Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and."— Presentation transcript:

1 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson tom.wilson@mail.wvu.edu Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV Gravity Wrap up > Magnetic Methods (I)

2 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography What is the radius of the smallest equidimensional void (such as a chamber in a cave - think of it more simply as an isolated spherical void) that can be detected by a gravity survey for which the Bouguer gravity values have an accuracy of 0.05 mG? Assume the voids are in limestone and are air-filled (i.e. density contrast, , = 2.7gm/cm 3 ) and that the void centers are never closer to the surface than 100m. i.e. z ≥ 100m Gravity reminders: some of those in-class problems

3 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Basic formula are available for the simple geometrical objects. In this case we use those for the sphere. Let gmax = 0.1 We reasoned that g anom shouldbe at least 0.1 mGal; that Z would be at least 100m, and  = 2.7 2.7gm/cm 3 or 1.7gm/cm 3 R ~ 24m

4 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Determine their depths Use a diagnostic position Assume a minimum value of 0 A. C. B. Anomalies associated with buried equidimensional objects - A.500m B.1000m C.2000m

5 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography In this in-class/take home problem determine whether the anomaly below is produced by a sphere of a cylinder Given:  = 1 gm/cm 3 Is the anomaly observed along this profile produced by an equidimensional shaped object (sphere) or horizontal cylinder? What is the cross sectional radius of the object?

6 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography X 3/4 =280m X 1/2 =500m X 1/4 =890m g 3/4 = 0.98mG g 1/2 = 0.65mG g 1/4 = 0.33mG Analyzing the data

7 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Last item would be to estimate R Sphere Cylinder

8 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography What’s the station elevation? What’s the average elevation in Sector 1? What’s the relative difference between the station elevation and the average elevation of sector 1? 200 520 280 2840 Making the terrain correction

9 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography 20026403 (0.03mG)0.0279mG Determine the average elevation, relative elevation and T for all 8 sectors in the ring. Add these contributions to determine the total contribution of the F-ring to the terrain correction at this location. We will also consider the F-ring contribution if the replacement density of 2.67 gm/cm 3 is used instead of 2 gm/cm 3 and the result obtained using the ring equation. What did you get?

10 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Equation 6-30 What would the answer be if the replacement density were 2.67gm/cm 3 Making the terrain correction

11 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Remember that the Hammer tables assume a density of 2 gm/cm 3. So the result must be adjusted to the local density. In the example below, we assume the local density is 2.67 gm/cm 3. 1.34 x 0.64 = 0.85mG 1.34 x 0.61 = 0.81mG

12 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Examine the map at right. Note the regional and residual (or local) variations in the gravity field through the area. The graphical separation method involves drawing lines through the data that follow the regional trend. The green lines at right extend through the residual feature and reveal what would be the gradual drop in the anomaly across the area if the local feature were not present.

13 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography The residual anomaly is identified by marking the intersections of the extended regional field with the actual anomaly and labeling them with the value of the actual anomaly relative to the extended regional field. -0.5 After labeling all intersections with the relative (or residual ) values, you can contour these values to obtain a map of the residual feature. 0 -0.5 ?

14 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Max = 0 Min ~-1.8 negative What is the depth? X 1/2 ~6000’ d center ~7800’ for the sphere

15 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography If the anomaly was due to a vertical cylinder X 1/2 ~6000’ d top = 6000’x 0.58 ~ 4800’

16 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Locating Trench Boundaries Theoretical model Examination of trench for internal magnetic anomalies. actual field data Gilkeson et al., 1986

17 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Trench boundaries - field data Trench Boundaries - model data Gilkeson et al., 1986

18 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography From Martinek Abandoned Wells

19 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography From Martinek Abandoned Well - raised relief plot of measured magnetic field intensities

20 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Locating abandoned wells

21 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Gochioco and Ruev, 2006 Using the GEM 2 to locate abandoned wells

22 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Falls Run Coal Mine Refuse Pile Magnetic Intensity Wire Frame

23 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Data Acquisition

24 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Magnetic monopoles p1p1 p2p2 r 12 F m12 Magnetic Force  Magnetic Permeability p 1 and p 2 pole strengths Coulomb’s Law Magnetic Fields – Basic Relationships

25 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Force Magnetic Field Intensity often written as H p t is an isolated test pole The text uses F instead of H to represent magnetic field intensity, especially when referring to that of the Earth (F E ). Magnetic Fields – Basic Relationships

26 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography The fundamental magnetic element is a dipole or combination of one positive and one negative magnetic monopole. The characteristics of the magnetic field are derived from the combined effects of non-existent monopoles. Dipole Field Magnetic Fields – Basic Relationships

27 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography monopole vs. dipole Toxic Waste Magnetic Fields – Basic Relationships

28 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography The earth’s main magnetic field

29 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Steve Sheriff’s Environmental Geophysics CourseEnvironmental Geophysics Proton Precession Magnetometers Tom Boyd’s Introduction to Geophysical Exploration CourseIntroduction to Geophysical Exploration Measuring the Earth’s magnetic field water kerosene & alcohol

30 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Source of Protons and DC current source Proton precession generates an alternating current in the surrounding coil Magnetic Fields – Basic Relationships

31 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Proton precession frequency (f) is directly proportional to the main magnetic field intensity F and magnetic moment of the proton. L is the angular momentum of the proton and G is the gyromagnetic ratio which is a constant for all protons (G = M/L = 0.267513/  sec). Hence -

32 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Magnetic Elements

33 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Magnetic Elements

34 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Magnetic Elements

35 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Magnetic Elements

36 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Magnetic north pole: point where field lines point vertically downward Geomagnetic north pole: pole associated with the dipole approximation of the earth’s magnetic field. The compass needle points to the magnetic north pole.

37 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Magnetic Intensity

38 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Magnetic Inclination

39 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Magnetic Inclination

40 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Magnetic Declination

41 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography W Magnetic Declination

42 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Magnetic Elements for your location http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomagmodels/struts/calcPointIGRF

43 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Today’s Space Weather http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/today.html Magnetic Elements http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/magfield.shtml

44 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Anomaly associated with buried metallic materials Bedrock configuration determined from gravity survey Results obtained from inverse modeling Computed magnetic field produced by bedrock Introduction to the magnetics computer lab

45 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Where are the drums and how many are there?

46 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Begin preparing your magnetics paper summaries Look over the initial gravity modeling effort that is combined with the magnetics lab. Look over the magnetic problems handed out in class today (problems 1 and 2). Read chapter 7. Consider problems 7.1 and 7.3. We’ll discuss after Thanksgiving break Looking ahead


Download ppt "Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google