Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 26.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 26."— Presentation transcript:

1 Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 26

2 Benchmark Portfolios Performance evaluation standard Usually a passive index or portfolio May need benchmark for entire portfolio and separate benchmarks for segments to evaluate individual managers

3 Characteristics of Benchmarks Unambiguous Investable Measurable Appropriate Reflective of current investment opinions Specified in advance

4 Building a Benchmark Specialize as appropriate Provide value weightings Provide constraints to portfolio manager

5 Evaluation of Bond Portfolio Performance How did performance compare among portfolio managers relative to the overall bond market or specific benchmarks? What factors explain or contribute to superior or inferior bond-portfolio performance?

6 A Bond Market Line Need a measure of risk such as beta coefficient for equities Difficult to achieve due to bond maturity and coupon effect on volatility of prices Composite risk measure is the bond’s duration Duration replaces beta as risk measure in a bond market line

7 Bond Market Line Evaluation Policy effect –Difference in expected return due to portfolio duration target Interest rate anticipation effect –Differentiated returns from changing duration of the portfolio Analysis effect –Acquiring temporarily mispriced bonds Trading effect –Short-run changes

8 Decomposing Portfolio Returns Into maturity, sector, and quality effects Total return during a period is the income effect and a price change effect The yield-to-maturity (income) effect is the return an investor would receive if nothing had happened to the yield curve during the period Interest rate effect measures changes in the term structure of interest rates during the period

9 Decomposing Portfolio Returns The sector/quality effect measures expected impact on returns because of changing yield spreads between bonds in different sectors and ratings The residual effect is what is left after accounting for the first three factors A large positive residual would indicate superior selection capabilities Time-series plot demonstrates strengths and weaknesses of portfolio manager

10 Analyzing Sources of Return Total return (R) made up of the effect of the interest rate environment (I) and the contribution of the management process (C) R = I + C I is the expected rate of return (E) on a portfolio of default-free securities and the unexpected return (U) on the Treasury Index I = E + U

11 Analyzing Sources of Return C is composed of M = return from maturity management S = return from spread/quality management B = return attributable to the selection of specific securities R = I + C = (E + U) + (M + S + B)

12 Consistency of Performance A study by Kritzman revealed no relationship between performance in the two periods examined in the study A further test also revealed no relationship between past and future performance even among the best and worst performers Based on these results, Kritzman concluded that it would be necessary to examine something besides past performance to determine superior bond portfolio managers

13 Computing Portfolio Returns To evaluate portfolio performance, we have to measure it From Chapter 1 we learned how to calculate a holding period yield, which equals the change in portfolio value plus income divided by beginning portfolio value:

14 Computing Portfolio Returns Dollar-weighted rate of return (DWRR) –Internal rate of return on the portfolio’s cash flows Time-weighted rate of return (TWRR) –Geometric average return TWRR is better –Considers actual period by period portfolio returns –No size bias - inflows and outflows could affect results

15 Performance Presentation Standards AIMR PPS have the following goals: –achieve greater uniformity and comparability among performance presentation –improve the service offered to investment management clients –enhance the professionalism of the industry –bolster the notion of self-regulation

16 Performance Presentation Standards Total return must be used Time-weighted rates of return must be used Portfolios valued quarterly and periodic returns geometrically linked Composite return performance (if presented) must contain all actual fee-paying accounts Performance calculated after trading expenses Taxes must be recognized when incurred Annual returns for all years must be presented Disclosure requirements

17 The Internet Investments Online www.nelnet.com www.styleadvisor.com www.valueline.com www.morningstar.com www.valueline.com www.aimr.org

18 End of Chapter 26 –Evaluation of Portfolio Performance


Download ppt "Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 26."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google