1. v v A Comparison of the Effectiveness between Traditional and Video Modeling Strategies on Motor Skill Assessments Emmalee Cron, Layne Case & Joonkoo Yun COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SCIENCES Introduction Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have been shown to possess relative strengths in processing visual stimuli as opposed to verbal stimuli (Tissot & Evans, 2003). Instructional strategies that use visual means and presentations are recommended over the traditional (verbal) instruction. The effectiveness of video modeling has been demonstrated with social skills, verbal and communication skills, and play skills among children with ASD (Ayres & Langone, 2005; Bellini & Akullian, 2007) but has been used limited in physical activity and motor skill research. Purpose To examine the effectiveness of video modeling strategies compared to traditional instructions on motor skill performance among children with ASD. Methods Participants 19 children (ages 3 to 16) 10 participant with ASD (ages 11-16) 9 participants without disabilities (ages 3-10) The participants were recruited from the local community in the Pacific Northwest in the United States Diagnosis of ASD was confirmed through parental report Table 1. Descriptive Summary of Participants Total Time of Test There were statistically significant differences in the test time among conditions for both groups, F(1,18) = 22.34, p <.01, η 2 =.55. Acknowledgments The main research question and data used in this presentation was a part of the second author’s Master thesis in Exercise and Sport Science, Movement Studies in Disability. We would like to acknowledge and thank all the children that participated in this study, along with the support from their parents. Thank you to William Eason for coding the videos of the participant’s performances. Procedure Two trials of the TGMD-3 administered by the study investigator for each participant Traditional condition Video Modeling condition TGMD-3 assessments took place at the student’s school or OSU campus Each trial of the TGMD-3 was videotaped to be coded later on GroupSample Size Age# of males # of females ASD1012.391 TD97.354 GroupMeanSD ASD-Live75.807.50 ASD-Video76.2010.09 Control-Live69.4419.56 Control-Video68.1119.38 Video Modeling Each TGMD-3 skill presented by video on an iPad Investigator demonstrated each skill and prompted child to try it themselves Note. ASD=Autism Spectrum Disorder, TD= Typically Developing GroupMeanSD ASD-Live16.29*4.35 ASD-Video19.51*5.43 Control-Live13.10*2.40 Control-Video15.54*2.68 Discussion and Summary Video Modeling procedures are longer in duration than the traditional condition for both groups. Though not statistically significant, raw data shows there is an increase in gross motor scores from live to video modeling for children with ASD, and a decrease in gross motor scores from live to video modeling for children without disabilities. Potential reasoning for insignificant outcomes: Small sample size Are the children attending to the videos on the iPad? Age-appropriate skills Previous studies did not blind raters. Like the present study, future studies should blind raters in order to reduce bias toward one condition. Further research is needed to provide more insight and reasoning for or against video modeling in motor assessment settings for children with ASD. 1. 2.4.3. Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3) (Ulrich, in press) TGMD-3 is a standardized motor skill assessment which evaluates 13 different locomotor and ball skills (e.g. run, gallop, overhand throw, one-hand dribble) Participants asked to perform each skill twice Table 2. Descriptive Summary of the Duration of Tests Total Gross Motor Scores Results demonstrate there were changes in total gross motor scores between conditions for both groups, although the differences were not statistically significant. Figure 2. Total Gross Motor Scores Data Analysis Research assistants were blind to the condition of each performance Data was analyzed using a 2x2 (group by condition) repeated measures ANOVA Total Time of Test Total Gross Motor Score Results Table 3. Descriptive Summary of Total Gross Motor Scores Figure 1. Video Modeling Stills Note. Mean is measured in minutes