ex/0408007 Pick up a parton from QGP Only mass effect T.H.,QM2004 Associated yield 1.7<pT<2.5GeV/c

20 Hydro vs. Jet Tomography (1) I.Vitev, nucl-th/0404052 Input: R AA Output: T.H. and Y.Nara (’04) Input: dN ch /d  Output: consistent?

21 Hydro vs. Jet Tomography (2) Jet tomography: “Color charge density” Hydrodynamics: Parton density cf.) Parton density in chem. eq. Not complete chem. eq.!  Need chemical non-eq. description rate eq. for n g and n q (N f =3), (N f =2) > <

22 Hydro vs. CGC (1) Kharzeev and Levin (’01) Gluons produced from two CGC collisions (KLN) E T /N ~ 1.6 GeV  Consistent with classical Yang Mills on 2D lattice (KNV, Lappi)  Inconsistent with exp. data ~0.6GeV T.H. and Y.Nara(’04)

23 Hydro vs. CGC (2) Gluons produced from two CGC collisions (KLN) E T /N ~ 1.6 GeV Initial condition of hydrodynamic simulations E T /N ~ 1.0 GeVE T /N ~ 0.55 GeV  Consistent with classical Yang Mills on 2D lattice (KNV)  Consistent with exp. data ~0.6 GeV Final (psuedo)rapidity spectra of all hadrons This should be obtained through non-equilibrium processes.  Production of entropy Hydrodynamic evolution  “PdV work” reduces E T /N.

24 Hydro vs. CGC (3) Need a mechanism to reduce E T /N ? E T and/or N Non-equilibrium description is extremely important. Can we get a short thermalization time (~1fm/c)? Is Boltzmann (elastic+inelastic) sufficient for this? If not, may we need non-eq. quantum field approaches?

25 Summary so far We should keep in mind in modeling of HIC: 1.“The right model in the right place” basis Time scale Energy/momentum scale 2.Consistency among models 3.Treatment of interface among models 4.The number of parameters/assumptions as small as possible

Download ppt "Dynamical Modeling of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Workshop at RCNP, Nov 4, 2004 Work in partly collaboration with Y.Nara (Frankfurt),"

Similar presentations

Huichao Song The Ohio State University Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Viscous Hydro +URQMD In collaboration with S.Bass, U.Heinz, C.Shen, P.Huovinen &

Huichao Song The Ohio State University Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Viscous Hydro +URQMD In collaboration with S.Bass, U.Heinz, C.Shen, P.Huovinen &
Elliptic flow of thermal photons in Au+Au collisions at 200GeV QNP2009 Beijing, Sep 21 - 26, 2009 F.M. Liu Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano.

Elliptic flow of thermal photons in Au+Au collisions at 200GeV QNP2009 Beijing, Sep , 2009 F.M. Liu Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano.
Supported by DOE 11/22/2011 QGP viscosity at RHIC and LHC energies 1 Huichao Song 宋慧超 Seminar at the Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC.

Supported by DOE 11/22/2011 QGP viscosity at RHIC and LHC energies 1 Huichao Song 宋慧超 Seminar at the Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC.
Effects of Bulk Viscosity on p T -Spectra and Elliptic Flow Parameter Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Japan Collaborator:

Effects of Bulk Viscosity on p T -Spectra and Elliptic Flow Parameter Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Japan Collaborator:
Peter SteinbergBNL/RIKEN Flow Workshop Landau Hydrodynamics & RHIC Phenomenology Peter Steinberg Brookhaven National Laboratory Workshop on Collective.

Peter SteinbergBNL/RIKEN Flow Workshop Landau Hydrodynamics & RHIC Phenomenology Peter Steinberg Brookhaven National Laboratory Workshop on Collective.
Hadronic Rescattering Effects after Hadronization of QGP Fluids Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo Workshop “Hadronization” in.

Hadronic Rescattering Effects after Hadronization of QGP Fluids Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo Workshop “Hadronization” in.
Hadronic dissipative effects on transverse dynamics at RHIC Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The Univ. of Tokyo QM2008, Feb. 4-10, 2008 TH, U.Heinz, D.Kharzeev,

Hadronic dissipative effects on transverse dynamics at RHIC Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The Univ. of Tokyo QM2008, Feb. 4-10, 2008 TH, U.Heinz, D.Kharzeev,
Collective Flow from QGP Hydro + Hadronic Cascade Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The Univ. of Tokyo ISMD, Aug. 4-10, 2007 TH, U.Heinz, D.Kharzeev, R.Lacey,

Collective Flow from QGP Hydro + Hadronic Cascade Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The Univ. of Tokyo ISMD, Aug. 4-10, 2007 TH, U.Heinz, D.Kharzeev, R.Lacey,
Mass ordering of differential elliptic flow and its violation for  mesons Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, The Univ. of Tokyo Matsumoto, Feb. 10-11,

Mass ordering of differential elliptic flow and its violation for  mesons Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, The Univ. of Tokyo Matsumoto, Feb ,
K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.

K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.
2010/10/18ATHIC2010, Oct 18-20, Wuhan1 Systematic study of particle spectra in heavy-ion collisions using Tsallis statistics Ming Shao, Zebo Tang, Yi Li,

2010/10/18ATHIC2010, Oct 18-20, Wuhan1 Systematic study of particle spectra in heavy-ion collisions using Tsallis statistics Ming Shao, Zebo Tang, Yi Li,
DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, 2003 1 Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.

DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.
Hydrodynamic Approaches to Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano RIKEN BNL Research Center.

Hydrodynamic Approaches to Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano RIKEN BNL Research Center.
What can we learn from hydrodynamic analysis at RHIC? Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, Columbia Univ. Workshop on Quark-Gluon-Plasma Thermalization August.

What can we learn from hydrodynamic analysis at RHIC? Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, Columbia Univ. Workshop on Quark-Gluon-Plasma Thermalization August.
Nu XuInternational Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter, UCLA, March 26 - 31, 20061/20 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions Nu.

Nu XuInternational Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter, UCLA, March , 20061/20 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions Nu.
Statistical Models A.) Chemical equilibration (Braun-Munzinger, Stachel, Redlich, Tounsi) B.) Thermal equilibration (Schnedermann, Heinz) C.) Hydrodynamics.

Statistical Models A.) Chemical equilibration (Braun-Munzinger, Stachel, Redlich, Tounsi) B.) Thermal equilibration (Schnedermann, Heinz) C.) Hydrodynamics.
XXXIII International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics, September 7, 2003 Kraków, Poland Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez STAR Collaboration Review.

XXXIII International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics, September 7, 2003 Kraków, Poland Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez STAR Collaboration Review.
Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Radial flow fluctuations:

Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Radial flow fluctuations:
Toward understanding of Quark-Gluon Plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The University of Tokyo.

Toward understanding of Quark-Gluon Plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The University of Tokyo.
Viscous hydrodynamics DPF 2009 Huichao Song The Ohio State University Supported by DOE 07/30/2009 July 27-July 31, Detroit, MI with shear and bulk viscosity.

Viscous hydrodynamics DPF 2009 Huichao Song The Ohio State University Supported by DOE 07/30/2009 July 27-July 31, Detroit, MI with shear and bulk viscosity.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google